Cargando…

The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale

OBJECTIVE: The Palliative Performance Scale version 2 (PPSv2) is a useful tool designed to assess the performance status of palliative care patients. The aim of this study was to translate the PPSv2 into Turkish and to test the validity and reliability of Turkish PPSv2 (PPS-TR) in cancer patients re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oğuz, Gonca, Şenel, Gülçin, Koçak, Nesteren, Karaca, Şerife
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159234
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon-2111
_version_ 1783704946425724928
author Oğuz, Gonca
Şenel, Gülçin
Koçak, Nesteren
Karaca, Şerife
author_facet Oğuz, Gonca
Şenel, Gülçin
Koçak, Nesteren
Karaca, Şerife
author_sort Oğuz, Gonca
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The Palliative Performance Scale version 2 (PPSv2) is a useful tool designed to assess the performance status of palliative care patients. The aim of this study was to translate the PPSv2 into Turkish and to test the validity and reliability of Turkish PPSv2 (PPS-TR) in cancer patients receiving palliative care. METHODS: The translation of PPSv2 into Turkish was implemented using a forward–back forward procedure. The patients were allocated from inpatient palliative care unit, consultations from oncology services, palliative care polyclinic, and consultations from emergency unit. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities were tested in a pilot study with 51 patients. The cross-sectional study consisted of 280 patients. The relationship between PPS-TR, Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz ADL), and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was also measured. Construct validity was assessed by observing the test capacity across patient groups based on the place of care. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) at Time 1 and Time 2 were 0.982 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.972–0.989) and 0.991 (95% CI: 0.986–0.995). ICCs of intra-rater agreements were at least 0.956 (95% CI: 0.909–0.977) for three raters. KPS, Katz ADL, and PPS-TR scores of outpatients were significantly higher than those of inpatients and emergency. There was a perfect correlation between PPS-TR and KPS, while the correlation of PPS-TR with Katz ADL was almost perfect. CONCLUSIONS: The PPS-TR is a reliable and valid tool for assessment of performance status of cancer patients receiving palliative care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8186388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81863882021-06-21 The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale Oğuz, Gonca Şenel, Gülçin Koçak, Nesteren Karaca, Şerife Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs Original Article OBJECTIVE: The Palliative Performance Scale version 2 (PPSv2) is a useful tool designed to assess the performance status of palliative care patients. The aim of this study was to translate the PPSv2 into Turkish and to test the validity and reliability of Turkish PPSv2 (PPS-TR) in cancer patients receiving palliative care. METHODS: The translation of PPSv2 into Turkish was implemented using a forward–back forward procedure. The patients were allocated from inpatient palliative care unit, consultations from oncology services, palliative care polyclinic, and consultations from emergency unit. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities were tested in a pilot study with 51 patients. The cross-sectional study consisted of 280 patients. The relationship between PPS-TR, Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz ADL), and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was also measured. Construct validity was assessed by observing the test capacity across patient groups based on the place of care. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) at Time 1 and Time 2 were 0.982 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.972–0.989) and 0.991 (95% CI: 0.986–0.995). ICCs of intra-rater agreements were at least 0.956 (95% CI: 0.909–0.977) for three raters. KPS, Katz ADL, and PPS-TR scores of outpatients were significantly higher than those of inpatients and emergency. There was a perfect correlation between PPS-TR and KPS, while the correlation of PPS-TR with Katz ADL was almost perfect. CONCLUSIONS: The PPS-TR is a reliable and valid tool for assessment of performance status of cancer patients receiving palliative care. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8186388/ /pubmed/34159234 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon-2111 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Ann & Joshua Medical Publishing Co. Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Oğuz, Gonca
Şenel, Gülçin
Koçak, Nesteren
Karaca, Şerife
The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale
title The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale
title_full The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale
title_fullStr The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale
title_full_unstemmed The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale
title_short The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale
title_sort turkish validity and reliability study of palliative performance scale
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159234
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon-2111
work_keys_str_mv AT oguzgonca theturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale
AT senelgulcin theturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale
AT kocaknesteren theturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale
AT karacaserife theturkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale
AT oguzgonca turkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale
AT senelgulcin turkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale
AT kocaknesteren turkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale
AT karacaserife turkishvalidityandreliabilitystudyofpalliativeperformancescale