Cargando…
Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen
In this study, topology optimized, patient specific osteosynthesis plates (TOPOS-implants) are evaluated for the mandibular reconstruction using fibula segments. These shape optimized implants are compared to a standard treatment with miniplates (thickness: 1.0 mm, titanium grade 4) in biomechanical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253002 |
_version_ | 1783705019375157248 |
---|---|
author | Lang, Jan J. Bastian, Mirjam Foehr, Peter Seebach, Michael Weitz, Jochen von Deimling, Constantin Schwaiger, Benedikt J. Micheler, Carina M. Wilhelm, Nikolas J. Grosse, Christian U. Kesting, Marco Burgkart, Rainer |
author_facet | Lang, Jan J. Bastian, Mirjam Foehr, Peter Seebach, Michael Weitz, Jochen von Deimling, Constantin Schwaiger, Benedikt J. Micheler, Carina M. Wilhelm, Nikolas J. Grosse, Christian U. Kesting, Marco Burgkart, Rainer |
author_sort | Lang, Jan J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, topology optimized, patient specific osteosynthesis plates (TOPOS-implants) are evaluated for the mandibular reconstruction using fibula segments. These shape optimized implants are compared to a standard treatment with miniplates (thickness: 1.0 mm, titanium grade 4) in biomechanical testing using human cadaveric specimen. Mandible and fibula of 21 body donors were used. Geometrical models were created based on automated segmentation of CT-scans of all specimens. All reconstructions, including cutting guides for osteotomy as well as TOPOS-implants, were planned using a custom-made software tool. The TOPOS-implants were produced by electron beam melting (thickness: 1.0 mm, titanium grade 5). The fibula-reconstructed mandibles were tested in static and dynamic testing in a multi-axial test system, which can adapt to the donor anatomy and apply side-specific loads. Static testing was used to confirm mechanical similarity between the reconstruction groups. Force-controlled dynamic testing was performed with a sinusoidal loading between 60 and 240 N (reconstructed side: 30% reduction to consider resected muscles) at 5 Hz for up to 5 · 10(5) cycles. There was a significant difference between the groups for dynamic testing: All TOPOS-implants stayed intact during all cycles, while miniplate failure occurred after 26.4% of the planned loading (1.32 · 10(5) ± 1.46 · 10(5) cycles). Bone fracture occurred in both groups (miniplates: n = 3, TOPOS-implants: n = 2). A correlation between bone failure and cortical bone thickness in mandible angle as well as the number of bicortical screws used was demonstrated. For both groups no screw failure was detected. In conclusion, the topology optimized, patient specific implants showed superior fatigue properties compared to miniplates in mandibular reconstruction. Additionally, the patient specific shape comes with intrinsic guiding properties to support the reconstruction process during surgery. This demonstrates that the combination of additive manufacturing and topology optimization can be beneficial for future maxillofacial surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8186800 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81868002021-06-16 Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen Lang, Jan J. Bastian, Mirjam Foehr, Peter Seebach, Michael Weitz, Jochen von Deimling, Constantin Schwaiger, Benedikt J. Micheler, Carina M. Wilhelm, Nikolas J. Grosse, Christian U. Kesting, Marco Burgkart, Rainer PLoS One Research Article In this study, topology optimized, patient specific osteosynthesis plates (TOPOS-implants) are evaluated for the mandibular reconstruction using fibula segments. These shape optimized implants are compared to a standard treatment with miniplates (thickness: 1.0 mm, titanium grade 4) in biomechanical testing using human cadaveric specimen. Mandible and fibula of 21 body donors were used. Geometrical models were created based on automated segmentation of CT-scans of all specimens. All reconstructions, including cutting guides for osteotomy as well as TOPOS-implants, were planned using a custom-made software tool. The TOPOS-implants were produced by electron beam melting (thickness: 1.0 mm, titanium grade 5). The fibula-reconstructed mandibles were tested in static and dynamic testing in a multi-axial test system, which can adapt to the donor anatomy and apply side-specific loads. Static testing was used to confirm mechanical similarity between the reconstruction groups. Force-controlled dynamic testing was performed with a sinusoidal loading between 60 and 240 N (reconstructed side: 30% reduction to consider resected muscles) at 5 Hz for up to 5 · 10(5) cycles. There was a significant difference between the groups for dynamic testing: All TOPOS-implants stayed intact during all cycles, while miniplate failure occurred after 26.4% of the planned loading (1.32 · 10(5) ± 1.46 · 10(5) cycles). Bone fracture occurred in both groups (miniplates: n = 3, TOPOS-implants: n = 2). A correlation between bone failure and cortical bone thickness in mandible angle as well as the number of bicortical screws used was demonstrated. For both groups no screw failure was detected. In conclusion, the topology optimized, patient specific implants showed superior fatigue properties compared to miniplates in mandibular reconstruction. Additionally, the patient specific shape comes with intrinsic guiding properties to support the reconstruction process during surgery. This demonstrates that the combination of additive manufacturing and topology optimization can be beneficial for future maxillofacial surgery. Public Library of Science 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8186800/ /pubmed/34101755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253002 Text en © 2021 Lang et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lang, Jan J. Bastian, Mirjam Foehr, Peter Seebach, Michael Weitz, Jochen von Deimling, Constantin Schwaiger, Benedikt J. Micheler, Carina M. Wilhelm, Nikolas J. Grosse, Christian U. Kesting, Marco Burgkart, Rainer Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen |
title | Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen |
title_full | Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen |
title_fullStr | Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen |
title_short | Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen |
title_sort | improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?—a biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langjanj improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen AT bastianmirjam improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen AT foehrpeter improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen AT seebachmichael improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen AT weitzjochen improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen AT vondeimlingconstantin improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen AT schwaigerbenediktj improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen AT michelercarinam improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen AT wilhelmnikolasj improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen AT grossechristianu improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen AT kestingmarco improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen AT burgkartrainer improvingmandibularreconstructionbyusingtopologyoptimizationpatientspecificdesignandadditivemanufacturingabiomechanicalcomparisonagainstminiplatesonhumanspecimen |