Cargando…
Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review
BACKGROUND: Molding competent clinicians capable of applying ethics principles in their practice is a challenging task, compounded by wide variations in the teaching and assessment of ethics in the postgraduate setting. Despite these differences, ethics training programs should recognise that the tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8188952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34107935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02644-5 |
_version_ | 1783705425054531584 |
---|---|
author | Hong, Daniel Zhihao Goh, Jia Ling Ong, Zhi Yang Ting, Jacquelin Jia Qi Wong, Mun Kit Wu, Jiaxuan Tan, Xiu Hui Toh, Rachelle Qi En Chiang, Christine Li Ling Ng, Caleb Wei Hao Ng, Jared Chuan Kai Ong, Yun Ting Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen Tay, Kuang Teck Tan, Laura Hui Shuen Phua, Gillian Li Gek Fong, Warren Wijaya, Limin Neo, Shirlyn Hui Shan Lee, Alexia Sze Inn Chiam, Min Chin, Annelissa Mien Chew Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha |
author_facet | Hong, Daniel Zhihao Goh, Jia Ling Ong, Zhi Yang Ting, Jacquelin Jia Qi Wong, Mun Kit Wu, Jiaxuan Tan, Xiu Hui Toh, Rachelle Qi En Chiang, Christine Li Ling Ng, Caleb Wei Hao Ng, Jared Chuan Kai Ong, Yun Ting Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen Tay, Kuang Teck Tan, Laura Hui Shuen Phua, Gillian Li Gek Fong, Warren Wijaya, Limin Neo, Shirlyn Hui Shan Lee, Alexia Sze Inn Chiam, Min Chin, Annelissa Mien Chew Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha |
author_sort | Hong, Daniel Zhihao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Molding competent clinicians capable of applying ethics principles in their practice is a challenging task, compounded by wide variations in the teaching and assessment of ethics in the postgraduate setting. Despite these differences, ethics training programs should recognise that the transition from medical students to healthcare professionals entails a longitudinal process where ethics knowledge, skills and identity continue to build and deepen over time with clinical exposure. A systematic scoping review is proposed to analyse current postgraduate medical ethics training and assessment programs in peer-reviewed literature to guide the development of a local physician training curriculum. METHODS: With a constructivist perspective and relativist lens, this systematic scoping review on postgraduate medical ethics training and assessment will adopt the Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SEBA) to create a transparent and reproducible review. RESULTS: The first search involving the teaching of ethics yielded 7669 abstracts with 573 full text articles evaluated and 66 articles included. The second search involving the assessment of ethics identified 9919 abstracts with 333 full text articles reviewed and 29 articles included. The themes identified from the two searches were the goals and objectives, content, pedagogy, enabling and limiting factors of teaching ethics and assessment modalities used. Despite inherent disparities in ethics training programs, they provide a platform for learners to apply knowledge, translating it to skill and eventually becoming part of the identity of the learner. Illustrating the longitudinal nature of ethics training, the spiral curriculum seamlessly integrates and fortifies prevailing ethical knowledge acquired in medical school with the layering of new specialty, clinical and research specific content in professional practice. Various assessment methods are employed with special mention of portfolios as a longitudinal assessment modality that showcase the impact of ethics training on the development of professional identity formation (PIF). CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic scoping review has elicited key learning points in the teaching and assessment of ethics in the postgraduate setting. However, more research needs to be done on establishing Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA)s in ethics, with further exploration of the use of portfolios and key factors influencing its design, implementation and assessment of PIF and micro-credentialling in ethics practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02644-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8188952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81889522021-06-10 Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review Hong, Daniel Zhihao Goh, Jia Ling Ong, Zhi Yang Ting, Jacquelin Jia Qi Wong, Mun Kit Wu, Jiaxuan Tan, Xiu Hui Toh, Rachelle Qi En Chiang, Christine Li Ling Ng, Caleb Wei Hao Ng, Jared Chuan Kai Ong, Yun Ting Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen Tay, Kuang Teck Tan, Laura Hui Shuen Phua, Gillian Li Gek Fong, Warren Wijaya, Limin Neo, Shirlyn Hui Shan Lee, Alexia Sze Inn Chiam, Min Chin, Annelissa Mien Chew Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Molding competent clinicians capable of applying ethics principles in their practice is a challenging task, compounded by wide variations in the teaching and assessment of ethics in the postgraduate setting. Despite these differences, ethics training programs should recognise that the transition from medical students to healthcare professionals entails a longitudinal process where ethics knowledge, skills and identity continue to build and deepen over time with clinical exposure. A systematic scoping review is proposed to analyse current postgraduate medical ethics training and assessment programs in peer-reviewed literature to guide the development of a local physician training curriculum. METHODS: With a constructivist perspective and relativist lens, this systematic scoping review on postgraduate medical ethics training and assessment will adopt the Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SEBA) to create a transparent and reproducible review. RESULTS: The first search involving the teaching of ethics yielded 7669 abstracts with 573 full text articles evaluated and 66 articles included. The second search involving the assessment of ethics identified 9919 abstracts with 333 full text articles reviewed and 29 articles included. The themes identified from the two searches were the goals and objectives, content, pedagogy, enabling and limiting factors of teaching ethics and assessment modalities used. Despite inherent disparities in ethics training programs, they provide a platform for learners to apply knowledge, translating it to skill and eventually becoming part of the identity of the learner. Illustrating the longitudinal nature of ethics training, the spiral curriculum seamlessly integrates and fortifies prevailing ethical knowledge acquired in medical school with the layering of new specialty, clinical and research specific content in professional practice. Various assessment methods are employed with special mention of portfolios as a longitudinal assessment modality that showcase the impact of ethics training on the development of professional identity formation (PIF). CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic scoping review has elicited key learning points in the teaching and assessment of ethics in the postgraduate setting. However, more research needs to be done on establishing Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA)s in ethics, with further exploration of the use of portfolios and key factors influencing its design, implementation and assessment of PIF and micro-credentialling in ethics practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02644-5. BioMed Central 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8188952/ /pubmed/34107935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02644-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hong, Daniel Zhihao Goh, Jia Ling Ong, Zhi Yang Ting, Jacquelin Jia Qi Wong, Mun Kit Wu, Jiaxuan Tan, Xiu Hui Toh, Rachelle Qi En Chiang, Christine Li Ling Ng, Caleb Wei Hao Ng, Jared Chuan Kai Ong, Yun Ting Cheong, Clarissa Wei Shuen Tay, Kuang Teck Tan, Laura Hui Shuen Phua, Gillian Li Gek Fong, Warren Wijaya, Limin Neo, Shirlyn Hui Shan Lee, Alexia Sze Inn Chiam, Min Chin, Annelissa Mien Chew Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review |
title | Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review |
title_full | Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review |
title_fullStr | Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review |
title_short | Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review |
title_sort | postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8188952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34107935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02644-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongdanielzhihao postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT gohjialing postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT ongzhiyang postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT tingjacquelinjiaqi postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT wongmunkit postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT wujiaxuan postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT tanxiuhui postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT tohrachelleqien postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT chiangchristineliling postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT ngcalebweihao postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT ngjaredchuankai postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT ongyunting postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT cheongclarissaweishuen postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT taykuangteck postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT tanlaurahuishuen postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT phuagillianligek postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT fongwarren postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT wijayalimin postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT neoshirlynhuishan postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT leealexiaszeinn postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT chiammin postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT chinannelissamienchew postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview AT krishnalalitkumarradha postgraduateethicstrainingprogramsasystematicscopingreview |