Cargando…

Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen

In this study, topology optimized, patient specific osteosynthesis plates (TOPOS-implants) are evaluated for the mandibular reconstruction using fibula segments. These shape optimized implants are compared to a standard treatment with miniplates (thickness: 1.0 mm, titanium grade 4) in biomechanical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lang, Jan J., Bastian, Mirjam, Foehr, Peter, Seebach, Michael, Weitz, Jochen, von Deimling, Constantin, Schwaiger, Benedikt J., Micheler, Carina M., Wilhelm, Nikolas J., Grosse, Christian U., Kesting, Marco, Burgkart, Rainer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253002
_version_ 1783705019375157248
author Lang, Jan J.
Bastian, Mirjam
Foehr, Peter
Seebach, Michael
Weitz, Jochen
von Deimling, Constantin
Schwaiger, Benedikt J.
Micheler, Carina M.
Wilhelm, Nikolas J.
Grosse, Christian U.
Kesting, Marco
Burgkart, Rainer
author_facet Lang, Jan J.
Bastian, Mirjam
Foehr, Peter
Seebach, Michael
Weitz, Jochen
von Deimling, Constantin
Schwaiger, Benedikt J.
Micheler, Carina M.
Wilhelm, Nikolas J.
Grosse, Christian U.
Kesting, Marco
Burgkart, Rainer
author_sort Lang, Jan J.
collection PubMed
description In this study, topology optimized, patient specific osteosynthesis plates (TOPOS-implants) are evaluated for the mandibular reconstruction using fibula segments. These shape optimized implants are compared to a standard treatment with miniplates (thickness: 1.0 mm, titanium grade 4) in biomechanical testing using human cadaveric specimen. Mandible and fibula of 21 body donors were used. Geometrical models were created based on automated segmentation of CT-scans of all specimens. All reconstructions, including cutting guides for osteotomy as well as TOPOS-implants, were planned using a custom-made software tool. The TOPOS-implants were produced by electron beam melting (thickness: 1.0 mm, titanium grade 5). The fibula-reconstructed mandibles were tested in static and dynamic testing in a multi-axial test system, which can adapt to the donor anatomy and apply side-specific loads. Static testing was used to confirm mechanical similarity between the reconstruction groups. Force-controlled dynamic testing was performed with a sinusoidal loading between 60 and 240 N (reconstructed side: 30% reduction to consider resected muscles) at 5 Hz for up to 5 · 10(5) cycles. There was a significant difference between the groups for dynamic testing: All TOPOS-implants stayed intact during all cycles, while miniplate failure occurred after 26.4% of the planned loading (1.32 · 10(5) ± 1.46 · 10(5) cycles). Bone fracture occurred in both groups (miniplates: n = 3, TOPOS-implants: n = 2). A correlation between bone failure and cortical bone thickness in mandible angle as well as the number of bicortical screws used was demonstrated. For both groups no screw failure was detected. In conclusion, the topology optimized, patient specific implants showed superior fatigue properties compared to miniplates in mandibular reconstruction. Additionally, the patient specific shape comes with intrinsic guiding properties to support the reconstruction process during surgery. This demonstrates that the combination of additive manufacturing and topology optimization can be beneficial for future maxillofacial surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8186800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81868002021-06-16 Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen Lang, Jan J. Bastian, Mirjam Foehr, Peter Seebach, Michael Weitz, Jochen von Deimling, Constantin Schwaiger, Benedikt J. Micheler, Carina M. Wilhelm, Nikolas J. Grosse, Christian U. Kesting, Marco Burgkart, Rainer PLoS One Research Article In this study, topology optimized, patient specific osteosynthesis plates (TOPOS-implants) are evaluated for the mandibular reconstruction using fibula segments. These shape optimized implants are compared to a standard treatment with miniplates (thickness: 1.0 mm, titanium grade 4) in biomechanical testing using human cadaveric specimen. Mandible and fibula of 21 body donors were used. Geometrical models were created based on automated segmentation of CT-scans of all specimens. All reconstructions, including cutting guides for osteotomy as well as TOPOS-implants, were planned using a custom-made software tool. The TOPOS-implants were produced by electron beam melting (thickness: 1.0 mm, titanium grade 5). The fibula-reconstructed mandibles were tested in static and dynamic testing in a multi-axial test system, which can adapt to the donor anatomy and apply side-specific loads. Static testing was used to confirm mechanical similarity between the reconstruction groups. Force-controlled dynamic testing was performed with a sinusoidal loading between 60 and 240 N (reconstructed side: 30% reduction to consider resected muscles) at 5 Hz for up to 5 · 10(5) cycles. There was a significant difference between the groups for dynamic testing: All TOPOS-implants stayed intact during all cycles, while miniplate failure occurred after 26.4% of the planned loading (1.32 · 10(5) ± 1.46 · 10(5) cycles). Bone fracture occurred in both groups (miniplates: n = 3, TOPOS-implants: n = 2). A correlation between bone failure and cortical bone thickness in mandible angle as well as the number of bicortical screws used was demonstrated. For both groups no screw failure was detected. In conclusion, the topology optimized, patient specific implants showed superior fatigue properties compared to miniplates in mandibular reconstruction. Additionally, the patient specific shape comes with intrinsic guiding properties to support the reconstruction process during surgery. This demonstrates that the combination of additive manufacturing and topology optimization can be beneficial for future maxillofacial surgery. Public Library of Science 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8186800/ /pubmed/34101755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253002 Text en © 2021 Lang et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lang, Jan J.
Bastian, Mirjam
Foehr, Peter
Seebach, Michael
Weitz, Jochen
von Deimling, Constantin
Schwaiger, Benedikt J.
Micheler, Carina M.
Wilhelm, Nikolas J.
Grosse, Christian U.
Kesting, Marco
Burgkart, Rainer
Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen
title Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen
title_full Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen
title_fullStr Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen
title_full_unstemmed Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen
title_short Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen
title_sort improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—a biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253002
work_keys_str_mv AT langjanj improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen
AT bastianmirjam improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen
AT foehrpeter improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen
AT seebachmichael improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen
AT weitzjochen improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen
AT vondeimlingconstantin improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen
AT schwaigerbenediktj improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen
AT michelercarinam improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen
AT wilhelmnikolasj improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen
AT grossechristianu improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen
AT kestingmarco improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen
AT burgkartrainer improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen