Cargando…

Blood Biomarkers Predict Cardiac Workload Using Machine Learning

INTRODUCTION: Rate pressure product (the product of heart rate and systolic blood pressure) is a measure of cardiac workload. Resting rate pressure product (rRPP) varies from one individual to the next, but its biochemical/cellular phenotype remains unknown. This study determined the degree to which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shou, Lan, Huang, Wendy Wenyu, Barszczyk, Andrew, Wu, Si Jia, Han, Helen, Waese-Perlman, Alex, Chen, Lulu, Wei, Jing, Luo, Hong, Lee, Kang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8187049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6172815
_version_ 1783705065810296832
author Shou, Lan
Huang, Wendy Wenyu
Barszczyk, Andrew
Wu, Si Jia
Han, Helen
Waese-Perlman, Alex
Chen, Lulu
Wei, Jing
Luo, Hong
Lee, Kang
author_facet Shou, Lan
Huang, Wendy Wenyu
Barszczyk, Andrew
Wu, Si Jia
Han, Helen
Waese-Perlman, Alex
Chen, Lulu
Wei, Jing
Luo, Hong
Lee, Kang
author_sort Shou, Lan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Rate pressure product (the product of heart rate and systolic blood pressure) is a measure of cardiac workload. Resting rate pressure product (rRPP) varies from one individual to the next, but its biochemical/cellular phenotype remains unknown. This study determined the degree to which an individual's biochemical/cellular profile as characterized by a standard blood panel is predictive of rRPP, as well the importance of each blood biomarker in this prediction. METHODS: We included data from 55,730 participants in this study with complete rRPP measurements and concurrently collected blood panel information from the Health Management Centre at the Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University. We used the XGBoost machine learning algorithm to train a tree-based model and then assessed its accuracy on an independent portion of the dataset and then compared its performance against a standard linear regression technique. We further determined the predictive importance of each feature in the blood panel. RESULTS: We found a fair positive correlation (Pearson r) of 0.377 (95% CI: 0.375-0.378) between observed rRPP and rRPP predicted from blood biomarkers. By comparison, the performance for standard linear regression was 0.352 (95% CI: 0.351-0.354). The top three predictors in this model were glucose concentration, total protein concentration, and neutrophil count. Discussion/ CONCLUSION: Blood biomarkers predict resting RPP when modeled in combination with one another; such models are valuable for studying the complex interrelations between resting cardiac workload and one's biochemical/cellular phenotype.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8187049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81870492021-06-21 Blood Biomarkers Predict Cardiac Workload Using Machine Learning Shou, Lan Huang, Wendy Wenyu Barszczyk, Andrew Wu, Si Jia Han, Helen Waese-Perlman, Alex Chen, Lulu Wei, Jing Luo, Hong Lee, Kang Biomed Res Int Research Article INTRODUCTION: Rate pressure product (the product of heart rate and systolic blood pressure) is a measure of cardiac workload. Resting rate pressure product (rRPP) varies from one individual to the next, but its biochemical/cellular phenotype remains unknown. This study determined the degree to which an individual's biochemical/cellular profile as characterized by a standard blood panel is predictive of rRPP, as well the importance of each blood biomarker in this prediction. METHODS: We included data from 55,730 participants in this study with complete rRPP measurements and concurrently collected blood panel information from the Health Management Centre at the Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University. We used the XGBoost machine learning algorithm to train a tree-based model and then assessed its accuracy on an independent portion of the dataset and then compared its performance against a standard linear regression technique. We further determined the predictive importance of each feature in the blood panel. RESULTS: We found a fair positive correlation (Pearson r) of 0.377 (95% CI: 0.375-0.378) between observed rRPP and rRPP predicted from blood biomarkers. By comparison, the performance for standard linear regression was 0.352 (95% CI: 0.351-0.354). The top three predictors in this model were glucose concentration, total protein concentration, and neutrophil count. Discussion/ CONCLUSION: Blood biomarkers predict resting RPP when modeled in combination with one another; such models are valuable for studying the complex interrelations between resting cardiac workload and one's biochemical/cellular phenotype. Hindawi 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8187049/ /pubmed/34159195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6172815 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lan Shou et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shou, Lan
Huang, Wendy Wenyu
Barszczyk, Andrew
Wu, Si Jia
Han, Helen
Waese-Perlman, Alex
Chen, Lulu
Wei, Jing
Luo, Hong
Lee, Kang
Blood Biomarkers Predict Cardiac Workload Using Machine Learning
title Blood Biomarkers Predict Cardiac Workload Using Machine Learning
title_full Blood Biomarkers Predict Cardiac Workload Using Machine Learning
title_fullStr Blood Biomarkers Predict Cardiac Workload Using Machine Learning
title_full_unstemmed Blood Biomarkers Predict Cardiac Workload Using Machine Learning
title_short Blood Biomarkers Predict Cardiac Workload Using Machine Learning
title_sort blood biomarkers predict cardiac workload using machine learning
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8187049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6172815
work_keys_str_mv AT shoulan bloodbiomarkerspredictcardiacworkloadusingmachinelearning
AT huangwendywenyu bloodbiomarkerspredictcardiacworkloadusingmachinelearning
AT barszczykandrew bloodbiomarkerspredictcardiacworkloadusingmachinelearning
AT wusijia bloodbiomarkerspredictcardiacworkloadusingmachinelearning
AT hanhelen bloodbiomarkerspredictcardiacworkloadusingmachinelearning
AT waeseperlmanalex bloodbiomarkerspredictcardiacworkloadusingmachinelearning
AT chenlulu bloodbiomarkerspredictcardiacworkloadusingmachinelearning
AT weijing bloodbiomarkerspredictcardiacworkloadusingmachinelearning
AT luohong bloodbiomarkerspredictcardiacworkloadusingmachinelearning
AT leekang bloodbiomarkerspredictcardiacworkloadusingmachinelearning