Cargando…

Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Pushing Splints 3 (PS3) device was recently introduced for the treatment of Class III malocclusion in children. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect on the sagittal maxillary position (SNA, primary outcome) of PS3 therapy compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy (RME/FM)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galeotti, Angela, Martina, Stefano, Viarani, Valeria, Franchi, Lorenzo, Rongo, Roberto, D’Antò, Vincenzo, Festa, Paola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33313718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaa076
_version_ 1783705025412857856
author Galeotti, Angela
Martina, Stefano
Viarani, Valeria
Franchi, Lorenzo
Rongo, Roberto
D’Antò, Vincenzo
Festa, Paola
author_facet Galeotti, Angela
Martina, Stefano
Viarani, Valeria
Franchi, Lorenzo
Rongo, Roberto
D’Antò, Vincenzo
Festa, Paola
author_sort Galeotti, Angela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pushing Splints 3 (PS3) device was recently introduced for the treatment of Class III malocclusion in children. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect on the sagittal maxillary position (SNA, primary outcome) of PS3 therapy compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy (RME/FM) and to compare skeletal and dento-alveolar effects in growing Class III patients. TRIAL DESIGN: This trial was a single-centre randomized controlled trial with two groups randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio of equal size by sealed-envelope randomization, conducted at the Dentistry Unit of Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS (Rome, Italy). METHODS: A total of 48 patients with Class III malocclusion were included in the study and randomly allocated to the two groups: PS3 therapy and RME/FM therapy. Only the RME/FM group underwent palatal expansion, and both groups were instructed to wear the appliances 14 hours/day. Pre- (T0) and post-treatment (T1) cephalograms were taken. An independent sample t-test and regression analysis were used to analyse the data (P value <0.05). Researchers involved in statistics and tracings were blinded to the treatment allocation. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients (21 for each group) completed the study. The maxillary sagittal position improved similarly in both groups (SNA = 0.4°; P = 0.547). A statistically significant decrease of SNPg angle (−1.6°; P < 0.001) and increase of ANPg angle (1.4°; P = 0.018) were found in the RME/FM group compared with PS3 group. CoGoMe angle significantly decreased in RME/FM group compared with PS3 group (−1.7°; P = 0.042). The regression analysis showed an association between SN/MP angle at T0 and the differences between T1 and T0 of SNPg (B = 0.13; P = 0.005) and SN/MP (B = −0.19; P = 0.034). Only three patients (PS3 = 2; RME/FM = 1) had breakages of the devices. LIMITATIONS: Results are limited to short-term effects. CONCLUSION: RME/FM therapy and PS3 are both effective therapies for the early correction of Class III malocclusion. The PS3 controlled better mandibular divergency reducing the clockwise rotation in patients with higher mandibular inclination. REGISTRATION: This study was not registered in a clinical trial registry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8186836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81868362021-06-09 Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial Galeotti, Angela Martina, Stefano Viarani, Valeria Franchi, Lorenzo Rongo, Roberto D’Antò, Vincenzo Festa, Paola Eur J Orthod Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) BACKGROUND: Pushing Splints 3 (PS3) device was recently introduced for the treatment of Class III malocclusion in children. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect on the sagittal maxillary position (SNA, primary outcome) of PS3 therapy compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy (RME/FM) and to compare skeletal and dento-alveolar effects in growing Class III patients. TRIAL DESIGN: This trial was a single-centre randomized controlled trial with two groups randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio of equal size by sealed-envelope randomization, conducted at the Dentistry Unit of Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS (Rome, Italy). METHODS: A total of 48 patients with Class III malocclusion were included in the study and randomly allocated to the two groups: PS3 therapy and RME/FM therapy. Only the RME/FM group underwent palatal expansion, and both groups were instructed to wear the appliances 14 hours/day. Pre- (T0) and post-treatment (T1) cephalograms were taken. An independent sample t-test and regression analysis were used to analyse the data (P value <0.05). Researchers involved in statistics and tracings were blinded to the treatment allocation. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients (21 for each group) completed the study. The maxillary sagittal position improved similarly in both groups (SNA = 0.4°; P = 0.547). A statistically significant decrease of SNPg angle (−1.6°; P < 0.001) and increase of ANPg angle (1.4°; P = 0.018) were found in the RME/FM group compared with PS3 group. CoGoMe angle significantly decreased in RME/FM group compared with PS3 group (−1.7°; P = 0.042). The regression analysis showed an association between SN/MP angle at T0 and the differences between T1 and T0 of SNPg (B = 0.13; P = 0.005) and SN/MP (B = −0.19; P = 0.034). Only three patients (PS3 = 2; RME/FM = 1) had breakages of the devices. LIMITATIONS: Results are limited to short-term effects. CONCLUSION: RME/FM therapy and PS3 are both effective therapies for the early correction of Class III malocclusion. The PS3 controlled better mandibular divergency reducing the clockwise rotation in patients with higher mandibular inclination. REGISTRATION: This study was not registered in a clinical trial registry. Oxford University Press 2020-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8186836/ /pubmed/33313718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaa076 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Galeotti, Angela
Martina, Stefano
Viarani, Valeria
Franchi, Lorenzo
Rongo, Roberto
D’Antò, Vincenzo
Festa, Paola
Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial
title Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort cephalometric effects of pushing splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in class iii malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial
topic Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8186836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33313718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaa076
work_keys_str_mv AT galeottiangela cephalometriceffectsofpushingsplints3comparedwithrapidmaxillaryexpansionandfacemasktherapyinclassiiimalocclusionchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT martinastefano cephalometriceffectsofpushingsplints3comparedwithrapidmaxillaryexpansionandfacemasktherapyinclassiiimalocclusionchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT viaranivaleria cephalometriceffectsofpushingsplints3comparedwithrapidmaxillaryexpansionandfacemasktherapyinclassiiimalocclusionchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT franchilorenzo cephalometriceffectsofpushingsplints3comparedwithrapidmaxillaryexpansionandfacemasktherapyinclassiiimalocclusionchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rongoroberto cephalometriceffectsofpushingsplints3comparedwithrapidmaxillaryexpansionandfacemasktherapyinclassiiimalocclusionchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dantovincenzo cephalometriceffectsofpushingsplints3comparedwithrapidmaxillaryexpansionandfacemasktherapyinclassiiimalocclusionchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT festapaola cephalometriceffectsofpushingsplints3comparedwithrapidmaxillaryexpansionandfacemasktherapyinclassiiimalocclusionchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial