Cargando…

A Machine Learning Approach to the Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Tests: Development and Validation

OBJECTIVE: At present, there is no consensus on the best strategy for interpreting the cardiopulmonary exercise test's (CPET) results. This study is aimed at assessing the potential of using computer-aided algorithms to evaluate CPET data for identifying chronic heart failure (CHF) and chronic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inbar, Or, Inbar, Omri, Reuveny, Ronen, Segel, Michael J., Greenspan, Hayit, Scheinowitz, Mickey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8188599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34158976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5516248
_version_ 1783705361020092416
author Inbar, Or
Inbar, Omri
Reuveny, Ronen
Segel, Michael J.
Greenspan, Hayit
Scheinowitz, Mickey
author_facet Inbar, Or
Inbar, Omri
Reuveny, Ronen
Segel, Michael J.
Greenspan, Hayit
Scheinowitz, Mickey
author_sort Inbar, Or
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: At present, there is no consensus on the best strategy for interpreting the cardiopulmonary exercise test's (CPET) results. This study is aimed at assessing the potential of using computer-aided algorithms to evaluate CPET data for identifying chronic heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: Data from 234 CPET files from the Pulmonary Institute, at Sheba Medical Center, and the Givat-Washington College, both in Israel, were selected for this study. The selected CPET files included patients with confirmed primary CHF (n = 73), COPD (n = 75), and healthy subjects (n = 86). Of the 234 CPETs, 150 (50 in each group) tests were used for the support vector machine (SVM) learning stage, and the remaining 84 tests were used for the model validation. The performance of the SVM interpretive module was assessed by comparing its interpretation output with the conventional clinical diagnosis using distribution analysis. RESULTS: The disease classification results show that the overall predictive power of the proposed interpretive model ranged from 96% to 100%, indicating very high predictive power. Furthermore, the sensitivity, specificity, and overall precision of the proposed interpretive module were 99%, 99%, and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed new computer-aided CPET interpretive module was found to be highly sensitive and specific in classifying patients with CHF or COPD, or healthy. Comparable modules may well be applied to additional and larger populations (pathologies and exercise limitations), thereby making this tool powerful and clinically applicable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8188599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81885992021-06-21 A Machine Learning Approach to the Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Tests: Development and Validation Inbar, Or Inbar, Omri Reuveny, Ronen Segel, Michael J. Greenspan, Hayit Scheinowitz, Mickey Pulm Med Research Article OBJECTIVE: At present, there is no consensus on the best strategy for interpreting the cardiopulmonary exercise test's (CPET) results. This study is aimed at assessing the potential of using computer-aided algorithms to evaluate CPET data for identifying chronic heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: Data from 234 CPET files from the Pulmonary Institute, at Sheba Medical Center, and the Givat-Washington College, both in Israel, were selected for this study. The selected CPET files included patients with confirmed primary CHF (n = 73), COPD (n = 75), and healthy subjects (n = 86). Of the 234 CPETs, 150 (50 in each group) tests were used for the support vector machine (SVM) learning stage, and the remaining 84 tests were used for the model validation. The performance of the SVM interpretive module was assessed by comparing its interpretation output with the conventional clinical diagnosis using distribution analysis. RESULTS: The disease classification results show that the overall predictive power of the proposed interpretive model ranged from 96% to 100%, indicating very high predictive power. Furthermore, the sensitivity, specificity, and overall precision of the proposed interpretive module were 99%, 99%, and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed new computer-aided CPET interpretive module was found to be highly sensitive and specific in classifying patients with CHF or COPD, or healthy. Comparable modules may well be applied to additional and larger populations (pathologies and exercise limitations), thereby making this tool powerful and clinically applicable. Hindawi 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8188599/ /pubmed/34158976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5516248 Text en Copyright © 2021 Or Inbar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Inbar, Or
Inbar, Omri
Reuveny, Ronen
Segel, Michael J.
Greenspan, Hayit
Scheinowitz, Mickey
A Machine Learning Approach to the Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Tests: Development and Validation
title A Machine Learning Approach to the Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Tests: Development and Validation
title_full A Machine Learning Approach to the Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Tests: Development and Validation
title_fullStr A Machine Learning Approach to the Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Tests: Development and Validation
title_full_unstemmed A Machine Learning Approach to the Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Tests: Development and Validation
title_short A Machine Learning Approach to the Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Tests: Development and Validation
title_sort machine learning approach to the interpretation of cardiopulmonary exercise tests: development and validation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8188599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34158976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5516248
work_keys_str_mv AT inbaror amachinelearningapproachtotheinterpretationofcardiopulmonaryexercisetestsdevelopmentandvalidation
AT inbaromri amachinelearningapproachtotheinterpretationofcardiopulmonaryexercisetestsdevelopmentandvalidation
AT reuvenyronen amachinelearningapproachtotheinterpretationofcardiopulmonaryexercisetestsdevelopmentandvalidation
AT segelmichaelj amachinelearningapproachtotheinterpretationofcardiopulmonaryexercisetestsdevelopmentandvalidation
AT greenspanhayit amachinelearningapproachtotheinterpretationofcardiopulmonaryexercisetestsdevelopmentandvalidation
AT scheinowitzmickey amachinelearningapproachtotheinterpretationofcardiopulmonaryexercisetestsdevelopmentandvalidation
AT inbaror machinelearningapproachtotheinterpretationofcardiopulmonaryexercisetestsdevelopmentandvalidation
AT inbaromri machinelearningapproachtotheinterpretationofcardiopulmonaryexercisetestsdevelopmentandvalidation
AT reuvenyronen machinelearningapproachtotheinterpretationofcardiopulmonaryexercisetestsdevelopmentandvalidation
AT segelmichaelj machinelearningapproachtotheinterpretationofcardiopulmonaryexercisetestsdevelopmentandvalidation
AT greenspanhayit machinelearningapproachtotheinterpretationofcardiopulmonaryexercisetestsdevelopmentandvalidation
AT scheinowitzmickey machinelearningapproachtotheinterpretationofcardiopulmonaryexercisetestsdevelopmentandvalidation