Cargando…

Comparison of the clinical effect between the lower sternal incision and the left parasternal fourth intercostal incision in the transthoracic closure of ventricular septal defect

BACKGROUND: To analyze the clinical effect of two different ways of minimally invasive transthoracic closure in children with ventricular septal defect (VSD). METHODS: From January 2015 to July 2019, 294 children with VSD were enrolled in the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital. Patients were d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Jun, Shangguan, Wenlin, Chen, Liang-Wan, Liao, Dong-shan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34099026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01543-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To analyze the clinical effect of two different ways of minimally invasive transthoracic closure in children with ventricular septal defect (VSD). METHODS: From January 2015 to July 2019, 294 children with VSD were enrolled in the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups – those who underwent VSD closure through the left sternal fourth intercostal incision (group A: n = 95) and the lower sternal incision (group B: n = 129). RESULTS: The operation time, bleeding volume, postoperative mechanical ventilation time, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring time, postoperative hospitalization time and complication rate in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the operation success rate, mechanical ventilation time and total hospitalization cost (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The transthoracic closure of ventricular septal defect through the left sternal fourth intercostal incision is feasible, safe, cosmetic, and worth popularizing.