Cargando…

Fracture of the inferior pole of the patella: tension band wiring versus transosseous reattachment

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical technique for the fixation of inferior pole patellar fracture remains controversial. The aims of this study were (1) to compare clinical and radiological outcomes following fixation of inferior pole patellar fracture by using tension band wire (TBW) and transosseous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Chih-Hsun, Chuang, Hao-Chun, Su, Wei-Ren, Kuan, Fa-Chuan, Hong, Chih-Kai, Hsu, Kai-Lan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02519-x
_version_ 1783704861205856256
author Chang, Chih-Hsun
Chuang, Hao-Chun
Su, Wei-Ren
Kuan, Fa-Chuan
Hong, Chih-Kai
Hsu, Kai-Lan
author_facet Chang, Chih-Hsun
Chuang, Hao-Chun
Su, Wei-Ren
Kuan, Fa-Chuan
Hong, Chih-Kai
Hsu, Kai-Lan
author_sort Chang, Chih-Hsun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical technique for the fixation of inferior pole patellar fracture remains controversial. The aims of this study were (1) to compare clinical and radiological outcomes following fixation of inferior pole patellar fracture by using tension band wire (TBW) and transosseous reattachment (TOR) without excision of the bony fragment and (2) to determine the risk factors for postoperative radiological loss of reduction. METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients with inferior pole patellar fracture between January 2010 and December 2017 were recruited. The patients were grouped according to their fixation method (TBW or TOR), and demographic data, clinical outcomes, and postoperative Insall–Salvati (IS) ratio were analyzed. Then, the patients were grouped according to radiological loss of reduction, the possible risk factors for loss of reduction were identified, and odds ratios were calculated. RESULT: This study included 55 patients with inferior pole patellar fracture; 30 patients were treated using TBW and 25 were treated using TOR. Clinical failure occurred in two patients in the TBW group (7%) and three in the TOR group (12%). The rate of radiological loss of reduction was significant higher in the TOR group, whereas removal of implants was significantly more common in the TBW group. Patella baja was noted immediately after surgery in the TOR group, but the IS ratios of the two groups were similar after 3 months. Fracture displacement of more than 30 mm was the only independent risk factor for postoperative radiological loss of reduction. CONCLUSION: For treating inferior pole patellar fracture, both TWB and TOR were effective and had a low clinical failure rate. In 60% of patients undergoing TBW fixation, however, additional surgery was required to remove the implants. Patella baja occurred immediately following TOR, but the patellar height was similar to that in the TBW group after 3 months. Surgeons should be aware of the high risk of postoperative radiological loss of reduction, especially when the fracture displacement is more than 30 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8185944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81859442021-06-09 Fracture of the inferior pole of the patella: tension band wiring versus transosseous reattachment Chang, Chih-Hsun Chuang, Hao-Chun Su, Wei-Ren Kuan, Fa-Chuan Hong, Chih-Kai Hsu, Kai-Lan J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical technique for the fixation of inferior pole patellar fracture remains controversial. The aims of this study were (1) to compare clinical and radiological outcomes following fixation of inferior pole patellar fracture by using tension band wire (TBW) and transosseous reattachment (TOR) without excision of the bony fragment and (2) to determine the risk factors for postoperative radiological loss of reduction. METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients with inferior pole patellar fracture between January 2010 and December 2017 were recruited. The patients were grouped according to their fixation method (TBW or TOR), and demographic data, clinical outcomes, and postoperative Insall–Salvati (IS) ratio were analyzed. Then, the patients were grouped according to radiological loss of reduction, the possible risk factors for loss of reduction were identified, and odds ratios were calculated. RESULT: This study included 55 patients with inferior pole patellar fracture; 30 patients were treated using TBW and 25 were treated using TOR. Clinical failure occurred in two patients in the TBW group (7%) and three in the TOR group (12%). The rate of radiological loss of reduction was significant higher in the TOR group, whereas removal of implants was significantly more common in the TBW group. Patella baja was noted immediately after surgery in the TOR group, but the IS ratios of the two groups were similar after 3 months. Fracture displacement of more than 30 mm was the only independent risk factor for postoperative radiological loss of reduction. CONCLUSION: For treating inferior pole patellar fracture, both TWB and TOR were effective and had a low clinical failure rate. In 60% of patients undergoing TBW fixation, however, additional surgery was required to remove the implants. Patella baja occurred immediately following TOR, but the patellar height was similar to that in the TBW group after 3 months. Surgeons should be aware of the high risk of postoperative radiological loss of reduction, especially when the fracture displacement is more than 30 mm. BioMed Central 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8185944/ /pubmed/34103048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02519-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chang, Chih-Hsun
Chuang, Hao-Chun
Su, Wei-Ren
Kuan, Fa-Chuan
Hong, Chih-Kai
Hsu, Kai-Lan
Fracture of the inferior pole of the patella: tension band wiring versus transosseous reattachment
title Fracture of the inferior pole of the patella: tension band wiring versus transosseous reattachment
title_full Fracture of the inferior pole of the patella: tension band wiring versus transosseous reattachment
title_fullStr Fracture of the inferior pole of the patella: tension band wiring versus transosseous reattachment
title_full_unstemmed Fracture of the inferior pole of the patella: tension band wiring versus transosseous reattachment
title_short Fracture of the inferior pole of the patella: tension band wiring versus transosseous reattachment
title_sort fracture of the inferior pole of the patella: tension band wiring versus transosseous reattachment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02519-x
work_keys_str_mv AT changchihhsun fractureoftheinferiorpoleofthepatellatensionbandwiringversustransosseousreattachment
AT chuanghaochun fractureoftheinferiorpoleofthepatellatensionbandwiringversustransosseousreattachment
AT suweiren fractureoftheinferiorpoleofthepatellatensionbandwiringversustransosseousreattachment
AT kuanfachuan fractureoftheinferiorpoleofthepatellatensionbandwiringversustransosseousreattachment
AT hongchihkai fractureoftheinferiorpoleofthepatellatensionbandwiringversustransosseousreattachment
AT hsukailan fractureoftheinferiorpoleofthepatellatensionbandwiringversustransosseousreattachment