Cargando…

(68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the metabolic parameters obtained from (18)fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 ((68)Ga)-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT and investigate the relationship between serum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gündoğan, Cihan, Ergül, Nurhan, Çakır, Mehmet Semih, Kılıçkesmez, Özgür, Gürsu, Rıza Umar, Aksoy, Tamer, Çermik, Tevfik Fikret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082503
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2021.92053
_version_ 1783704794619183104
author Gündoğan, Cihan
Ergül, Nurhan
Çakır, Mehmet Semih
Kılıçkesmez, Özgür
Gürsu, Rıza Umar
Aksoy, Tamer
Çermik, Tevfik Fikret
author_facet Gündoğan, Cihan
Ergül, Nurhan
Çakır, Mehmet Semih
Kılıçkesmez, Özgür
Gürsu, Rıza Umar
Aksoy, Tamer
Çermik, Tevfik Fikret
author_sort Gündoğan, Cihan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the metabolic parameters obtained from (18)fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 ((68)Ga)-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT and investigate the relationship between serum alpha-fetoprotein and PET scan parameters in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Fourteen patients were recruited after dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the upper abdomen, and (18)F-FDG and (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging studies were conducted. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn from lesion-free liver tissue, abdominal aorta (A), and right medial gluteal muscle (G) for the background activity. Maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max)) of these regions were compared with the SUV(max) of primary tumor (T). RESULTS: On visual assessment, five patients (36%) experienced low (18)F-FDG uptake in the primary lesion, three patients (21%) experienced moderate uptake, and six patients (43%) experienced high uptake. However, only one patient (7%) showed low (68)Ga-PSMA uptake, two patients (14%) showed moderate uptake, and 11 patients (79%) showed high uptake. Four patients with a low (18)F-FDG uptake showed high (68)Ga-PSMA uptake, while one patient exhibited low uptake with both (18)F-FDG and (68)Ga-PSMA. The number of lesions on (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT and MRI was significantly higher than (18)F-FDG PET/CT (p=0.042 and 0.026, respectively). T/A and T/G values were significantly higher in (68)Ga-PSMA than (18)F-FDG (p=0.002 and 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT is superior to (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the staging of hepatocellular carcinoma. High (68)Ga-PSMA uptake could be promising for PSMA-targeted radionuclide treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8185475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81854752021-06-17 (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Gündoğan, Cihan Ergül, Nurhan Çakır, Mehmet Semih Kılıçkesmez, Özgür Gürsu, Rıza Umar Aksoy, Tamer Çermik, Tevfik Fikret Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the metabolic parameters obtained from (18)fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 ((68)Ga)-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT and investigate the relationship between serum alpha-fetoprotein and PET scan parameters in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Fourteen patients were recruited after dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the upper abdomen, and (18)F-FDG and (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging studies were conducted. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn from lesion-free liver tissue, abdominal aorta (A), and right medial gluteal muscle (G) for the background activity. Maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max)) of these regions were compared with the SUV(max) of primary tumor (T). RESULTS: On visual assessment, five patients (36%) experienced low (18)F-FDG uptake in the primary lesion, three patients (21%) experienced moderate uptake, and six patients (43%) experienced high uptake. However, only one patient (7%) showed low (68)Ga-PSMA uptake, two patients (14%) showed moderate uptake, and 11 patients (79%) showed high uptake. Four patients with a low (18)F-FDG uptake showed high (68)Ga-PSMA uptake, while one patient exhibited low uptake with both (18)F-FDG and (68)Ga-PSMA. The number of lesions on (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT and MRI was significantly higher than (18)F-FDG PET/CT (p=0.042 and 0.026, respectively). T/A and T/G values were significantly higher in (68)Ga-PSMA than (18)F-FDG (p=0.002 and 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT is superior to (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the staging of hepatocellular carcinoma. High (68)Ga-PSMA uptake could be promising for PSMA-targeted radionuclide treatments. Galenos Publishing 2021-06 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8185475/ /pubmed/34082503 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2021.92053 Text en ©Copyright 2021 by Turkish Society of Nuclear Medicine | Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy published by Galenos Yayınevi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gündoğan, Cihan
Ergül, Nurhan
Çakır, Mehmet Semih
Kılıçkesmez, Özgür
Gürsu, Rıza Umar
Aksoy, Tamer
Çermik, Tevfik Fikret
(68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_fullStr (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_short (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Versus (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_sort (68)ga-psma pet/ct versus (18)f-fdg pet/ct for imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082503
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2021.92053
work_keys_str_mv AT gundogancihan 68gapsmapetctversus18ffdgpetctforimagingofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT ergulnurhan 68gapsmapetctversus18ffdgpetctforimagingofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT cakırmehmetsemih 68gapsmapetctversus18ffdgpetctforimagingofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kılıckesmezozgur 68gapsmapetctversus18ffdgpetctforimagingofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT gursurızaumar 68gapsmapetctversus18ffdgpetctforimagingofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT aksoytamer 68gapsmapetctversus18ffdgpetctforimagingofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT cermiktevfikfikret 68gapsmapetctversus18ffdgpetctforimagingofhepatocellularcarcinoma