Cargando…

Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada

BACKGROUND: With legal access to medical cannabis in Canada since 2001, there is a need to fully characterize its use at both the individual and population levels. We draw on data from Canada’s largest cohort study of medical cannabis to identify the primary reasons for medical cannabis authorizatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Cerina, Round, Jessica M., Klarenbach, Scott, Hanlon, John G., Hyshka, Elaine, Dyck, Jason R. B., Eurich, Dean T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00509-0
_version_ 1783704899635118080
author Lee, Cerina
Round, Jessica M.
Klarenbach, Scott
Hanlon, John G.
Hyshka, Elaine
Dyck, Jason R. B.
Eurich, Dean T.
author_facet Lee, Cerina
Round, Jessica M.
Klarenbach, Scott
Hanlon, John G.
Hyshka, Elaine
Dyck, Jason R. B.
Eurich, Dean T.
author_sort Lee, Cerina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With legal access to medical cannabis in Canada since 2001, there is a need to fully characterize its use at both the individual and population levels. We draw on data from Canada’s largest cohort study of medical cannabis to identify the primary reasons for medical cannabis authorization in Canada from 2014 to 2019 in two major provinces: Alberta (AB) and Ontario (ON), and review the extent that evidence supports each indication. METHODS: Self-reported baseline assessments were collected from adult patients in ON (n = 61,835) and AB (n = 3410) who were authorized medical cannabis. At baseline, sociodemographic, primary medical information, and validated clinical questionnaires were completed by patients as part of an individual assessment. Patients’ reasons for seeking medical cannabis were compared to published reviews and guidelines to assess the level of evidence supporting medical cannabis use for each condition. RESULTS: Medical cannabis use in both AB and ON was similar in both demographic and reason for authorization. The most common reasons for medical cannabis authorization were: (1) pain (AB = 77%, ON = 76%) primarily due to chronic musculoskeletal, arthritic, and neuropathic pain, (2) mental health concerns (AB = 32.9%, ON = 38.7%) due to anxiety and depression, and (3) sleep problems (AB = 28%, ON = 25%). More than 50 other conditions were identified as reasons for obtaining authorization. CONCLUSION: In both AB and ON, the majority of reasons for medical cannabis authorization are not substantiated by clinical evidence to fully support its efficacy for long-term use. Ongoing epidemiological studies on medical cannabis on these treatments are warranted to fully outline its treatment benefits or risks. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-021-00509-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8186125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81861252021-06-10 Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada Lee, Cerina Round, Jessica M. Klarenbach, Scott Hanlon, John G. Hyshka, Elaine Dyck, Jason R. B. Eurich, Dean T. Harm Reduct J Research BACKGROUND: With legal access to medical cannabis in Canada since 2001, there is a need to fully characterize its use at both the individual and population levels. We draw on data from Canada’s largest cohort study of medical cannabis to identify the primary reasons for medical cannabis authorization in Canada from 2014 to 2019 in two major provinces: Alberta (AB) and Ontario (ON), and review the extent that evidence supports each indication. METHODS: Self-reported baseline assessments were collected from adult patients in ON (n = 61,835) and AB (n = 3410) who were authorized medical cannabis. At baseline, sociodemographic, primary medical information, and validated clinical questionnaires were completed by patients as part of an individual assessment. Patients’ reasons for seeking medical cannabis were compared to published reviews and guidelines to assess the level of evidence supporting medical cannabis use for each condition. RESULTS: Medical cannabis use in both AB and ON was similar in both demographic and reason for authorization. The most common reasons for medical cannabis authorization were: (1) pain (AB = 77%, ON = 76%) primarily due to chronic musculoskeletal, arthritic, and neuropathic pain, (2) mental health concerns (AB = 32.9%, ON = 38.7%) due to anxiety and depression, and (3) sleep problems (AB = 28%, ON = 25%). More than 50 other conditions were identified as reasons for obtaining authorization. CONCLUSION: In both AB and ON, the majority of reasons for medical cannabis authorization are not substantiated by clinical evidence to fully support its efficacy for long-term use. Ongoing epidemiological studies on medical cannabis on these treatments are warranted to fully outline its treatment benefits or risks. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-021-00509-0. BioMed Central 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8186125/ /pubmed/34103058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00509-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lee, Cerina
Round, Jessica M.
Klarenbach, Scott
Hanlon, John G.
Hyshka, Elaine
Dyck, Jason R. B.
Eurich, Dean T.
Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada
title Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada
title_full Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada
title_fullStr Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada
title_full_unstemmed Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada
title_short Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada
title_sort gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: ontario and alberta, canada
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00509-0
work_keys_str_mv AT leecerina gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada
AT roundjessicam gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada
AT klarenbachscott gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada
AT hanlonjohng gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada
AT hyshkaelaine gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada
AT dyckjasonrb gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada
AT eurichdeant gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada