Cargando…
BayCANN: Streamlining Bayesian Calibration With Artificial Neural Network Metamodeling
Purpose: Bayesian calibration is generally superior to standard direct-search algorithms in that it estimates the full joint posterior distribution of the calibrated parameters. However, there are many barriers to using Bayesian calibration in health decision sciences stemming from the need to progr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113262 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.662314 |
_version_ | 1783704863398428672 |
---|---|
author | Jalal, Hawre Trikalinos, Thomas A. Alarid-Escudero, Fernando |
author_facet | Jalal, Hawre Trikalinos, Thomas A. Alarid-Escudero, Fernando |
author_sort | Jalal, Hawre |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Bayesian calibration is generally superior to standard direct-search algorithms in that it estimates the full joint posterior distribution of the calibrated parameters. However, there are many barriers to using Bayesian calibration in health decision sciences stemming from the need to program complex models in probabilistic programming languages and the associated computational burden of applying Bayesian calibration. In this paper, we propose to use artificial neural networks (ANN) as one practical solution to these challenges. Methods: Bayesian Calibration using Artificial Neural Networks (BayCANN) involves (1) training an ANN metamodel on a sample of model inputs and outputs, and (2) then calibrating the trained ANN metamodel instead of the full model in a probabilistic programming language to obtain the posterior joint distribution of the calibrated parameters. We illustrate BayCANN using a colorectal cancer natural history model. We conduct a confirmatory simulation analysis by first obtaining parameter estimates from the literature and then using them to generate adenoma prevalence and cancer incidence targets. We compare the performance of BayCANN in recovering these “true” parameter values against performing a Bayesian calibration directly on the simulation model using an incremental mixture importance sampling (IMIS) algorithm. Results: We were able to apply BayCANN using only a dataset of the model inputs and outputs and minor modification of BayCANN's code. In this example, BayCANN was slightly more accurate in recovering the true posterior parameter estimates compared to IMIS. Obtaining the dataset of samples, and running BayCANN took 15 min compared to the IMIS which took 80 min. In applications involving computationally more expensive simulations (e.g., microsimulations), BayCANN may offer higher relative speed gains. Conclusions: BayCANN only uses a dataset of model inputs and outputs to obtain the calibrated joint parameter distributions. Thus, it can be adapted to models of various levels of complexity with minor or no change to its structure. In addition, BayCANN's efficiency can be especially useful in computationally expensive models. To facilitate BayCANN's wider adoption, we provide BayCANN's open-source implementation in R and Stan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8185956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81859562021-06-09 BayCANN: Streamlining Bayesian Calibration With Artificial Neural Network Metamodeling Jalal, Hawre Trikalinos, Thomas A. Alarid-Escudero, Fernando Front Physiol Physiology Purpose: Bayesian calibration is generally superior to standard direct-search algorithms in that it estimates the full joint posterior distribution of the calibrated parameters. However, there are many barriers to using Bayesian calibration in health decision sciences stemming from the need to program complex models in probabilistic programming languages and the associated computational burden of applying Bayesian calibration. In this paper, we propose to use artificial neural networks (ANN) as one practical solution to these challenges. Methods: Bayesian Calibration using Artificial Neural Networks (BayCANN) involves (1) training an ANN metamodel on a sample of model inputs and outputs, and (2) then calibrating the trained ANN metamodel instead of the full model in a probabilistic programming language to obtain the posterior joint distribution of the calibrated parameters. We illustrate BayCANN using a colorectal cancer natural history model. We conduct a confirmatory simulation analysis by first obtaining parameter estimates from the literature and then using them to generate adenoma prevalence and cancer incidence targets. We compare the performance of BayCANN in recovering these “true” parameter values against performing a Bayesian calibration directly on the simulation model using an incremental mixture importance sampling (IMIS) algorithm. Results: We were able to apply BayCANN using only a dataset of the model inputs and outputs and minor modification of BayCANN's code. In this example, BayCANN was slightly more accurate in recovering the true posterior parameter estimates compared to IMIS. Obtaining the dataset of samples, and running BayCANN took 15 min compared to the IMIS which took 80 min. In applications involving computationally more expensive simulations (e.g., microsimulations), BayCANN may offer higher relative speed gains. Conclusions: BayCANN only uses a dataset of model inputs and outputs to obtain the calibrated joint parameter distributions. Thus, it can be adapted to models of various levels of complexity with minor or no change to its structure. In addition, BayCANN's efficiency can be especially useful in computationally expensive models. To facilitate BayCANN's wider adoption, we provide BayCANN's open-source implementation in R and Stan. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8185956/ /pubmed/34113262 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.662314 Text en Copyright © 2021 Jalal, Trikalinos and Alarid-Escudero. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Jalal, Hawre Trikalinos, Thomas A. Alarid-Escudero, Fernando BayCANN: Streamlining Bayesian Calibration With Artificial Neural Network Metamodeling |
title | BayCANN: Streamlining Bayesian Calibration With Artificial Neural Network Metamodeling |
title_full | BayCANN: Streamlining Bayesian Calibration With Artificial Neural Network Metamodeling |
title_fullStr | BayCANN: Streamlining Bayesian Calibration With Artificial Neural Network Metamodeling |
title_full_unstemmed | BayCANN: Streamlining Bayesian Calibration With Artificial Neural Network Metamodeling |
title_short | BayCANN: Streamlining Bayesian Calibration With Artificial Neural Network Metamodeling |
title_sort | baycann: streamlining bayesian calibration with artificial neural network metamodeling |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113262 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.662314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jalalhawre baycannstreamliningbayesiancalibrationwithartificialneuralnetworkmetamodeling AT trikalinosthomasa baycannstreamliningbayesiancalibrationwithartificialneuralnetworkmetamodeling AT alaridescuderofernando baycannstreamliningbayesiancalibrationwithartificialneuralnetworkmetamodeling |