Cargando…
Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values
BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential to reduce disease spread. Rapid antigen tests have not been sufficiently evaluated in asymptomatic patients to be used as massive population screening tools. METHODS: Head-to-head evaluation of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test and r...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8189541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34127960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100954 |
_version_ | 1783705519049932800 |
---|---|
author | Fernandez-Montero, Alejandro Argemi, Josepmaria Rodríguez, José Antonio Ariño, Arturo H. Moreno-Galarraga, Laura |
author_facet | Fernandez-Montero, Alejandro Argemi, Josepmaria Rodríguez, José Antonio Ariño, Arturo H. Moreno-Galarraga, Laura |
author_sort | Fernandez-Montero, Alejandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential to reduce disease spread. Rapid antigen tests have not been sufficiently evaluated in asymptomatic patients to be used as massive population screening tools. METHODS: Head-to-head evaluation of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as SARS-CoV-2 screening tools performed in asymptomatic adults from a semi-closed community in University of Navarra (Spain) from November 2020 to January 2021. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated using RT-PCR as reference method. FINDINGS: Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test was performed on 2542 asymptomatic adults in a community with a SARS-CoV-2 incidence of 1·93%. It showed a sensitivity of 71·43% (CI 95%: 56·74 – 83·42) and a specificity of 99·68% (CI 95%: 99·37 - 99·86). Positive Predictive Value was 81·4 (CI 95% 66·6 – 91·61) and Negative Predictive Value was 99·44 (CI 95% 99·06 – 99·69). Test sensitivity was related to viral load, with higher sensitivity in RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values under 25 (93·75%, CI 95%: 71·96 – 98·93), that dropped to 29·41% (CI 95%: 10·31- 55·96) in RT-PCR Ct values above 25. INTERPRETATION: This study suggests that rapid antigen tests are less effective in asymptomatic population, when compared with RT-PCR. Further studies are needed to evaluate different options to improve screenings based on rapid antigen test, such as the use of clinical questionnaires to select higher risk-participants, the confirmation of negative results with RT-PCR or the use of repetitive sequential testing. FUNDING: This research received no external funding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8189541 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81895412021-06-10 Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values Fernandez-Montero, Alejandro Argemi, Josepmaria Rodríguez, José Antonio Ariño, Arturo H. Moreno-Galarraga, Laura EClinicalMedicine Research Paper BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential to reduce disease spread. Rapid antigen tests have not been sufficiently evaluated in asymptomatic patients to be used as massive population screening tools. METHODS: Head-to-head evaluation of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as SARS-CoV-2 screening tools performed in asymptomatic adults from a semi-closed community in University of Navarra (Spain) from November 2020 to January 2021. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated using RT-PCR as reference method. FINDINGS: Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test was performed on 2542 asymptomatic adults in a community with a SARS-CoV-2 incidence of 1·93%. It showed a sensitivity of 71·43% (CI 95%: 56·74 – 83·42) and a specificity of 99·68% (CI 95%: 99·37 - 99·86). Positive Predictive Value was 81·4 (CI 95% 66·6 – 91·61) and Negative Predictive Value was 99·44 (CI 95% 99·06 – 99·69). Test sensitivity was related to viral load, with higher sensitivity in RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values under 25 (93·75%, CI 95%: 71·96 – 98·93), that dropped to 29·41% (CI 95%: 10·31- 55·96) in RT-PCR Ct values above 25. INTERPRETATION: This study suggests that rapid antigen tests are less effective in asymptomatic population, when compared with RT-PCR. Further studies are needed to evaluate different options to improve screenings based on rapid antigen test, such as the use of clinical questionnaires to select higher risk-participants, the confirmation of negative results with RT-PCR or the use of repetitive sequential testing. FUNDING: This research received no external funding. Elsevier 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8189541/ /pubmed/34127960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100954 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Fernandez-Montero, Alejandro Argemi, Josepmaria Rodríguez, José Antonio Ariño, Arturo H. Moreno-Galarraga, Laura Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values |
title | Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values |
title_full | Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values |
title_fullStr | Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values |
title_short | Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values |
title_sort | validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for sars-cov-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. sensitivity, specificity and predictive values |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8189541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34127960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100954 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fernandezmonteroalejandro validationofarapidantigentestasascreeningtoolforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticpopulationssensitivityspecificityandpredictivevalues AT argemijosepmaria validationofarapidantigentestasascreeningtoolforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticpopulationssensitivityspecificityandpredictivevalues AT rodriguezjoseantonio validationofarapidantigentestasascreeningtoolforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticpopulationssensitivityspecificityandpredictivevalues AT arinoarturoh validationofarapidantigentestasascreeningtoolforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticpopulationssensitivityspecificityandpredictivevalues AT morenogalarragalaura validationofarapidantigentestasascreeningtoolforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticpopulationssensitivityspecificityandpredictivevalues |