Cargando…

Data processing workflow for large-scale immune monitoring studies by mass cytometry

Mass cytometry is a powerful tool for deep immune monitoring studies. To ensure maximal data quality, a careful experimental and analytical design is required. However even in well-controlled experiments variability caused by either operator or instrument can introduce artifacts that need to be corr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rybakowska, Paulina, Van Gassen, Sofie, Quintelier, Katrien, Saeys, Yvan, Alarcón-Riquelme, Marta E., Marañón, Concepción
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8188119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.05.032
_version_ 1783705279770132480
author Rybakowska, Paulina
Van Gassen, Sofie
Quintelier, Katrien
Saeys, Yvan
Alarcón-Riquelme, Marta E.
Marañón, Concepción
author_facet Rybakowska, Paulina
Van Gassen, Sofie
Quintelier, Katrien
Saeys, Yvan
Alarcón-Riquelme, Marta E.
Marañón, Concepción
author_sort Rybakowska, Paulina
collection PubMed
description Mass cytometry is a powerful tool for deep immune monitoring studies. To ensure maximal data quality, a careful experimental and analytical design is required. However even in well-controlled experiments variability caused by either operator or instrument can introduce artifacts that need to be corrected or removed from the data. Here we present a data processing pipeline which ensures the minimization of experimental artifacts and batch effects, while improving data quality. Data preprocessing and quality controls are carried out using an R pipeline and packages like CATALYST for bead-normalization and debarcoding, flowAI and flowCut for signal anomaly cleaning, AOF for files quality control, flowClean and flowDensity for gating, CytoNorm for batch normalization and FlowSOM and UMAP for data exploration. As proper experimental design is key in obtaining good quality events, we also include the sample processing protocol used to generate the data. Both, analysis and experimental pipelines are easy to scale-up, thus the workflow presented here is particularly suitable for large-scale, multicenter, multibatch and retrospective studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8188119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81881192021-06-16 Data processing workflow for large-scale immune monitoring studies by mass cytometry Rybakowska, Paulina Van Gassen, Sofie Quintelier, Katrien Saeys, Yvan Alarcón-Riquelme, Marta E. Marañón, Concepción Comput Struct Biotechnol J Method Article Mass cytometry is a powerful tool for deep immune monitoring studies. To ensure maximal data quality, a careful experimental and analytical design is required. However even in well-controlled experiments variability caused by either operator or instrument can introduce artifacts that need to be corrected or removed from the data. Here we present a data processing pipeline which ensures the minimization of experimental artifacts and batch effects, while improving data quality. Data preprocessing and quality controls are carried out using an R pipeline and packages like CATALYST for bead-normalization and debarcoding, flowAI and flowCut for signal anomaly cleaning, AOF for files quality control, flowClean and flowDensity for gating, CytoNorm for batch normalization and FlowSOM and UMAP for data exploration. As proper experimental design is key in obtaining good quality events, we also include the sample processing protocol used to generate the data. Both, analysis and experimental pipelines are easy to scale-up, thus the workflow presented here is particularly suitable for large-scale, multicenter, multibatch and retrospective studies. Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8188119/ /pubmed/34141137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.05.032 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Method Article
Rybakowska, Paulina
Van Gassen, Sofie
Quintelier, Katrien
Saeys, Yvan
Alarcón-Riquelme, Marta E.
Marañón, Concepción
Data processing workflow for large-scale immune monitoring studies by mass cytometry
title Data processing workflow for large-scale immune monitoring studies by mass cytometry
title_full Data processing workflow for large-scale immune monitoring studies by mass cytometry
title_fullStr Data processing workflow for large-scale immune monitoring studies by mass cytometry
title_full_unstemmed Data processing workflow for large-scale immune monitoring studies by mass cytometry
title_short Data processing workflow for large-scale immune monitoring studies by mass cytometry
title_sort data processing workflow for large-scale immune monitoring studies by mass cytometry
topic Method Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8188119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.05.032
work_keys_str_mv AT rybakowskapaulina dataprocessingworkflowforlargescaleimmunemonitoringstudiesbymasscytometry
AT vangassensofie dataprocessingworkflowforlargescaleimmunemonitoringstudiesbymasscytometry
AT quintelierkatrien dataprocessingworkflowforlargescaleimmunemonitoringstudiesbymasscytometry
AT saeysyvan dataprocessingworkflowforlargescaleimmunemonitoringstudiesbymasscytometry
AT alarconriquelmemartae dataprocessingworkflowforlargescaleimmunemonitoringstudiesbymasscytometry
AT maranonconcepcion dataprocessingworkflowforlargescaleimmunemonitoringstudiesbymasscytometry