Cargando…

Difficult Dialogues: Negotiating Faculty Responses to a Gender Bias Literacy Training Program

Diversity training is challenging and can evoke strong emotional responses from participants including resistance, shame, confusion, powerlessness, defensiveness, and anger. These responses create complex situations for both presenters and other learners. We observed 3 experienced presenters as they...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isaac, Carol, Manwell, Linda Baier, Devine, Patricia G., Ford, Cecilia, Sheridan, Jennifer T., Byars-Winston, Angela, Fine, Evelyn, Carnes, Molly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8188829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113929
http://dx.doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2205
Descripción
Sumario:Diversity training is challenging and can evoke strong emotional responses from participants including resistance, shame, confusion, powerlessness, defensiveness, and anger. These responses create complex situations for both presenters and other learners. We observed 3 experienced presenters as they implemented 41 gender bias literacy workshops for 376 faculty from 42 STEMM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics, medicine) departments at one Midwestern university. We recorded questions and answers as well as participants’ non-verbal activity during each 2.5-hour workshop. Employing content analysis and critical incident technique, we identified content that elicited heightened activity and challenging dialogues among presenters and faculty. Results from analysis of this observational data found three important findings: (1) presenters continually reinforced the idea that implicit bias is ordinary and pervasive, thus avoiding participant alienation by allowing participants to protect their self-worth and integrity; (2) difficult dialogues were managed calmly without verbal sparring or relinquishing control; (3) the presenters created an environment where individuals were more likely to accept threatening information.