Cargando…

Systematic review, meta-analysis and statistical analysis of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. endometrial ablation

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effect of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) with endometrial ablation (EA) in terms of general and menstrual-related quality of life in women opting for surgical treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sources sear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marchand, Greg J., Azadi, Ali, Sainz, Katelyn, Masoud, Ahmed, Anderson, Sienna, Ruther, Stacy, Ware, Kelly, Hopewell, Sophia, Brazil, Giovanna, King, Alexa, Vallejo, Jannelle, Cieminski, Kaitlynne, Galitsky, Anthony, Steele, Allison, Love, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8187984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663195
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2021.2020.0185
_version_ 1783705249871036416
author Marchand, Greg J.
Azadi, Ali
Sainz, Katelyn
Masoud, Ahmed
Anderson, Sienna
Ruther, Stacy
Ware, Kelly
Hopewell, Sophia
Brazil, Giovanna
King, Alexa
Vallejo, Jannelle
Cieminski, Kaitlynne
Galitsky, Anthony
Steele, Allison
Love, Jennifer
author_facet Marchand, Greg J.
Azadi, Ali
Sainz, Katelyn
Masoud, Ahmed
Anderson, Sienna
Ruther, Stacy
Ware, Kelly
Hopewell, Sophia
Brazil, Giovanna
King, Alexa
Vallejo, Jannelle
Cieminski, Kaitlynne
Galitsky, Anthony
Steele, Allison
Love, Jennifer
author_sort Marchand, Greg J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effect of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) with endometrial ablation (EA) in terms of general and menstrual-related quality of life in women opting for surgical treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sources searched included PubMed, Cochrane library, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant clinical trials. Main outcomes of interest included: quality of life assessed using medical outcomes survey short form-36 (SF-36), (SF-12), operation time, time from operation to discharge, pain, fever, and hemoglobin level. Screening and data extraction were performed independently and the analysis was conducted using Review Manager Software v5.4.1. RESULTS: Four clinical trials were included. Results of SF-12 score showed that there was no significant difference between the LSH and EA groups for either mental or physical component score overall mean difference (MD): -4.15 (-16.01, 7.71; p=0.49) and MD: 2.67 (-0.37, 5.71; p=0.08), respectively. Subgroup analysis of the SF-36 showed that only two components, general health and social function, were significantly improved in the LSH group (p<0.01) while the other six sub-scores did not differ between groups. The overall MD significantly favored the EA group for: operation time [MD: 72.65 (35.48, 109.82; p=0.0001)], time from operation to discharge [MD: 13.61 (3.21, 24.01; p=0.01)], hemoglobin level outcome [MD: 0.57 (0.40, 0.74); p<0.01], and pain score [standardized MD: 0.46 (0.32, 0.60; p<0.01)]. CONCLUSION: LSH has better outcomes for quality of life. This includes patient indicated responses to social health, general health, and superior hemoglobin levels at all measured points postoperatively. EA, however, was consistently associated with less operative time, a shorter hospital stay and is also considered by the authors to be a more minimally invasive technique which can also result in satisfying outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8187984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81879842021-06-22 Systematic review, meta-analysis and statistical analysis of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. endometrial ablation Marchand, Greg J. Azadi, Ali Sainz, Katelyn Masoud, Ahmed Anderson, Sienna Ruther, Stacy Ware, Kelly Hopewell, Sophia Brazil, Giovanna King, Alexa Vallejo, Jannelle Cieminski, Kaitlynne Galitsky, Anthony Steele, Allison Love, Jennifer J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effect of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) with endometrial ablation (EA) in terms of general and menstrual-related quality of life in women opting for surgical treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sources searched included PubMed, Cochrane library, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant clinical trials. Main outcomes of interest included: quality of life assessed using medical outcomes survey short form-36 (SF-36), (SF-12), operation time, time from operation to discharge, pain, fever, and hemoglobin level. Screening and data extraction were performed independently and the analysis was conducted using Review Manager Software v5.4.1. RESULTS: Four clinical trials were included. Results of SF-12 score showed that there was no significant difference between the LSH and EA groups for either mental or physical component score overall mean difference (MD): -4.15 (-16.01, 7.71; p=0.49) and MD: 2.67 (-0.37, 5.71; p=0.08), respectively. Subgroup analysis of the SF-36 showed that only two components, general health and social function, were significantly improved in the LSH group (p<0.01) while the other six sub-scores did not differ between groups. The overall MD significantly favored the EA group for: operation time [MD: 72.65 (35.48, 109.82; p=0.0001)], time from operation to discharge [MD: 13.61 (3.21, 24.01; p=0.01)], hemoglobin level outcome [MD: 0.57 (0.40, 0.74); p<0.01], and pain score [standardized MD: 0.46 (0.32, 0.60; p<0.01)]. CONCLUSION: LSH has better outcomes for quality of life. This includes patient indicated responses to social health, general health, and superior hemoglobin levels at all measured points postoperatively. EA, however, was consistently associated with less operative time, a shorter hospital stay and is also considered by the authors to be a more minimally invasive technique which can also result in satisfying outcomes. Galenos Publishing 2021-06 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8187984/ /pubmed/33663195 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2021.2020.0185 Text en © Copyright 2021 by the Turkish-German Gynecological Education and Research Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association published by Galenos Publishing House.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Marchand, Greg J.
Azadi, Ali
Sainz, Katelyn
Masoud, Ahmed
Anderson, Sienna
Ruther, Stacy
Ware, Kelly
Hopewell, Sophia
Brazil, Giovanna
King, Alexa
Vallejo, Jannelle
Cieminski, Kaitlynne
Galitsky, Anthony
Steele, Allison
Love, Jennifer
Systematic review, meta-analysis and statistical analysis of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. endometrial ablation
title Systematic review, meta-analysis and statistical analysis of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. endometrial ablation
title_full Systematic review, meta-analysis and statistical analysis of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. endometrial ablation
title_fullStr Systematic review, meta-analysis and statistical analysis of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. endometrial ablation
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review, meta-analysis and statistical analysis of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. endometrial ablation
title_short Systematic review, meta-analysis and statistical analysis of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. endometrial ablation
title_sort systematic review, meta-analysis and statistical analysis of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. endometrial ablation
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8187984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663195
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2021.2020.0185
work_keys_str_mv AT marchandgregj systematicreviewmetaanalysisandstatisticalanalysisoflaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomyvsendometrialablation
AT azadiali systematicreviewmetaanalysisandstatisticalanalysisoflaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomyvsendometrialablation
AT sainzkatelyn systematicreviewmetaanalysisandstatisticalanalysisoflaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomyvsendometrialablation
AT masoudahmed systematicreviewmetaanalysisandstatisticalanalysisoflaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomyvsendometrialablation
AT andersonsienna systematicreviewmetaanalysisandstatisticalanalysisoflaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomyvsendometrialablation
AT rutherstacy systematicreviewmetaanalysisandstatisticalanalysisoflaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomyvsendometrialablation
AT warekelly systematicreviewmetaanalysisandstatisticalanalysisoflaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomyvsendometrialablation
AT hopewellsophia systematicreviewmetaanalysisandstatisticalanalysisoflaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomyvsendometrialablation
AT brazilgiovanna systematicreviewmetaanalysisandstatisticalanalysisoflaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomyvsendometrialablation
AT kingalexa systematicreviewmetaanalysisandstatisticalanalysisoflaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomyvsendometrialablation
AT vallejojannelle systematicreviewmetaanalysisandstatisticalanalysisoflaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomyvsendometrialablation
AT cieminskikaitlynne systematicreviewmetaanalysisandstatisticalanalysisoflaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomyvsendometrialablation
AT galitskyanthony systematicreviewmetaanalysisandstatisticalanalysisoflaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomyvsendometrialablation
AT steeleallison systematicreviewmetaanalysisandstatisticalanalysisoflaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomyvsendometrialablation
AT lovejennifer systematicreviewmetaanalysisandstatisticalanalysisoflaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomyvsendometrialablation