Cargando…

Retinoblastoma in twins: Risk assessment of genotypic variants

PURPOSE: To describe methods of risk assessment in twins with retinoblastoma (RB). METHODS: A case series of four RB probands with a twin sibling. Family status, clinical presentation, and RB1 germline status-based risk assessment were analyzed. RESULTS: Two pairs had a positive family history (unil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raval, Vishal, DeBenedictis, Meghan, Bowen, Randy, Soto, Hansell, Davanzo, Jacquelyn, Singh, Arun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33913866
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2811_20
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To describe methods of risk assessment in twins with retinoblastoma (RB). METHODS: A case series of four RB probands with a twin sibling. Family status, clinical presentation, and RB1 germline status-based risk assessment were analyzed. RESULTS: Two pairs had a positive family history (unilateral and bilateral RB in one of the parents (#1 and #2, respectively) and two pairs (#3 and #4) were sporadic. One of the familial twins (#1) had a high risk (90%) of manifesting RB in the twin. The other case (#2) with an absent RB1 germline mutation in the twin had a 0% risk of developing RB. Among sporadic cases of twins (#3), genetic testing did not identify a germline mutation (tumor sample unavailable) in the proband which downgraded the risk of germline mutation from 15% to <1%. The twin never developed RB (5 years of age at last follow-up). Pathogenic mosaicism for germline RB1 mutation (c.1723C>T) could be identified (tumor tissue available) in the proband (# 4). Identical germline mutation (and RB tumor) was also noted in the twin. In each case, there was concordance between the assessed risk and manifestation of RB. CONCLUSION: Assessment of risk of RB in a twin presents with a unique challenge. Depending upon the genotype variant, the risk of developing RB can vary from 0% to 90%. In addition to family history, clinical manifestation in the proband, zygosity status, and RB1 germline status are critical in formulating risk-appropriate surveillance guidelines.