Cargando…

A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays

INTRODUCTION: Commercially available serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 detect antibodies to either the nucleocapsid or spike protein. Here we compare the performance of the Beckman-Coulter SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG assay to that of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG and Roche Anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleoca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poore, Brad, Nerenz, Robert D., Brodis, Dina, Brown, Charles I., Cervinski, Mark A., Hubbard, Jacqueline A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8188801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34118242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.05.011
_version_ 1783705399260610560
author Poore, Brad
Nerenz, Robert D.
Brodis, Dina
Brown, Charles I.
Cervinski, Mark A.
Hubbard, Jacqueline A.
author_facet Poore, Brad
Nerenz, Robert D.
Brodis, Dina
Brown, Charles I.
Cervinski, Mark A.
Hubbard, Jacqueline A.
author_sort Poore, Brad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Commercially available serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 detect antibodies to either the nucleocapsid or spike protein. Here we compare the performance of the Beckman-Coulter SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG assay to that of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG and Roche Anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid total antibody assays. In addition, we document the trend in nucleocapsid and spike antibodies in sequential samples collected from convalescent plasma donors. METHODS: Plasma or serum samples from 20 individual SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive inpatients (n = 172), 20 individual convalescent donors with a previous RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 20), were deemed positive SARS-CoV-2 samples. RT-PCR-negative inpatients (n = 24), and 109 pre-SARS-CoV-2 samples were determined to be SARS-CoV-2 negative. Samples were assayed by the Abbott, Roche, and Beckman assays. RESULTS: All three assays demonstrated 100% specificity. Abbott, Beckman, and Roche platforms had sensitivities of 98%, 93%, and 90% respectively, with the difference in sensitivity attributed primarily to samples from immunocompromised patients. After the exclusion of samples immunocompromised patients, all assays exhibited ≥ 95% sensitivity. In sequential samples collected from the same individuals, the Roche nucleocapsid antibody assay demonstrated continually increasing signal intensity, with maximal values observed at the last time point examined. In contrast, the Beckman spike IgG antibody signal peaked between 14 and 28 days post positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR and steadily declined in subsequent samples. Subsequent collections 51–200 days (median of 139 days) post positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR from five inpatients and five convalescent donors revealed that spike and nucleocapsid antibodies remained detectable for several months after confirmed infection. CONCLUSIONS: The three assays are sensitive and specific for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Nucleocapsid and spike antibodies were detectable for up to 200 days post-positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR but demonstrated markedly different trends in signal intensity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8188801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81888012021-06-10 A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays Poore, Brad Nerenz, Robert D. Brodis, Dina Brown, Charles I. Cervinski, Mark A. Hubbard, Jacqueline A. Clin Biochem Short Communication INTRODUCTION: Commercially available serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 detect antibodies to either the nucleocapsid or spike protein. Here we compare the performance of the Beckman-Coulter SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG assay to that of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG and Roche Anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid total antibody assays. In addition, we document the trend in nucleocapsid and spike antibodies in sequential samples collected from convalescent plasma donors. METHODS: Plasma or serum samples from 20 individual SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive inpatients (n = 172), 20 individual convalescent donors with a previous RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 20), were deemed positive SARS-CoV-2 samples. RT-PCR-negative inpatients (n = 24), and 109 pre-SARS-CoV-2 samples were determined to be SARS-CoV-2 negative. Samples were assayed by the Abbott, Roche, and Beckman assays. RESULTS: All three assays demonstrated 100% specificity. Abbott, Beckman, and Roche platforms had sensitivities of 98%, 93%, and 90% respectively, with the difference in sensitivity attributed primarily to samples from immunocompromised patients. After the exclusion of samples immunocompromised patients, all assays exhibited ≥ 95% sensitivity. In sequential samples collected from the same individuals, the Roche nucleocapsid antibody assay demonstrated continually increasing signal intensity, with maximal values observed at the last time point examined. In contrast, the Beckman spike IgG antibody signal peaked between 14 and 28 days post positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR and steadily declined in subsequent samples. Subsequent collections 51–200 days (median of 139 days) post positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR from five inpatients and five convalescent donors revealed that spike and nucleocapsid antibodies remained detectable for several months after confirmed infection. CONCLUSIONS: The three assays are sensitive and specific for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Nucleocapsid and spike antibodies were detectable for up to 200 days post-positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR but demonstrated markedly different trends in signal intensity. The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021-09 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8188801/ /pubmed/34118242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.05.011 Text en © 2021 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Poore, Brad
Nerenz, Robert D.
Brodis, Dina
Brown, Charles I.
Cervinski, Mark A.
Hubbard, Jacqueline A.
A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays
title A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays
title_full A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays
title_fullStr A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays
title_short A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays
title_sort comparison of sars-cov-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8188801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34118242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.05.011
work_keys_str_mv AT poorebrad acomparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays
AT nerenzrobertd acomparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays
AT brodisdina acomparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays
AT browncharlesi acomparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays
AT cervinskimarka acomparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays
AT hubbardjacquelinea acomparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays
AT poorebrad comparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays
AT nerenzrobertd comparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays
AT brodisdina comparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays
AT browncharlesi comparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays
AT cervinskimarka comparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays
AT hubbardjacquelinea comparisonofsarscov2nucleocapsidandspikeantibodydetectionusingthreecommerciallyavailableautomatedimmunoassays