Cargando…

Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices

PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning model to estimate the visual field (VF) from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) and to compare the performance between them. METHODS: Two deep learning models based on Inception-ResNet-v2 were trained to estimate 24...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Jonghoon, Kim, Sungjoon, Kim, Jinmi, Park, Keunheung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34086043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.7.4
_version_ 1783704781542391808
author Shin, Jonghoon
Kim, Sungjoon
Kim, Jinmi
Park, Keunheung
author_facet Shin, Jonghoon
Kim, Sungjoon
Kim, Jinmi
Park, Keunheung
author_sort Shin, Jonghoon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning model to estimate the visual field (VF) from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) and to compare the performance between them. METHODS: Two deep learning models based on Inception-ResNet-v2 were trained to estimate 24-2 VF from SS-OCT and SD-OCT images. The estimation performance of the two models was evaluated by using the root mean square error between the actual and estimated VF. The performance was also compared among different glaucoma severities, Garway-Heath sectorizations, and central/peripheral regions. RESULTS: The training dataset comprised images of 4391 eyes from 2350 subjects, and the test dataset was obtained from another 243 subjects (243 eyes). In all subjects, the global estimation errors were 5.29 ± 2.68 dB (SD-OCT) and 4.51 ± 2.54 dB (SS-OCT), and the estimation error of SS-OCT was significantly lower than that of SD-OCT (P < 0.001). In the analysis of sectors, SS-OCT showed better performance in all sectors except for the inferonasal sector in normal vision and early glaucoma. In advanced glaucoma, the estimation error of the central region was worsened in both OCTs, but SS-OCT was still significantly better in the peripheral region. CONCLUSIONS: Our deep learning model estimated the VF 24-2 better with a wide field image of SS-OCT than did with retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer images of SD-OCT. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This deep learning method can help clinicians to determine the VF from OCT images. OCT manufacturers can equip this system to provide additional VF data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8185404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81854042021-06-16 Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices Shin, Jonghoon Kim, Sungjoon Kim, Jinmi Park, Keunheung Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning model to estimate the visual field (VF) from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) and to compare the performance between them. METHODS: Two deep learning models based on Inception-ResNet-v2 were trained to estimate 24-2 VF from SS-OCT and SD-OCT images. The estimation performance of the two models was evaluated by using the root mean square error between the actual and estimated VF. The performance was also compared among different glaucoma severities, Garway-Heath sectorizations, and central/peripheral regions. RESULTS: The training dataset comprised images of 4391 eyes from 2350 subjects, and the test dataset was obtained from another 243 subjects (243 eyes). In all subjects, the global estimation errors were 5.29 ± 2.68 dB (SD-OCT) and 4.51 ± 2.54 dB (SS-OCT), and the estimation error of SS-OCT was significantly lower than that of SD-OCT (P < 0.001). In the analysis of sectors, SS-OCT showed better performance in all sectors except for the inferonasal sector in normal vision and early glaucoma. In advanced glaucoma, the estimation error of the central region was worsened in both OCTs, but SS-OCT was still significantly better in the peripheral region. CONCLUSIONS: Our deep learning model estimated the VF 24-2 better with a wide field image of SS-OCT than did with retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer images of SD-OCT. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This deep learning method can help clinicians to determine the VF from OCT images. OCT manufacturers can equip this system to provide additional VF data. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8185404/ /pubmed/34086043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.7.4 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Shin, Jonghoon
Kim, Sungjoon
Kim, Jinmi
Park, Keunheung
Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices
title Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices
title_full Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices
title_fullStr Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices
title_full_unstemmed Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices
title_short Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices
title_sort visual field inference from optical coherence tomography using deep learning algorithms: a comparison between devices
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34086043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.7.4
work_keys_str_mv AT shinjonghoon visualfieldinferencefromopticalcoherencetomographyusingdeeplearningalgorithmsacomparisonbetweendevices
AT kimsungjoon visualfieldinferencefromopticalcoherencetomographyusingdeeplearningalgorithmsacomparisonbetweendevices
AT kimjinmi visualfieldinferencefromopticalcoherencetomographyusingdeeplearningalgorithmsacomparisonbetweendevices
AT parkkeunheung visualfieldinferencefromopticalcoherencetomographyusingdeeplearningalgorithmsacomparisonbetweendevices