Cargando…

Panoramic prediction equations to estimate implant- to-mandibular canal dimensions in the mandibular posterior region: implications for dental implant treatment

BACKGROUND: To develop and cross-validate site-specific panoramic radiography (PAN) analysis prediction equations of implant-to-mandibular canal dimensions (IMCD) in mandibular regions posterior to the mental foramen, and to help determine in which instances CBCT technology will be a justified adjun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertram, Annika, Eckert, Alexander W., Kolk, Andreas, Emshoff, Rüdiger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8188713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34107989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-021-00270-6
_version_ 1783705381052088320
author Bertram, Annika
Eckert, Alexander W.
Kolk, Andreas
Emshoff, Rüdiger
author_facet Bertram, Annika
Eckert, Alexander W.
Kolk, Andreas
Emshoff, Rüdiger
author_sort Bertram, Annika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To develop and cross-validate site-specific panoramic radiography (PAN) analysis prediction equations of implant-to-mandibular canal dimensions (IMCD) in mandibular regions posterior to the mental foramen, and to help determine in which instances CBCT technology will be a justified adjunct in clinical practice. METHODS: IMCD by PAN (Pan-D) from implant site-specific regions (first premolar, second premolar, first molar, and second molar sites) were collected from 40- to 70-year-old adolescents. They were randomly assigned to validation (n = 144) and cross-validation (n = 148) groups. The cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) technique was used as the criterion method for the estimation of IMCD (CBCT-D). The PAN analysis equations were developed using stepwise multiple regression analysis and cross-validated using the Bland–Altman approach. RESULTS: There was a significant relationship between PAN-D and CBCT-D for both validation (R(2) = 57.8 %; p < .001) and cross-validation groups (R(2) = 52.5 %; p < .001). Root means-squared error (RMSE) and pure error (PE) were highest for the first molar (RMSE = 1.116 mm, PE = 1.01 mm) and the second molar region (RMSE = 1.162 mm, PE = 1.11 mm). CONCLUSIONS: PAN-D has the potential to be developed as an indirect measure of IMCD. However, the findings suggest to exclude scoring of the first and second molars when assessing IMCD via PAN. Use of CBCT may be justified for all IMCD estimations in the first and second molars regions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Martin-Luther University, Halle, Germany (2020-034).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8188713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81887132021-06-10 Panoramic prediction equations to estimate implant- to-mandibular canal dimensions in the mandibular posterior region: implications for dental implant treatment Bertram, Annika Eckert, Alexander W. Kolk, Andreas Emshoff, Rüdiger Head Face Med Research BACKGROUND: To develop and cross-validate site-specific panoramic radiography (PAN) analysis prediction equations of implant-to-mandibular canal dimensions (IMCD) in mandibular regions posterior to the mental foramen, and to help determine in which instances CBCT technology will be a justified adjunct in clinical practice. METHODS: IMCD by PAN (Pan-D) from implant site-specific regions (first premolar, second premolar, first molar, and second molar sites) were collected from 40- to 70-year-old adolescents. They were randomly assigned to validation (n = 144) and cross-validation (n = 148) groups. The cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) technique was used as the criterion method for the estimation of IMCD (CBCT-D). The PAN analysis equations were developed using stepwise multiple regression analysis and cross-validated using the Bland–Altman approach. RESULTS: There was a significant relationship between PAN-D and CBCT-D for both validation (R(2) = 57.8 %; p < .001) and cross-validation groups (R(2) = 52.5 %; p < .001). Root means-squared error (RMSE) and pure error (PE) were highest for the first molar (RMSE = 1.116 mm, PE = 1.01 mm) and the second molar region (RMSE = 1.162 mm, PE = 1.11 mm). CONCLUSIONS: PAN-D has the potential to be developed as an indirect measure of IMCD. However, the findings suggest to exclude scoring of the first and second molars when assessing IMCD via PAN. Use of CBCT may be justified for all IMCD estimations in the first and second molars regions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Martin-Luther University, Halle, Germany (2020-034). BioMed Central 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8188713/ /pubmed/34107989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-021-00270-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bertram, Annika
Eckert, Alexander W.
Kolk, Andreas
Emshoff, Rüdiger
Panoramic prediction equations to estimate implant- to-mandibular canal dimensions in the mandibular posterior region: implications for dental implant treatment
title Panoramic prediction equations to estimate implant- to-mandibular canal dimensions in the mandibular posterior region: implications for dental implant treatment
title_full Panoramic prediction equations to estimate implant- to-mandibular canal dimensions in the mandibular posterior region: implications for dental implant treatment
title_fullStr Panoramic prediction equations to estimate implant- to-mandibular canal dimensions in the mandibular posterior region: implications for dental implant treatment
title_full_unstemmed Panoramic prediction equations to estimate implant- to-mandibular canal dimensions in the mandibular posterior region: implications for dental implant treatment
title_short Panoramic prediction equations to estimate implant- to-mandibular canal dimensions in the mandibular posterior region: implications for dental implant treatment
title_sort panoramic prediction equations to estimate implant- to-mandibular canal dimensions in the mandibular posterior region: implications for dental implant treatment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8188713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34107989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-021-00270-6
work_keys_str_mv AT bertramannika panoramicpredictionequationstoestimateimplanttomandibularcanaldimensionsinthemandibularposteriorregionimplicationsfordentalimplanttreatment
AT eckertalexanderw panoramicpredictionequationstoestimateimplanttomandibularcanaldimensionsinthemandibularposteriorregionimplicationsfordentalimplanttreatment
AT kolkandreas panoramicpredictionequationstoestimateimplanttomandibularcanaldimensionsinthemandibularposteriorregionimplicationsfordentalimplanttreatment
AT emshoffrudiger panoramicpredictionequationstoestimateimplanttomandibularcanaldimensionsinthemandibularposteriorregionimplicationsfordentalimplanttreatment