Cargando…
Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive
Inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) remains the standard of care for patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis, dictating patient prognosis, adjuvant therapies, and surveillance strategies. Importantly the performance of an ILND has been shown to improve cancer-specific outcomes, provi...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159108 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.04.02 |
_version_ | 1783704830757306368 |
---|---|
author | Correa, Andres Felipe |
author_facet | Correa, Andres Felipe |
author_sort | Correa, Andres Felipe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) remains the standard of care for patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis, dictating patient prognosis, adjuvant therapies, and surveillance strategies. Importantly the performance of an ILND has been shown to improve cancer-specific outcomes, providing a modifiable factor for patients with an aggressive malignancy. Surprisingly, the procedure remains underutilized, mainly due to the high surgical morbidity associated with the procedure. The open lymphadenectomy technique has undergone several modifications over the last 30 years to minimize its associated surgical morbidity, but wound-related complications remain significant. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have been recently introduced to help mitigate wound-related complications associated with open lymphadenectomy, with promising results. In this review, we highlight the importance of ILND, present a detail review of the surgical and oncological outcomes associated with open, laparoscopic and robotic ILND for patients with penile cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8185661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81856612021-06-21 Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive Correa, Andres Felipe Transl Androl Urol Review Article on Controversies in Minimally Invasive Urologic Oncology Inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) remains the standard of care for patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis, dictating patient prognosis, adjuvant therapies, and surveillance strategies. Importantly the performance of an ILND has been shown to improve cancer-specific outcomes, providing a modifiable factor for patients with an aggressive malignancy. Surprisingly, the procedure remains underutilized, mainly due to the high surgical morbidity associated with the procedure. The open lymphadenectomy technique has undergone several modifications over the last 30 years to minimize its associated surgical morbidity, but wound-related complications remain significant. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have been recently introduced to help mitigate wound-related complications associated with open lymphadenectomy, with promising results. In this review, we highlight the importance of ILND, present a detail review of the surgical and oncological outcomes associated with open, laparoscopic and robotic ILND for patients with penile cancer. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8185661/ /pubmed/34159108 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.04.02 Text en 2021 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article on Controversies in Minimally Invasive Urologic Oncology Correa, Andres Felipe Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive |
title | Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive |
title_full | Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive |
title_fullStr | Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive |
title_full_unstemmed | Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive |
title_short | Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive |
title_sort | technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive |
topic | Review Article on Controversies in Minimally Invasive Urologic Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159108 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.04.02 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT correaandresfelipe technicalmanagementofinguinallymphnodesinpenilecanceropenversusminimalinvasive |