Cargando…
Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the development and implementation of hundreds of clinical trials across the USA. The Trial Innovation Network (TIN), funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, was an established clinical research network that pivoted to respond...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.782 |
_version_ | 1783704784388227072 |
---|---|
author | Greenberg, Rachel G. Poole, Lori Ford, Daniel E. Hanley, Daniel Selker, Harry P. Lane, Karen Dean, J. Michael Burr, Jeri Harris, Paul Wilkins, Consuelo H. Bernard, Gordon Edwards, Terri Benjamin, Daniel K. |
author_facet | Greenberg, Rachel G. Poole, Lori Ford, Daniel E. Hanley, Daniel Selker, Harry P. Lane, Karen Dean, J. Michael Burr, Jeri Harris, Paul Wilkins, Consuelo H. Bernard, Gordon Edwards, Terri Benjamin, Daniel K. |
author_sort | Greenberg, Rachel G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the development and implementation of hundreds of clinical trials across the USA. The Trial Innovation Network (TIN), funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, was an established clinical research network that pivoted to respond to the pandemic. METHODS: The TIN’s three Trial Innovation Centers, Recruitment Innovation Center, and 66 Clinical and Translational Science Award Hub institutions, collaborated to adapt to the pandemic’s rapidly changing landscape, playing central roles in the planning and execution of pivotal studies addressing COVID-19. Our objective was to summarize the results of these collaborations and lessons learned. RESULTS: The TIN provided 29 COVID-related consults between March 2020 and December 2020, including 6 trial participation expressions of interest and 8 community engagement studios from the Recruitment Innovation Center. Key lessons learned from these experiences include the benefits of leveraging an established infrastructure, innovations surrounding remote research activities, data harmonization and central safety reviews, and early community engagement and involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience highlighted the benefits and challenges of a multi-institutional approach to clinical research during a pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8185427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81854272021-06-09 Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic Greenberg, Rachel G. Poole, Lori Ford, Daniel E. Hanley, Daniel Selker, Harry P. Lane, Karen Dean, J. Michael Burr, Jeri Harris, Paul Wilkins, Consuelo H. Bernard, Gordon Edwards, Terri Benjamin, Daniel K. J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the development and implementation of hundreds of clinical trials across the USA. The Trial Innovation Network (TIN), funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, was an established clinical research network that pivoted to respond to the pandemic. METHODS: The TIN’s three Trial Innovation Centers, Recruitment Innovation Center, and 66 Clinical and Translational Science Award Hub institutions, collaborated to adapt to the pandemic’s rapidly changing landscape, playing central roles in the planning and execution of pivotal studies addressing COVID-19. Our objective was to summarize the results of these collaborations and lessons learned. RESULTS: The TIN provided 29 COVID-related consults between March 2020 and December 2020, including 6 trial participation expressions of interest and 8 community engagement studios from the Recruitment Innovation Center. Key lessons learned from these experiences include the benefits of leveraging an established infrastructure, innovations surrounding remote research activities, data harmonization and central safety reviews, and early community engagement and involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience highlighted the benefits and challenges of a multi-institutional approach to clinical research during a pandemic. Cambridge University Press 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8185427/ /pubmed/34192055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.782 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Greenberg, Rachel G. Poole, Lori Ford, Daniel E. Hanley, Daniel Selker, Harry P. Lane, Karen Dean, J. Michael Burr, Jeri Harris, Paul Wilkins, Consuelo H. Bernard, Gordon Edwards, Terri Benjamin, Daniel K. Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic |
title | Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | response of the trial innovation network to the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.782 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greenbergrachelg responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic AT poolelori responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic AT forddaniele responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic AT hanleydaniel responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic AT selkerharryp responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic AT lanekaren responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic AT deanjmichael responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic AT burrjeri responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic AT harrispaul responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic AT wilkinsconsueloh responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic AT bernardgordon responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic AT edwardsterri responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic AT benjamindanielk responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic |