Cargando…
Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers
PURPOSE: We recently described the validation of deep learning-based auto-segmented contour (DC) models for organs at risk (OAR) and clinical target volumes (CTV). In this study, we evaluate the performance of implemented DC models in the clinical radiotherapy (RT) planning workflow and report on us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01831-4 |
_version_ | 1783704913486807040 |
---|---|
author | Wong, Jordan Huang, Vicky Wells, Derek Giambattista, Joshua Giambattista, Jonathan Kolbeck, Carter Otto, Karl Saibishkumar, Elantholi P. Alexander, Abraham |
author_facet | Wong, Jordan Huang, Vicky Wells, Derek Giambattista, Joshua Giambattista, Jonathan Kolbeck, Carter Otto, Karl Saibishkumar, Elantholi P. Alexander, Abraham |
author_sort | Wong, Jordan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We recently described the validation of deep learning-based auto-segmented contour (DC) models for organs at risk (OAR) and clinical target volumes (CTV). In this study, we evaluate the performance of implemented DC models in the clinical radiotherapy (RT) planning workflow and report on user experience. METHODS AND MATERIALS: DC models were implemented at two cancer centers and used to generate OAR and CTVs for all patients undergoing RT for a central nervous system (CNS), head and neck (H&N), or prostate cancer. Radiation Therapists/Dosimetrists and Radiation Oncologists completed post-contouring surveys rating the degree of edits required for DCs (1 = minimal, 5 = significant) and overall DC satisfaction (1 = poor, 5 = high). Unedited DCs were compared to the edited treatment approved contours using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD). RESULTS: Between September 19, 2019 and March 6, 2020, DCs were generated on approximately 551 eligible cases. 203 surveys were collected on 27 CNS, 54 H&N, and 93 prostate RT plans, resulting in an overall survey compliance rate of 32%. The majority of OAR DCs required minimal edits subjectively (mean editing score ≤ 2) and objectively (mean DSC and 95% HD was ≥ 0.90 and ≤ 2.0 mm). Mean OAR satisfaction score was 4.1 for CNS, 4.4 for H&N, and 4.6 for prostate structures. Overall CTV satisfaction score (n = 25), which encompassed the prostate, seminal vesicles, and neck lymph node volumes, was 4.1. CONCLUSIONS: Previously validated OAR DC models for CNS, H&N, and prostate RT planning required minimal subjective and objective edits and resulted in a positive user experience, although low survey compliance was a concern. CTV DC model evaluation was even more limited, but high user satisfaction suggests that they may have served as appropriate starting points for patient specific edits. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01831-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8186196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81861962021-06-10 Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers Wong, Jordan Huang, Vicky Wells, Derek Giambattista, Joshua Giambattista, Jonathan Kolbeck, Carter Otto, Karl Saibishkumar, Elantholi P. Alexander, Abraham Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: We recently described the validation of deep learning-based auto-segmented contour (DC) models for organs at risk (OAR) and clinical target volumes (CTV). In this study, we evaluate the performance of implemented DC models in the clinical radiotherapy (RT) planning workflow and report on user experience. METHODS AND MATERIALS: DC models were implemented at two cancer centers and used to generate OAR and CTVs for all patients undergoing RT for a central nervous system (CNS), head and neck (H&N), or prostate cancer. Radiation Therapists/Dosimetrists and Radiation Oncologists completed post-contouring surveys rating the degree of edits required for DCs (1 = minimal, 5 = significant) and overall DC satisfaction (1 = poor, 5 = high). Unedited DCs were compared to the edited treatment approved contours using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD). RESULTS: Between September 19, 2019 and March 6, 2020, DCs were generated on approximately 551 eligible cases. 203 surveys were collected on 27 CNS, 54 H&N, and 93 prostate RT plans, resulting in an overall survey compliance rate of 32%. The majority of OAR DCs required minimal edits subjectively (mean editing score ≤ 2) and objectively (mean DSC and 95% HD was ≥ 0.90 and ≤ 2.0 mm). Mean OAR satisfaction score was 4.1 for CNS, 4.4 for H&N, and 4.6 for prostate structures. Overall CTV satisfaction score (n = 25), which encompassed the prostate, seminal vesicles, and neck lymph node volumes, was 4.1. CONCLUSIONS: Previously validated OAR DC models for CNS, H&N, and prostate RT planning required minimal subjective and objective edits and resulted in a positive user experience, although low survey compliance was a concern. CTV DC model evaluation was even more limited, but high user satisfaction suggests that they may have served as appropriate starting points for patient specific edits. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01831-4. BioMed Central 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8186196/ /pubmed/34103062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01831-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wong, Jordan Huang, Vicky Wells, Derek Giambattista, Joshua Giambattista, Jonathan Kolbeck, Carter Otto, Karl Saibishkumar, Elantholi P. Alexander, Abraham Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers |
title | Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers |
title_full | Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers |
title_fullStr | Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers |
title_short | Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers |
title_sort | implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01831-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wongjordan implementationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationforradiotherapyplanningstructuresaworkflowstudyattwocancercenters AT huangvicky implementationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationforradiotherapyplanningstructuresaworkflowstudyattwocancercenters AT wellsderek implementationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationforradiotherapyplanningstructuresaworkflowstudyattwocancercenters AT giambattistajoshua implementationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationforradiotherapyplanningstructuresaworkflowstudyattwocancercenters AT giambattistajonathan implementationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationforradiotherapyplanningstructuresaworkflowstudyattwocancercenters AT kolbeckcarter implementationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationforradiotherapyplanningstructuresaworkflowstudyattwocancercenters AT ottokarl implementationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationforradiotherapyplanningstructuresaworkflowstudyattwocancercenters AT saibishkumarelantholip implementationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationforradiotherapyplanningstructuresaworkflowstudyattwocancercenters AT alexanderabraham implementationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationforradiotherapyplanningstructuresaworkflowstudyattwocancercenters |