Cargando…

Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the development and implementation of hundreds of clinical trials across the USA. The Trial Innovation Network (TIN), funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, was an established clinical research network that pivoted to respond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greenberg, Rachel G., Poole, Lori, Ford, Daniel E., Hanley, Daniel, Selker, Harry P., Lane, Karen, Dean, J. Michael, Burr, Jeri, Harris, Paul, Wilkins, Consuelo H., Bernard, Gordon, Edwards, Terri, Benjamin, Daniel K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.782
_version_ 1783704784388227072
author Greenberg, Rachel G.
Poole, Lori
Ford, Daniel E.
Hanley, Daniel
Selker, Harry P.
Lane, Karen
Dean, J. Michael
Burr, Jeri
Harris, Paul
Wilkins, Consuelo H.
Bernard, Gordon
Edwards, Terri
Benjamin, Daniel K.
author_facet Greenberg, Rachel G.
Poole, Lori
Ford, Daniel E.
Hanley, Daniel
Selker, Harry P.
Lane, Karen
Dean, J. Michael
Burr, Jeri
Harris, Paul
Wilkins, Consuelo H.
Bernard, Gordon
Edwards, Terri
Benjamin, Daniel K.
author_sort Greenberg, Rachel G.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the development and implementation of hundreds of clinical trials across the USA. The Trial Innovation Network (TIN), funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, was an established clinical research network that pivoted to respond to the pandemic. METHODS: The TIN’s three Trial Innovation Centers, Recruitment Innovation Center, and 66 Clinical and Translational Science Award Hub institutions, collaborated to adapt to the pandemic’s rapidly changing landscape, playing central roles in the planning and execution of pivotal studies addressing COVID-19. Our objective was to summarize the results of these collaborations and lessons learned. RESULTS: The TIN provided 29 COVID-related consults between March 2020 and December 2020, including 6 trial participation expressions of interest and 8 community engagement studios from the Recruitment Innovation Center. Key lessons learned from these experiences include the benefits of leveraging an established infrastructure, innovations surrounding remote research activities, data harmonization and central safety reviews, and early community engagement and involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience highlighted the benefits and challenges of a multi-institutional approach to clinical research during a pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8185427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81854272021-06-09 Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic Greenberg, Rachel G. Poole, Lori Ford, Daniel E. Hanley, Daniel Selker, Harry P. Lane, Karen Dean, J. Michael Burr, Jeri Harris, Paul Wilkins, Consuelo H. Bernard, Gordon Edwards, Terri Benjamin, Daniel K. J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the development and implementation of hundreds of clinical trials across the USA. The Trial Innovation Network (TIN), funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, was an established clinical research network that pivoted to respond to the pandemic. METHODS: The TIN’s three Trial Innovation Centers, Recruitment Innovation Center, and 66 Clinical and Translational Science Award Hub institutions, collaborated to adapt to the pandemic’s rapidly changing landscape, playing central roles in the planning and execution of pivotal studies addressing COVID-19. Our objective was to summarize the results of these collaborations and lessons learned. RESULTS: The TIN provided 29 COVID-related consults between March 2020 and December 2020, including 6 trial participation expressions of interest and 8 community engagement studios from the Recruitment Innovation Center. Key lessons learned from these experiences include the benefits of leveraging an established infrastructure, innovations surrounding remote research activities, data harmonization and central safety reviews, and early community engagement and involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience highlighted the benefits and challenges of a multi-institutional approach to clinical research during a pandemic. Cambridge University Press 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8185427/ /pubmed/34192055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.782 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Greenberg, Rachel G.
Poole, Lori
Ford, Daniel E.
Hanley, Daniel
Selker, Harry P.
Lane, Karen
Dean, J. Michael
Burr, Jeri
Harris, Paul
Wilkins, Consuelo H.
Bernard, Gordon
Edwards, Terri
Benjamin, Daniel K.
Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic
title Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort response of the trial innovation network to the covid-19 pandemic
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.782
work_keys_str_mv AT greenbergrachelg responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic
AT poolelori responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic
AT forddaniele responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic
AT hanleydaniel responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic
AT selkerharryp responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic
AT lanekaren responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic
AT deanjmichael responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic
AT burrjeri responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic
AT harrispaul responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic
AT wilkinsconsueloh responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic
AT bernardgordon responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic
AT edwardsterri responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic
AT benjamindanielk responseofthetrialinnovationnetworktothecovid19pandemic