Cargando…

Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive

Inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) remains the standard of care for patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis, dictating patient prognosis, adjuvant therapies, and surveillance strategies. Importantly the performance of an ILND has been shown to improve cancer-specific outcomes, provi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Correa, Andres Felipe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159108
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.04.02
_version_ 1783704830757306368
author Correa, Andres Felipe
author_facet Correa, Andres Felipe
author_sort Correa, Andres Felipe
collection PubMed
description Inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) remains the standard of care for patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis, dictating patient prognosis, adjuvant therapies, and surveillance strategies. Importantly the performance of an ILND has been shown to improve cancer-specific outcomes, providing a modifiable factor for patients with an aggressive malignancy. Surprisingly, the procedure remains underutilized, mainly due to the high surgical morbidity associated with the procedure. The open lymphadenectomy technique has undergone several modifications over the last 30 years to minimize its associated surgical morbidity, but wound-related complications remain significant. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have been recently introduced to help mitigate wound-related complications associated with open lymphadenectomy, with promising results. In this review, we highlight the importance of ILND, present a detail review of the surgical and oncological outcomes associated with open, laparoscopic and robotic ILND for patients with penile cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8185661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81856612021-06-21 Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive Correa, Andres Felipe Transl Androl Urol Review Article on Controversies in Minimally Invasive Urologic Oncology Inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) remains the standard of care for patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis, dictating patient prognosis, adjuvant therapies, and surveillance strategies. Importantly the performance of an ILND has been shown to improve cancer-specific outcomes, providing a modifiable factor for patients with an aggressive malignancy. Surprisingly, the procedure remains underutilized, mainly due to the high surgical morbidity associated with the procedure. The open lymphadenectomy technique has undergone several modifications over the last 30 years to minimize its associated surgical morbidity, but wound-related complications remain significant. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have been recently introduced to help mitigate wound-related complications associated with open lymphadenectomy, with promising results. In this review, we highlight the importance of ILND, present a detail review of the surgical and oncological outcomes associated with open, laparoscopic and robotic ILND for patients with penile cancer. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8185661/ /pubmed/34159108 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.04.02 Text en 2021 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article on Controversies in Minimally Invasive Urologic Oncology
Correa, Andres Felipe
Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive
title Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive
title_full Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive
title_fullStr Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive
title_full_unstemmed Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive
title_short Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive
title_sort technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive
topic Review Article on Controversies in Minimally Invasive Urologic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159108
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.04.02
work_keys_str_mv AT correaandresfelipe technicalmanagementofinguinallymphnodesinpenilecanceropenversusminimalinvasive