Cargando…
Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices
PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning model to estimate the visual field (VF) from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) and to compare the performance between them. METHODS: Two deep learning models based on Inception-ResNet-v2 were trained to estimate 24...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34086043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.7.4 |
_version_ | 1783704781542391808 |
---|---|
author | Shin, Jonghoon Kim, Sungjoon Kim, Jinmi Park, Keunheung |
author_facet | Shin, Jonghoon Kim, Sungjoon Kim, Jinmi Park, Keunheung |
author_sort | Shin, Jonghoon |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning model to estimate the visual field (VF) from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) and to compare the performance between them. METHODS: Two deep learning models based on Inception-ResNet-v2 were trained to estimate 24-2 VF from SS-OCT and SD-OCT images. The estimation performance of the two models was evaluated by using the root mean square error between the actual and estimated VF. The performance was also compared among different glaucoma severities, Garway-Heath sectorizations, and central/peripheral regions. RESULTS: The training dataset comprised images of 4391 eyes from 2350 subjects, and the test dataset was obtained from another 243 subjects (243 eyes). In all subjects, the global estimation errors were 5.29 ± 2.68 dB (SD-OCT) and 4.51 ± 2.54 dB (SS-OCT), and the estimation error of SS-OCT was significantly lower than that of SD-OCT (P < 0.001). In the analysis of sectors, SS-OCT showed better performance in all sectors except for the inferonasal sector in normal vision and early glaucoma. In advanced glaucoma, the estimation error of the central region was worsened in both OCTs, but SS-OCT was still significantly better in the peripheral region. CONCLUSIONS: Our deep learning model estimated the VF 24-2 better with a wide field image of SS-OCT than did with retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer images of SD-OCT. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This deep learning method can help clinicians to determine the VF from OCT images. OCT manufacturers can equip this system to provide additional VF data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8185404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81854042021-06-16 Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices Shin, Jonghoon Kim, Sungjoon Kim, Jinmi Park, Keunheung Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning model to estimate the visual field (VF) from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) and to compare the performance between them. METHODS: Two deep learning models based on Inception-ResNet-v2 were trained to estimate 24-2 VF from SS-OCT and SD-OCT images. The estimation performance of the two models was evaluated by using the root mean square error between the actual and estimated VF. The performance was also compared among different glaucoma severities, Garway-Heath sectorizations, and central/peripheral regions. RESULTS: The training dataset comprised images of 4391 eyes from 2350 subjects, and the test dataset was obtained from another 243 subjects (243 eyes). In all subjects, the global estimation errors were 5.29 ± 2.68 dB (SD-OCT) and 4.51 ± 2.54 dB (SS-OCT), and the estimation error of SS-OCT was significantly lower than that of SD-OCT (P < 0.001). In the analysis of sectors, SS-OCT showed better performance in all sectors except for the inferonasal sector in normal vision and early glaucoma. In advanced glaucoma, the estimation error of the central region was worsened in both OCTs, but SS-OCT was still significantly better in the peripheral region. CONCLUSIONS: Our deep learning model estimated the VF 24-2 better with a wide field image of SS-OCT than did with retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer images of SD-OCT. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This deep learning method can help clinicians to determine the VF from OCT images. OCT manufacturers can equip this system to provide additional VF data. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8185404/ /pubmed/34086043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.7.4 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Shin, Jonghoon Kim, Sungjoon Kim, Jinmi Park, Keunheung Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices |
title | Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices |
title_full | Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices |
title_fullStr | Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices |
title_short | Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices |
title_sort | visual field inference from optical coherence tomography using deep learning algorithms: a comparison between devices |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34086043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.7.4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shinjonghoon visualfieldinferencefromopticalcoherencetomographyusingdeeplearningalgorithmsacomparisonbetweendevices AT kimsungjoon visualfieldinferencefromopticalcoherencetomographyusingdeeplearningalgorithmsacomparisonbetweendevices AT kimjinmi visualfieldinferencefromopticalcoherencetomographyusingdeeplearningalgorithmsacomparisonbetweendevices AT parkkeunheung visualfieldinferencefromopticalcoherencetomographyusingdeeplearningalgorithmsacomparisonbetweendevices |