Cargando…

Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential to reduce disease spread. Rapid antigen tests have not been sufficiently evaluated in asymptomatic patients to be used as massive population screening tools. METHODS: Head-to-head evaluation of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test and r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernandez-Montero, Alejandro, Argemi, Josepmaria, Rodríguez, José Antonio, Ariño, Arturo H., Moreno-Galarraga, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8189541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34127960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100954
_version_ 1783705519049932800
author Fernandez-Montero, Alejandro
Argemi, Josepmaria
Rodríguez, José Antonio
Ariño, Arturo H.
Moreno-Galarraga, Laura
author_facet Fernandez-Montero, Alejandro
Argemi, Josepmaria
Rodríguez, José Antonio
Ariño, Arturo H.
Moreno-Galarraga, Laura
author_sort Fernandez-Montero, Alejandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential to reduce disease spread. Rapid antigen tests have not been sufficiently evaluated in asymptomatic patients to be used as massive population screening tools. METHODS: Head-to-head evaluation of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as SARS-CoV-2 screening tools performed in asymptomatic adults from a semi-closed community in University of Navarra (Spain) from November 2020 to January 2021. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated using RT-PCR as reference method. FINDINGS: Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test was performed on 2542 asymptomatic adults in a community with a SARS-CoV-2 incidence of 1·93%. It showed a sensitivity of 71·43% (CI 95%: 56·74 – 83·42) and a specificity of 99·68% (CI 95%: 99·37 - 99·86). Positive Predictive Value was 81·4 (CI 95% 66·6 – 91·61) and Negative Predictive Value was 99·44 (CI 95% 99·06 – 99·69). Test sensitivity was related to viral load, with higher sensitivity in RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values under 25 (93·75%, CI 95%: 71·96 – 98·93), that dropped to 29·41% (CI 95%: 10·31- 55·96) in RT-PCR Ct values above 25. INTERPRETATION: This study suggests that rapid antigen tests are less effective in asymptomatic population, when compared with RT-PCR. Further studies are needed to evaluate different options to improve screenings based on rapid antigen test, such as the use of clinical questionnaires to select higher risk-participants, the confirmation of negative results with RT-PCR or the use of repetitive sequential testing. FUNDING: This research received no external funding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8189541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81895412021-06-10 Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values Fernandez-Montero, Alejandro Argemi, Josepmaria Rodríguez, José Antonio Ariño, Arturo H. Moreno-Galarraga, Laura EClinicalMedicine Research Paper BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential to reduce disease spread. Rapid antigen tests have not been sufficiently evaluated in asymptomatic patients to be used as massive population screening tools. METHODS: Head-to-head evaluation of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as SARS-CoV-2 screening tools performed in asymptomatic adults from a semi-closed community in University of Navarra (Spain) from November 2020 to January 2021. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated using RT-PCR as reference method. FINDINGS: Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test was performed on 2542 asymptomatic adults in a community with a SARS-CoV-2 incidence of 1·93%. It showed a sensitivity of 71·43% (CI 95%: 56·74 – 83·42) and a specificity of 99·68% (CI 95%: 99·37 - 99·86). Positive Predictive Value was 81·4 (CI 95% 66·6 – 91·61) and Negative Predictive Value was 99·44 (CI 95% 99·06 – 99·69). Test sensitivity was related to viral load, with higher sensitivity in RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values under 25 (93·75%, CI 95%: 71·96 – 98·93), that dropped to 29·41% (CI 95%: 10·31- 55·96) in RT-PCR Ct values above 25. INTERPRETATION: This study suggests that rapid antigen tests are less effective in asymptomatic population, when compared with RT-PCR. Further studies are needed to evaluate different options to improve screenings based on rapid antigen test, such as the use of clinical questionnaires to select higher risk-participants, the confirmation of negative results with RT-PCR or the use of repetitive sequential testing. FUNDING: This research received no external funding. Elsevier 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8189541/ /pubmed/34127960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100954 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Fernandez-Montero, Alejandro
Argemi, Josepmaria
Rodríguez, José Antonio
Ariño, Arturo H.
Moreno-Galarraga, Laura
Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values
title Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values
title_full Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values
title_fullStr Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values
title_short Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values
title_sort validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for sars-cov-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. sensitivity, specificity and predictive values
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8189541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34127960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100954
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezmonteroalejandro validationofarapidantigentestasascreeningtoolforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticpopulationssensitivityspecificityandpredictivevalues
AT argemijosepmaria validationofarapidantigentestasascreeningtoolforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticpopulationssensitivityspecificityandpredictivevalues
AT rodriguezjoseantonio validationofarapidantigentestasascreeningtoolforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticpopulationssensitivityspecificityandpredictivevalues
AT arinoarturoh validationofarapidantigentestasascreeningtoolforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticpopulationssensitivityspecificityandpredictivevalues
AT morenogalarragalaura validationofarapidantigentestasascreeningtoolforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticpopulationssensitivityspecificityandpredictivevalues