Cargando…
Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs
The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) have appeared promising as replacements for antibiotics in in vitro studies. Microencapsulation, especially by the spray-drying method, has been used to preserve their numbers and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8187408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91427-5 |
_version_ | 1783705124207591424 |
---|---|
author | Pupa, Pawiya Apiwatsiri, Prasert Sirichokchatchawan, Wandee Pirarat, Nopadon Maison, Tanawong Koontanatechanon, Anantawat Prapasarakul, Nuvee |
author_facet | Pupa, Pawiya Apiwatsiri, Prasert Sirichokchatchawan, Wandee Pirarat, Nopadon Maison, Tanawong Koontanatechanon, Anantawat Prapasarakul, Nuvee |
author_sort | Pupa, Pawiya |
collection | PubMed |
description | The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) have appeared promising as replacements for antibiotics in in vitro studies. Microencapsulation, especially by the spray-drying method, has been used to preserve their numbers and characteristics during storage and digestion. This study compared the efficacy of these strains and their microencapsulated form with antibiotic usage on growth performance, faecal microbial counts, and intestinal morphology in nursing-finishing pigs. A total of 240 healthy neonatal pigs were treated on days 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 after cross-fostering. Sterile peptone water was delivered orally to the control and antibiotic groups. Spray-dried Lactobacillus plantarum strain 22F stored for 6-months was administered to piglets in the spraydry group. Three ml of each the three fresh strains (10(9) CFU/mL) were orally administered to piglets in each group. All pigs received the basal diets, but these were supplemented with routine antibiotic for the antibiotic group. Pigs in all the probiotic supplemented groups exhibited a better average daily gain and feed conversion ratio than those of the controls in the nursery and grower phases. Probiotic supplementation increased viable lactobacilli and decreased enterobacterial counts. Antibiotic additives reduced both enterobacterial and lactobacilli counts. Villous height and villous height:crypt depth ratio were greater in probiotic and antibiotic supplemented pigs comparing to the controls, especially in the jejunum. The results demonstrated the feasibility of using these strains as a substitute for antibiotics and the practicality of the microencapsulation protocol for use in swine farms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8187408 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81874082021-06-09 Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs Pupa, Pawiya Apiwatsiri, Prasert Sirichokchatchawan, Wandee Pirarat, Nopadon Maison, Tanawong Koontanatechanon, Anantawat Prapasarakul, Nuvee Sci Rep Article The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) have appeared promising as replacements for antibiotics in in vitro studies. Microencapsulation, especially by the spray-drying method, has been used to preserve their numbers and characteristics during storage and digestion. This study compared the efficacy of these strains and their microencapsulated form with antibiotic usage on growth performance, faecal microbial counts, and intestinal morphology in nursing-finishing pigs. A total of 240 healthy neonatal pigs were treated on days 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 after cross-fostering. Sterile peptone water was delivered orally to the control and antibiotic groups. Spray-dried Lactobacillus plantarum strain 22F stored for 6-months was administered to piglets in the spraydry group. Three ml of each the three fresh strains (10(9) CFU/mL) were orally administered to piglets in each group. All pigs received the basal diets, but these were supplemented with routine antibiotic for the antibiotic group. Pigs in all the probiotic supplemented groups exhibited a better average daily gain and feed conversion ratio than those of the controls in the nursery and grower phases. Probiotic supplementation increased viable lactobacilli and decreased enterobacterial counts. Antibiotic additives reduced both enterobacterial and lactobacilli counts. Villous height and villous height:crypt depth ratio were greater in probiotic and antibiotic supplemented pigs comparing to the controls, especially in the jejunum. The results demonstrated the feasibility of using these strains as a substitute for antibiotics and the practicality of the microencapsulation protocol for use in swine farms. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8187408/ /pubmed/34103574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91427-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Pupa, Pawiya Apiwatsiri, Prasert Sirichokchatchawan, Wandee Pirarat, Nopadon Maison, Tanawong Koontanatechanon, Anantawat Prapasarakul, Nuvee Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs |
title | Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs |
title_full | Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs |
title_fullStr | Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs |
title_short | Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs |
title_sort | use of lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22f and 25f) and pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72n) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8187408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91427-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pupapawiya useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs AT apiwatsiriprasert useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs AT sirichokchatchawanwandee useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs AT piraratnopadon useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs AT maisontanawong useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs AT koontanatechanonanantawat useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs AT prapasarakulnuvee useoflactobacillusplantarumstrains22fand25fandpediococcusacidilacticistrain72nasreplacementsforantibioticgrowthpromotantsinpigs |