Cargando…
Randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot Study of Neurocardiac Function in Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Undergoing Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback
Background: Neurocardiac dysfunction worsens clinical outcome and increases mortality in stroke survivors. We hypothesized that heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback improves neurocardiac function by modulating autonomic nervous system activity after acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Methods: We rand...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8187903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122314 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.669843 |
_version_ | 1783705231220015104 |
---|---|
author | Siepmann, Timo Ohle, Paulin Sedghi, Annahita Simon, Erik Arndt, Martin Pallesen, Lars-Peder Ritschel, Gerhard Barlinn, Jessica Reichmann, Heinz Puetz, Volker Barlinn, Kristian |
author_facet | Siepmann, Timo Ohle, Paulin Sedghi, Annahita Simon, Erik Arndt, Martin Pallesen, Lars-Peder Ritschel, Gerhard Barlinn, Jessica Reichmann, Heinz Puetz, Volker Barlinn, Kristian |
author_sort | Siepmann, Timo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Neurocardiac dysfunction worsens clinical outcome and increases mortality in stroke survivors. We hypothesized that heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback improves neurocardiac function by modulating autonomic nervous system activity after acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Methods: We randomly allocated (1:1) 48 acute ischaemic stroke patients to receive nine sessions of HRV- or sham biofeedback over 3 days in addition to comprehensive stroke unit care. Before and after the intervention patients were evaluated for HRV via standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN, primary outcome), root mean square of successive differences between normal heartbeats (RMSSD), a predominantly parasympathetic measure, and for sympathetic vasomotor and sudomotor function. Severity of autonomic symptoms was assessed via survey of autonomic symptom scale total impact score (TIS) at baseline and after 3 months. Results: We included 48 patients with acute ischaemic stroke [19 females, ages 65 (4.4), median (interquartile range)]. Treatment with HRV biofeedback increased HRV post intervention [SDNN: 43.5 (79.0) ms vs. 34.1 (45.0) ms baseline, p = 0.015; RMSSD: 46.0 (140.6) ms vs. 29.1 (52.2) ms baseline, p = 0.015] and alleviated autonomic symptoms after 3 months [TIS 3.5 (8.0) vs. 7.5 (7.0) baseline, p = 0.029], which was not seen after sham biofeedback (SDNN: p = 0.63, RMSSD: p = 0.65, TIS: 0.06). There were no changes in sympathetic vasomotor and sudomotor function (p = ns). Conclusions: Adding HRV biofeedback to standard stroke unit care led to improved neurocardiac function and sustained alleviation of autonomic symptoms after acute ischaemic stroke, which was likely mediated by a predominantly parasympathetic mechanism. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03865225. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8187903 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81879032021-06-10 Randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot Study of Neurocardiac Function in Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Undergoing Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Siepmann, Timo Ohle, Paulin Sedghi, Annahita Simon, Erik Arndt, Martin Pallesen, Lars-Peder Ritschel, Gerhard Barlinn, Jessica Reichmann, Heinz Puetz, Volker Barlinn, Kristian Front Neurol Neurology Background: Neurocardiac dysfunction worsens clinical outcome and increases mortality in stroke survivors. We hypothesized that heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback improves neurocardiac function by modulating autonomic nervous system activity after acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Methods: We randomly allocated (1:1) 48 acute ischaemic stroke patients to receive nine sessions of HRV- or sham biofeedback over 3 days in addition to comprehensive stroke unit care. Before and after the intervention patients were evaluated for HRV via standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN, primary outcome), root mean square of successive differences between normal heartbeats (RMSSD), a predominantly parasympathetic measure, and for sympathetic vasomotor and sudomotor function. Severity of autonomic symptoms was assessed via survey of autonomic symptom scale total impact score (TIS) at baseline and after 3 months. Results: We included 48 patients with acute ischaemic stroke [19 females, ages 65 (4.4), median (interquartile range)]. Treatment with HRV biofeedback increased HRV post intervention [SDNN: 43.5 (79.0) ms vs. 34.1 (45.0) ms baseline, p = 0.015; RMSSD: 46.0 (140.6) ms vs. 29.1 (52.2) ms baseline, p = 0.015] and alleviated autonomic symptoms after 3 months [TIS 3.5 (8.0) vs. 7.5 (7.0) baseline, p = 0.029], which was not seen after sham biofeedback (SDNN: p = 0.63, RMSSD: p = 0.65, TIS: 0.06). There were no changes in sympathetic vasomotor and sudomotor function (p = ns). Conclusions: Adding HRV biofeedback to standard stroke unit care led to improved neurocardiac function and sustained alleviation of autonomic symptoms after acute ischaemic stroke, which was likely mediated by a predominantly parasympathetic mechanism. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03865225. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8187903/ /pubmed/34122314 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.669843 Text en Copyright © 2021 Siepmann, Ohle, Sedghi, Simon, Arndt, Pallesen, Ritschel, Barlinn, Reichmann, Puetz and Barlinn. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Siepmann, Timo Ohle, Paulin Sedghi, Annahita Simon, Erik Arndt, Martin Pallesen, Lars-Peder Ritschel, Gerhard Barlinn, Jessica Reichmann, Heinz Puetz, Volker Barlinn, Kristian Randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot Study of Neurocardiac Function in Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Undergoing Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback |
title | Randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot Study of Neurocardiac Function in Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Undergoing Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback |
title_full | Randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot Study of Neurocardiac Function in Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Undergoing Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback |
title_fullStr | Randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot Study of Neurocardiac Function in Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Undergoing Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot Study of Neurocardiac Function in Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Undergoing Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback |
title_short | Randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot Study of Neurocardiac Function in Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Undergoing Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback |
title_sort | randomized sham-controlled pilot study of neurocardiac function in patients with acute ischaemic stroke undergoing heart rate variability biofeedback |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8187903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122314 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.669843 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siepmanntimo randomizedshamcontrolledpilotstudyofneurocardiacfunctioninpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeundergoingheartratevariabilitybiofeedback AT ohlepaulin randomizedshamcontrolledpilotstudyofneurocardiacfunctioninpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeundergoingheartratevariabilitybiofeedback AT sedghiannahita randomizedshamcontrolledpilotstudyofneurocardiacfunctioninpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeundergoingheartratevariabilitybiofeedback AT simonerik randomizedshamcontrolledpilotstudyofneurocardiacfunctioninpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeundergoingheartratevariabilitybiofeedback AT arndtmartin randomizedshamcontrolledpilotstudyofneurocardiacfunctioninpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeundergoingheartratevariabilitybiofeedback AT pallesenlarspeder randomizedshamcontrolledpilotstudyofneurocardiacfunctioninpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeundergoingheartratevariabilitybiofeedback AT ritschelgerhard randomizedshamcontrolledpilotstudyofneurocardiacfunctioninpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeundergoingheartratevariabilitybiofeedback AT barlinnjessica randomizedshamcontrolledpilotstudyofneurocardiacfunctioninpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeundergoingheartratevariabilitybiofeedback AT reichmannheinz randomizedshamcontrolledpilotstudyofneurocardiacfunctioninpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeundergoingheartratevariabilitybiofeedback AT puetzvolker randomizedshamcontrolledpilotstudyofneurocardiacfunctioninpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeundergoingheartratevariabilitybiofeedback AT barlinnkristian randomizedshamcontrolledpilotstudyofneurocardiacfunctioninpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeundergoingheartratevariabilitybiofeedback |