Cargando…
The impact of different first-line EGFR-TKIs on the clinical outcome of sequential osimertinib treatment in advanced NSCLC with secondary T790M
The impact of different first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)s to the clinical efficacy of osimertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with acquired T790M was still unclear. We enrolled 733 advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8187359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91657-7 |
_version_ | 1783705113916866560 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Yen-Hsiang Tseng, Jeng-Sen Hsu, Kuo-Hsuan Chen, Kun-Chieh Su, Kang-Yi Yu, Sung-Liang Chen, Jeremy J. W. Yang, Tsung-Ying Chang, Gee-Chen |
author_facet | Huang, Yen-Hsiang Tseng, Jeng-Sen Hsu, Kuo-Hsuan Chen, Kun-Chieh Su, Kang-Yi Yu, Sung-Liang Chen, Jeremy J. W. Yang, Tsung-Ying Chang, Gee-Chen |
author_sort | Huang, Yen-Hsiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | The impact of different first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)s to the clinical efficacy of osimertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with acquired T790M was still unclear. We enrolled 733 advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib as first-line EGFR-TKIs treatment for analysis. 373 patients received re-biopsies after progressive disease to first-line EGFR-TKIs treatment, and the total positive rate of T790M was 51.7%. 151 patients who harbored T790M received osimertinib as subsequent treatment. Among them, the median progression-free survival (PFS) of first-line EGFR-TKI (PFS1) was 14.0 months, and the median PFS of osimertinib (PFS2) was 10.1 months. The median PFS1 + PFS2 was 27.5 months, and the median overall survival from first-line EGFR-TKI was 61.3 months. Concerning different first-line EGFR-TKIs, the median PFS2 was 10.9 months in the gefitinib group, 10.0 months in the erlotinib group, and 6.7 months in the afatinib group (p = 0.534). The median PFS1 + PFS2 was 27.7 months, 26.8 months and 24.0 months in the gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib group, respectively (p = 0.575). In conclusion, both first-generation and second-generation EGFR-TKIs sequential osimertinib treatment provided good clinical efficacy in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with acquired T790M mutation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8187359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81873592021-06-09 The impact of different first-line EGFR-TKIs on the clinical outcome of sequential osimertinib treatment in advanced NSCLC with secondary T790M Huang, Yen-Hsiang Tseng, Jeng-Sen Hsu, Kuo-Hsuan Chen, Kun-Chieh Su, Kang-Yi Yu, Sung-Liang Chen, Jeremy J. W. Yang, Tsung-Ying Chang, Gee-Chen Sci Rep Article The impact of different first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)s to the clinical efficacy of osimertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with acquired T790M was still unclear. We enrolled 733 advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib as first-line EGFR-TKIs treatment for analysis. 373 patients received re-biopsies after progressive disease to first-line EGFR-TKIs treatment, and the total positive rate of T790M was 51.7%. 151 patients who harbored T790M received osimertinib as subsequent treatment. Among them, the median progression-free survival (PFS) of first-line EGFR-TKI (PFS1) was 14.0 months, and the median PFS of osimertinib (PFS2) was 10.1 months. The median PFS1 + PFS2 was 27.5 months, and the median overall survival from first-line EGFR-TKI was 61.3 months. Concerning different first-line EGFR-TKIs, the median PFS2 was 10.9 months in the gefitinib group, 10.0 months in the erlotinib group, and 6.7 months in the afatinib group (p = 0.534). The median PFS1 + PFS2 was 27.7 months, 26.8 months and 24.0 months in the gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib group, respectively (p = 0.575). In conclusion, both first-generation and second-generation EGFR-TKIs sequential osimertinib treatment provided good clinical efficacy in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with acquired T790M mutation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8187359/ /pubmed/34103652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91657-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Huang, Yen-Hsiang Tseng, Jeng-Sen Hsu, Kuo-Hsuan Chen, Kun-Chieh Su, Kang-Yi Yu, Sung-Liang Chen, Jeremy J. W. Yang, Tsung-Ying Chang, Gee-Chen The impact of different first-line EGFR-TKIs on the clinical outcome of sequential osimertinib treatment in advanced NSCLC with secondary T790M |
title | The impact of different first-line EGFR-TKIs on the clinical outcome of sequential osimertinib treatment in advanced NSCLC with secondary T790M |
title_full | The impact of different first-line EGFR-TKIs on the clinical outcome of sequential osimertinib treatment in advanced NSCLC with secondary T790M |
title_fullStr | The impact of different first-line EGFR-TKIs on the clinical outcome of sequential osimertinib treatment in advanced NSCLC with secondary T790M |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of different first-line EGFR-TKIs on the clinical outcome of sequential osimertinib treatment in advanced NSCLC with secondary T790M |
title_short | The impact of different first-line EGFR-TKIs on the clinical outcome of sequential osimertinib treatment in advanced NSCLC with secondary T790M |
title_sort | impact of different first-line egfr-tkis on the clinical outcome of sequential osimertinib treatment in advanced nsclc with secondary t790m |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8187359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91657-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangyenhsiang theimpactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT tsengjengsen theimpactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT hsukuohsuan theimpactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT chenkunchieh theimpactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT sukangyi theimpactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT yusungliang theimpactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT chenjeremyjw theimpactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT yangtsungying theimpactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT changgeechen theimpactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT huangyenhsiang impactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT tsengjengsen impactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT hsukuohsuan impactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT chenkunchieh impactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT sukangyi impactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT yusungliang impactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT chenjeremyjw impactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT yangtsungying impactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m AT changgeechen impactofdifferentfirstlineegfrtkisontheclinicaloutcomeofsequentialosimertinibtreatmentinadvancednsclcwithsecondaryt790m |