Cargando…
A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays
INTRODUCTION: Commercially available serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 detect antibodies to either the nucleocapsid or spike protein. Here we compare the performance of the Beckman-Coulter SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG assay to that of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG and Roche Anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleoca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8188801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34118242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.05.011 |
_version_ | 1783705399260610560 |
---|---|
author | Poore, Brad Nerenz, Robert D. Brodis, Dina Brown, Charles I. Cervinski, Mark A. Hubbard, Jacqueline A. |
author_facet | Poore, Brad Nerenz, Robert D. Brodis, Dina Brown, Charles I. Cervinski, Mark A. Hubbard, Jacqueline A. |
author_sort | Poore, Brad |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Commercially available serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 detect antibodies to either the nucleocapsid or spike protein. Here we compare the performance of the Beckman-Coulter SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG assay to that of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG and Roche Anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid total antibody assays. In addition, we document the trend in nucleocapsid and spike antibodies in sequential samples collected from convalescent plasma donors. METHODS: Plasma or serum samples from 20 individual SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive inpatients (n = 172), 20 individual convalescent donors with a previous RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 20), were deemed positive SARS-CoV-2 samples. RT-PCR-negative inpatients (n = 24), and 109 pre-SARS-CoV-2 samples were determined to be SARS-CoV-2 negative. Samples were assayed by the Abbott, Roche, and Beckman assays. RESULTS: All three assays demonstrated 100% specificity. Abbott, Beckman, and Roche platforms had sensitivities of 98%, 93%, and 90% respectively, with the difference in sensitivity attributed primarily to samples from immunocompromised patients. After the exclusion of samples immunocompromised patients, all assays exhibited ≥ 95% sensitivity. In sequential samples collected from the same individuals, the Roche nucleocapsid antibody assay demonstrated continually increasing signal intensity, with maximal values observed at the last time point examined. In contrast, the Beckman spike IgG antibody signal peaked between 14 and 28 days post positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR and steadily declined in subsequent samples. Subsequent collections 51–200 days (median of 139 days) post positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR from five inpatients and five convalescent donors revealed that spike and nucleocapsid antibodies remained detectable for several months after confirmed infection. CONCLUSIONS: The three assays are sensitive and specific for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Nucleocapsid and spike antibodies were detectable for up to 200 days post-positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR but demonstrated markedly different trends in signal intensity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8188801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81888012021-06-10 A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays Poore, Brad Nerenz, Robert D. Brodis, Dina Brown, Charles I. Cervinski, Mark A. Hubbard, Jacqueline A. Clin Biochem Short Communication INTRODUCTION: Commercially available serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 detect antibodies to either the nucleocapsid or spike protein. Here we compare the performance of the Beckman-Coulter SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG assay to that of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG and Roche Anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid total antibody assays. In addition, we document the trend in nucleocapsid and spike antibodies in sequential samples collected from convalescent plasma donors. METHODS: Plasma or serum samples from 20 individual SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive inpatients (n = 172), 20 individual convalescent donors with a previous RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 20), were deemed positive SARS-CoV-2 samples. RT-PCR-negative inpatients (n = 24), and 109 pre-SARS-CoV-2 samples were determined to be SARS-CoV-2 negative. Samples were assayed by the Abbott, Roche, and Beckman assays. RESULTS: All three assays demonstrated 100% specificity. Abbott, Beckman, and Roche platforms had sensitivities of 98%, 93%, and 90% respectively, with the difference in sensitivity attributed primarily to samples from immunocompromised patients. After the exclusion of samples immunocompromised patients, all assays exhibited ≥ 95% sensitivity. In sequential samples collected from the same individuals, the Roche nucleocapsid antibody assay demonstrated continually increasing signal intensity, with maximal values observed at the last time point examined. In contrast, the Beckman spike IgG antibody signal peaked between 14 and 28 days post positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR and steadily declined in subsequent samples. Subsequent collections 51–200 days (median of 139 days) post positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR from five inpatients and five convalescent donors revealed that spike and nucleocapsid antibodies remained detectable for several months after confirmed infection. CONCLUSIONS: The three assays are sensitive and specific for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Nucleocapsid and spike antibodies were detectable for up to 200 days post-positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR but demonstrated markedly different trends in signal intensity. The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021-09 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8188801/ /pubmed/34118242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.05.011 Text en © 2021 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Poore, Brad Nerenz, Robert D. Brodis, Dina Brown, Charles I. Cervinski, Mark A. Hubbard, Jacqueline A. A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays |
title | A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays |
title_full | A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays |
title_fullStr | A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays |
title_short | A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays |
title_sort | comparison of sars-cov-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8188801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34118242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.05.011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poorebrad acomparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays AT nerenzrobertd acomparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays AT brodisdina acomparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays AT browncharlesi acomparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays AT cervinskimarka acomparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays AT hubbardjacquelinea acomparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays AT poorebrad comparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays AT nerenzrobertd comparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays AT brodisdina comparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays AT browncharlesi comparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays AT cervinskimarka comparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays AT hubbardjacquelinea comparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays |