Cargando…
Comparison of Two Simulated Procedural Assessment Formats in Attending Emergency Physicians
Background Emergency physicians must be proficient at inserting central venous catheters and performing lumbar punctures to provide life-saving therapies to critically ill patients. An assessment of procedural skill is rarely performed after an emergency physician has completed residency. Current bo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8189535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34123640 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14943 |
_version_ | 1783705517664763904 |
---|---|
author | Hock, Sara M Shah, Shital C Perumalsamy, Priya D Sergel, Michelle |
author_facet | Hock, Sara M Shah, Shital C Perumalsamy, Priya D Sergel, Michelle |
author_sort | Hock, Sara M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Emergency physicians must be proficient at inserting central venous catheters and performing lumbar punctures to provide life-saving therapies to critically ill patients. An assessment of procedural skill is rarely performed after an emergency physician has completed residency. Current board certification exams for emergency medicine focus only on verbal descriptions of procedures to assess skill. We compared two methods of procedural skill assessment, simulated task trainer and verbal description, to assess the range of skill in central venous catheter insertion and lumbar punctures of emergency attending physicians at a large, urban, academic tertiary care institution. Methodology This is a prospective cohort study of simulated internal jugular central venous catheter insertion and lumbar puncture skill by emergency attending physicians on a task trainer versus verbal description. A total of 17 attending emergency medicine physicians consented to participate in the study during a yearly procedural skills session. For each subject, two expert raters used previously published checklists to assess procedural skill and give a global rating score. Results More checklist items were performed correctly on the task trainer than on verbal assessment for central line (task trainer = 78.4% ± 8.32% and verbal = 68.26% ± 8.9%) and lumbar puncture (task trainer = 85.57% ± 7.6% and verbal = 73.53%4 ± 10.34%) procedures, both with significant differences (p < 0.001). Of the participants, 82% strongly preferred the task trainer format to the verbal description assessment format. Conclusions The higher scores on the simulated format compared to the current verbal format imply that a shift towards simulated procedural assessment techniques may benefit examinees. More work is needed to determine if objective checklist scores for practicing attending emergency physicians correlate with subjective expert assessments of their procedural skills. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8189535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81895352021-06-10 Comparison of Two Simulated Procedural Assessment Formats in Attending Emergency Physicians Hock, Sara M Shah, Shital C Perumalsamy, Priya D Sergel, Michelle Cureus Emergency Medicine Background Emergency physicians must be proficient at inserting central venous catheters and performing lumbar punctures to provide life-saving therapies to critically ill patients. An assessment of procedural skill is rarely performed after an emergency physician has completed residency. Current board certification exams for emergency medicine focus only on verbal descriptions of procedures to assess skill. We compared two methods of procedural skill assessment, simulated task trainer and verbal description, to assess the range of skill in central venous catheter insertion and lumbar punctures of emergency attending physicians at a large, urban, academic tertiary care institution. Methodology This is a prospective cohort study of simulated internal jugular central venous catheter insertion and lumbar puncture skill by emergency attending physicians on a task trainer versus verbal description. A total of 17 attending emergency medicine physicians consented to participate in the study during a yearly procedural skills session. For each subject, two expert raters used previously published checklists to assess procedural skill and give a global rating score. Results More checklist items were performed correctly on the task trainer than on verbal assessment for central line (task trainer = 78.4% ± 8.32% and verbal = 68.26% ± 8.9%) and lumbar puncture (task trainer = 85.57% ± 7.6% and verbal = 73.53%4 ± 10.34%) procedures, both with significant differences (p < 0.001). Of the participants, 82% strongly preferred the task trainer format to the verbal description assessment format. Conclusions The higher scores on the simulated format compared to the current verbal format imply that a shift towards simulated procedural assessment techniques may benefit examinees. More work is needed to determine if objective checklist scores for practicing attending emergency physicians correlate with subjective expert assessments of their procedural skills. Cureus 2021-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8189535/ /pubmed/34123640 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14943 Text en Copyright © 2021, Hock et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Hock, Sara M Shah, Shital C Perumalsamy, Priya D Sergel, Michelle Comparison of Two Simulated Procedural Assessment Formats in Attending Emergency Physicians |
title | Comparison of Two Simulated Procedural Assessment Formats in Attending Emergency Physicians |
title_full | Comparison of Two Simulated Procedural Assessment Formats in Attending Emergency Physicians |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Two Simulated Procedural Assessment Formats in Attending Emergency Physicians |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Two Simulated Procedural Assessment Formats in Attending Emergency Physicians |
title_short | Comparison of Two Simulated Procedural Assessment Formats in Attending Emergency Physicians |
title_sort | comparison of two simulated procedural assessment formats in attending emergency physicians |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8189535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34123640 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14943 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hocksaram comparisonoftwosimulatedproceduralassessmentformatsinattendingemergencyphysicians AT shahshitalc comparisonoftwosimulatedproceduralassessmentformatsinattendingemergencyphysicians AT perumalsamypriyad comparisonoftwosimulatedproceduralassessmentformatsinattendingemergencyphysicians AT sergelmichelle comparisonoftwosimulatedproceduralassessmentformatsinattendingemergencyphysicians |