Cargando…
Antibody response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (CoronaVac) in immune-mediated diseases: a controlled study among hospital workers and elderly
OBJECTIVE: To assess antibody response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in patients with immune-mediated diseases (IMD) among hospital workers and people aged 65 and older. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we studied 82 hospital workers with IMD (mean age: 42.2 ± 10.0 years) and 300 (mean age:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8188953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34109466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04910-7 |
_version_ | 1783705425286266880 |
---|---|
author | Seyahi, Emire Bakhdiyarli, Guldaran Oztas, Mert Kuskucu, Mert Ahmet Tok, Yesim Sut, Necdet Ozcifci, Guzin Ozcaglayan, Ali Balkan, Ilker Inanc Saltoglu, Nese Tabak, Fehmi Hamuryudan, Vedat |
author_facet | Seyahi, Emire Bakhdiyarli, Guldaran Oztas, Mert Kuskucu, Mert Ahmet Tok, Yesim Sut, Necdet Ozcifci, Guzin Ozcaglayan, Ali Balkan, Ilker Inanc Saltoglu, Nese Tabak, Fehmi Hamuryudan, Vedat |
author_sort | Seyahi, Emire |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess antibody response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in patients with immune-mediated diseases (IMD) among hospital workers and people aged 65 and older. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we studied 82 hospital workers with IMD (mean age: 42.2 ± 10.0 years) and 300 (mean age: 41.7 ± 9.9 years) controls. Among + 65 aged population, we studied 22 (mean age: 71.4 ± 4.5 years) patients and 47 controls (mean age: 70.9 ± 4.8 years). All study subjects had a negative history for COVID-19. Sera were obtained after at least 21 days following the second vaccination. Anti-spike IgG antibody titers were measured quantitatively using a commercially available immunoassay method. RESULTS: Patients with IMD were significantly less likely to have detectable antibodies than healthy controls both among the hospital workers (92.7% vs 99.7%, p < 0.001) and elderly population (77.3% vs 97.9%, p = 0.011). Among patients with IMD, those using immunosuppressive or immune-modulating drugs (64/75, 85.3%) were significantly less likely to have detectable antibodies compared to those off treatment (29/29, 100%) (p = 0.029). Additionally, a negative association between age and the antibody titer categories among patients (r = − 0.352; p < 0.001) and controls (r = − 0.258; p < 0.001) were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Among hospital workers, the vast majority of patients with IMD and immunocompetent controls developed a significant humoral response following the administration of the second dose of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine. This was also true for the elderly population, albeit with lower antibody titers. Immunosuppressive use, particularly rituximab significantly reduced antibody titers. Antibody titers were significantly lower among those aged ≥ 60 years both in patient and control populations. Whether these individuals should get a booster dose warrants further studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-021-04910-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8188953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81889532021-06-10 Antibody response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (CoronaVac) in immune-mediated diseases: a controlled study among hospital workers and elderly Seyahi, Emire Bakhdiyarli, Guldaran Oztas, Mert Kuskucu, Mert Ahmet Tok, Yesim Sut, Necdet Ozcifci, Guzin Ozcaglayan, Ali Balkan, Ilker Inanc Saltoglu, Nese Tabak, Fehmi Hamuryudan, Vedat Rheumatol Int Observational Research OBJECTIVE: To assess antibody response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in patients with immune-mediated diseases (IMD) among hospital workers and people aged 65 and older. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we studied 82 hospital workers with IMD (mean age: 42.2 ± 10.0 years) and 300 (mean age: 41.7 ± 9.9 years) controls. Among + 65 aged population, we studied 22 (mean age: 71.4 ± 4.5 years) patients and 47 controls (mean age: 70.9 ± 4.8 years). All study subjects had a negative history for COVID-19. Sera were obtained after at least 21 days following the second vaccination. Anti-spike IgG antibody titers were measured quantitatively using a commercially available immunoassay method. RESULTS: Patients with IMD were significantly less likely to have detectable antibodies than healthy controls both among the hospital workers (92.7% vs 99.7%, p < 0.001) and elderly population (77.3% vs 97.9%, p = 0.011). Among patients with IMD, those using immunosuppressive or immune-modulating drugs (64/75, 85.3%) were significantly less likely to have detectable antibodies compared to those off treatment (29/29, 100%) (p = 0.029). Additionally, a negative association between age and the antibody titer categories among patients (r = − 0.352; p < 0.001) and controls (r = − 0.258; p < 0.001) were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Among hospital workers, the vast majority of patients with IMD and immunocompetent controls developed a significant humoral response following the administration of the second dose of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine. This was also true for the elderly population, albeit with lower antibody titers. Immunosuppressive use, particularly rituximab significantly reduced antibody titers. Antibody titers were significantly lower among those aged ≥ 60 years both in patient and control populations. Whether these individuals should get a booster dose warrants further studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-021-04910-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8188953/ /pubmed/34109466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04910-7 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Observational Research Seyahi, Emire Bakhdiyarli, Guldaran Oztas, Mert Kuskucu, Mert Ahmet Tok, Yesim Sut, Necdet Ozcifci, Guzin Ozcaglayan, Ali Balkan, Ilker Inanc Saltoglu, Nese Tabak, Fehmi Hamuryudan, Vedat Antibody response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (CoronaVac) in immune-mediated diseases: a controlled study among hospital workers and elderly |
title | Antibody response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (CoronaVac) in immune-mediated diseases: a controlled study among hospital workers and elderly |
title_full | Antibody response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (CoronaVac) in immune-mediated diseases: a controlled study among hospital workers and elderly |
title_fullStr | Antibody response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (CoronaVac) in immune-mediated diseases: a controlled study among hospital workers and elderly |
title_full_unstemmed | Antibody response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (CoronaVac) in immune-mediated diseases: a controlled study among hospital workers and elderly |
title_short | Antibody response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (CoronaVac) in immune-mediated diseases: a controlled study among hospital workers and elderly |
title_sort | antibody response to inactivated covid-19 vaccine (coronavac) in immune-mediated diseases: a controlled study among hospital workers and elderly |
topic | Observational Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8188953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34109466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04910-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seyahiemire antibodyresponsetoinactivatedcovid19vaccinecoronavacinimmunemediateddiseasesacontrolledstudyamonghospitalworkersandelderly AT bakhdiyarliguldaran antibodyresponsetoinactivatedcovid19vaccinecoronavacinimmunemediateddiseasesacontrolledstudyamonghospitalworkersandelderly AT oztasmert antibodyresponsetoinactivatedcovid19vaccinecoronavacinimmunemediateddiseasesacontrolledstudyamonghospitalworkersandelderly AT kuskucumertahmet antibodyresponsetoinactivatedcovid19vaccinecoronavacinimmunemediateddiseasesacontrolledstudyamonghospitalworkersandelderly AT tokyesim antibodyresponsetoinactivatedcovid19vaccinecoronavacinimmunemediateddiseasesacontrolledstudyamonghospitalworkersandelderly AT sutnecdet antibodyresponsetoinactivatedcovid19vaccinecoronavacinimmunemediateddiseasesacontrolledstudyamonghospitalworkersandelderly AT ozcifciguzin antibodyresponsetoinactivatedcovid19vaccinecoronavacinimmunemediateddiseasesacontrolledstudyamonghospitalworkersandelderly AT ozcaglayanali antibodyresponsetoinactivatedcovid19vaccinecoronavacinimmunemediateddiseasesacontrolledstudyamonghospitalworkersandelderly AT balkanilkerinanc antibodyresponsetoinactivatedcovid19vaccinecoronavacinimmunemediateddiseasesacontrolledstudyamonghospitalworkersandelderly AT saltoglunese antibodyresponsetoinactivatedcovid19vaccinecoronavacinimmunemediateddiseasesacontrolledstudyamonghospitalworkersandelderly AT tabakfehmi antibodyresponsetoinactivatedcovid19vaccinecoronavacinimmunemediateddiseasesacontrolledstudyamonghospitalworkersandelderly AT hamuryudanvedat antibodyresponsetoinactivatedcovid19vaccinecoronavacinimmunemediateddiseasesacontrolledstudyamonghospitalworkersandelderly |