Cargando…

Laterally Extended Endopelvic Resection Versus Chemo or Targeted Therapy Alone for Pelvic Sidewall Recurrence of Cervical Cancer

BACKGROUND: Laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER) has been introduced for treatment of pelvic sidewall recurrence of cervical cancer (PSRCC), which occurs in only 8% of patients with relapsed cervical cancer. LEER can only be performed by a proficient surgeon due to the high risk of surgica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Soo Jin, Mun, Jaehee, Lee, Seungmee, Luo, Yanlin, Chung, Hyun Hoon, Kim, Jae-Weon, Park, Noh Hyun, Song, Yong Sang, Kim, Hee Seung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113571
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.683441
_version_ 1783705015910662144
author Park, Soo Jin
Mun, Jaehee
Lee, Seungmee
Luo, Yanlin
Chung, Hyun Hoon
Kim, Jae-Weon
Park, Noh Hyun
Song, Yong Sang
Kim, Hee Seung
author_facet Park, Soo Jin
Mun, Jaehee
Lee, Seungmee
Luo, Yanlin
Chung, Hyun Hoon
Kim, Jae-Weon
Park, Noh Hyun
Song, Yong Sang
Kim, Hee Seung
author_sort Park, Soo Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER) has been introduced for treatment of pelvic sidewall recurrence of cervical cancer (PSRCC), which occurs in only 8% of patients with relapsed cervical cancer. LEER can only be performed by a proficient surgeon due to the high risk of surgical morbidity and mortality, but there is no evidence as to whether LEER is may be more effective than chemo or targeted therapy alone for PSRCC. Thus, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between LEER and chemo or targeted therapy alone for treatment of PSRCC. METHODS: We prospectively recruited patients with PSRCC who underwent LEER between December 2016 and December 2019. Moreover, we retrospectively collected data on patients with PSRCC who received chemo or targeted therapy alone between January 2000 and December 2019. We compared treatment-free interval (TFI), progression-free survival (PFS), treatment-free survival (TFS), overall survival (OS), tumor response, neurologic disturbance of the low extremities, and pelvic pain severity in the different patient groups. RESULTS: Among 1295 patients with cervical cancer, we included 28 (2.2%) and 31 (2.4%) in the prospective and retrospective cohorts, respectively. When we subdivided all patients into two groups based on the median value of prior TFI (PTFI, 9.2 months), LEER improved TFI, PFS, TRS and OS compared to chemo or targeted therapy alone (median, 2.8 vs. 0.9; 7.4 vs. 4.1; 30.1 vs. 16.9 months; P ≤ 0.05) in patients with PTFI < 9.2 months despite no difference in survival in those with PTFI ≥ 9.2 months, suggesting that LEER may lead to better TFI, PFS, TRS and OS in patients with PTFI < 9.2 months (adjusted hazard ratios, 0.28, 0.27, 0.44 and 0.37; 95% confidence intervals, 0.12-0.68, 0.11-0.66, 0.18-0.83 and 0.15-0.88). Furthermore, LEER markedly reduced the number of morphine milligram equivalents necessary to reduce pelvic pain when compared with chemo or targeted therapy alone. CONCLUSION: Compared to chemo or targeted therapy alone, LEER improved survival in patients with PSRCC and PTFI < 9.2 months, and it was effective at controlling the pelvic pain associated with PSRCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02986568.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8186785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81867852021-06-09 Laterally Extended Endopelvic Resection Versus Chemo or Targeted Therapy Alone for Pelvic Sidewall Recurrence of Cervical Cancer Park, Soo Jin Mun, Jaehee Lee, Seungmee Luo, Yanlin Chung, Hyun Hoon Kim, Jae-Weon Park, Noh Hyun Song, Yong Sang Kim, Hee Seung Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER) has been introduced for treatment of pelvic sidewall recurrence of cervical cancer (PSRCC), which occurs in only 8% of patients with relapsed cervical cancer. LEER can only be performed by a proficient surgeon due to the high risk of surgical morbidity and mortality, but there is no evidence as to whether LEER is may be more effective than chemo or targeted therapy alone for PSRCC. Thus, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between LEER and chemo or targeted therapy alone for treatment of PSRCC. METHODS: We prospectively recruited patients with PSRCC who underwent LEER between December 2016 and December 2019. Moreover, we retrospectively collected data on patients with PSRCC who received chemo or targeted therapy alone between January 2000 and December 2019. We compared treatment-free interval (TFI), progression-free survival (PFS), treatment-free survival (TFS), overall survival (OS), tumor response, neurologic disturbance of the low extremities, and pelvic pain severity in the different patient groups. RESULTS: Among 1295 patients with cervical cancer, we included 28 (2.2%) and 31 (2.4%) in the prospective and retrospective cohorts, respectively. When we subdivided all patients into two groups based on the median value of prior TFI (PTFI, 9.2 months), LEER improved TFI, PFS, TRS and OS compared to chemo or targeted therapy alone (median, 2.8 vs. 0.9; 7.4 vs. 4.1; 30.1 vs. 16.9 months; P ≤ 0.05) in patients with PTFI < 9.2 months despite no difference in survival in those with PTFI ≥ 9.2 months, suggesting that LEER may lead to better TFI, PFS, TRS and OS in patients with PTFI < 9.2 months (adjusted hazard ratios, 0.28, 0.27, 0.44 and 0.37; 95% confidence intervals, 0.12-0.68, 0.11-0.66, 0.18-0.83 and 0.15-0.88). Furthermore, LEER markedly reduced the number of morphine milligram equivalents necessary to reduce pelvic pain when compared with chemo or targeted therapy alone. CONCLUSION: Compared to chemo or targeted therapy alone, LEER improved survival in patients with PSRCC and PTFI < 9.2 months, and it was effective at controlling the pelvic pain associated with PSRCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02986568. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8186785/ /pubmed/34113571 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.683441 Text en Copyright © 2021 Park, Mun, Lee, Luo, Chung, Kim, Park, Song and Kim https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Park, Soo Jin
Mun, Jaehee
Lee, Seungmee
Luo, Yanlin
Chung, Hyun Hoon
Kim, Jae-Weon
Park, Noh Hyun
Song, Yong Sang
Kim, Hee Seung
Laterally Extended Endopelvic Resection Versus Chemo or Targeted Therapy Alone for Pelvic Sidewall Recurrence of Cervical Cancer
title Laterally Extended Endopelvic Resection Versus Chemo or Targeted Therapy Alone for Pelvic Sidewall Recurrence of Cervical Cancer
title_full Laterally Extended Endopelvic Resection Versus Chemo or Targeted Therapy Alone for Pelvic Sidewall Recurrence of Cervical Cancer
title_fullStr Laterally Extended Endopelvic Resection Versus Chemo or Targeted Therapy Alone for Pelvic Sidewall Recurrence of Cervical Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Laterally Extended Endopelvic Resection Versus Chemo or Targeted Therapy Alone for Pelvic Sidewall Recurrence of Cervical Cancer
title_short Laterally Extended Endopelvic Resection Versus Chemo or Targeted Therapy Alone for Pelvic Sidewall Recurrence of Cervical Cancer
title_sort laterally extended endopelvic resection versus chemo or targeted therapy alone for pelvic sidewall recurrence of cervical cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113571
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.683441
work_keys_str_mv AT parksoojin laterallyextendedendopelvicresectionversuschemoortargetedtherapyaloneforpelvicsidewallrecurrenceofcervicalcancer
AT munjaehee laterallyextendedendopelvicresectionversuschemoortargetedtherapyaloneforpelvicsidewallrecurrenceofcervicalcancer
AT leeseungmee laterallyextendedendopelvicresectionversuschemoortargetedtherapyaloneforpelvicsidewallrecurrenceofcervicalcancer
AT luoyanlin laterallyextendedendopelvicresectionversuschemoortargetedtherapyaloneforpelvicsidewallrecurrenceofcervicalcancer
AT chunghyunhoon laterallyextendedendopelvicresectionversuschemoortargetedtherapyaloneforpelvicsidewallrecurrenceofcervicalcancer
AT kimjaeweon laterallyextendedendopelvicresectionversuschemoortargetedtherapyaloneforpelvicsidewallrecurrenceofcervicalcancer
AT parknohhyun laterallyextendedendopelvicresectionversuschemoortargetedtherapyaloneforpelvicsidewallrecurrenceofcervicalcancer
AT songyongsang laterallyextendedendopelvicresectionversuschemoortargetedtherapyaloneforpelvicsidewallrecurrenceofcervicalcancer
AT kimheeseung laterallyextendedendopelvicresectionversuschemoortargetedtherapyaloneforpelvicsidewallrecurrenceofcervicalcancer