Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate versus Other Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis
In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who experience further exacerbations or symptoms, despite being prescribed dual long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA) or inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/LABA therapies, triple ICS/LAMA/LABA therapy is recom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8189959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33929661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01703-z |
_version_ | 1783705591848370176 |
---|---|
author | Bourdin, Arnaud Molinari, Nicolas Ferguson, Gary T. Singh, Barinder Siddiqui, Mohd Kashif Holmgren, Ulf Ouwens, Mario Jenkins, Martin De Nigris, Enrico |
author_facet | Bourdin, Arnaud Molinari, Nicolas Ferguson, Gary T. Singh, Barinder Siddiqui, Mohd Kashif Holmgren, Ulf Ouwens, Mario Jenkins, Martin De Nigris, Enrico |
author_sort | Bourdin, Arnaud |
collection | PubMed |
description | In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who experience further exacerbations or symptoms, despite being prescribed dual long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA) or inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/LABA therapies, triple ICS/LAMA/LABA therapy is recommended. A previous network meta-analysis showed comparable efficacy of the ICS/LAMA/LABA, budesonide/glycopyrronium bromide/formoterol fumarate (BUD/GLY/FOR) 320/18/9.6 µg, to other fixed-dose and open combination triple therapies at 24 weeks in COPD. Subsequently, the ETHOS study was published, including data for 8509 patients, assessing the efficacy and safety of BUD/GLY/FOR over 52 weeks. This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the relative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of BUD/GLY/FOR 320/18/9.6 µg with other fixed-dose and open combination triple therapies in COPD over 52 weeks, including data from ETHOS. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify ≥ 10-week randomized controlled trials, including ≥ 1 fixed-dose or open combination triple-therapy arm, in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. The methodologic quality and risk of bias of included studies were assessed. Study results were combined using a three-level hierarchical Bayesian NMA model to assess efficacy and safety outcomes at or over 24 and 52 weeks. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were used to assess heterogeneity across studies. Nineteen studies (n = 37,741 patients) met the inclusion criteria of the review; 15 contributed to the base case network. LAMA/LABA dual combinations were combined as a single treatment group to create a connected network. Across all outcomes for exacerbations, lung function, symptoms, health-related quality of life, safety, and tolerability, the efficacy and safety of BUD/GLY/FOR were comparable to those of other triple ICS/LAMA/LABA fixed-dose (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol and beclomethasone dipropionate/glycopyrronium bromide/formoterol fumarate) and open combinations at or over 24 and 52 weeks. Sensitivity analyses and meta-regression results for exacerbation outcomes were broadly in line with the base case NMA. In this NMA, BUD/GLY/FOR 320/18/9.6 μg showed comparable efficacy versus other ICS/LAMA/LABA fixed-dose or open combination therapies in terms of reducing exacerbation rates and improving lung function, symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD, in line with previously published meta-analysis results of triple combinations in COPD. The safety and tolerability profile of BUD/GLY/FOR was also found to be comparable to other triple combination therapies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01703-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8189959 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81899592021-06-28 Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate versus Other Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis Bourdin, Arnaud Molinari, Nicolas Ferguson, Gary T. Singh, Barinder Siddiqui, Mohd Kashif Holmgren, Ulf Ouwens, Mario Jenkins, Martin De Nigris, Enrico Adv Ther Original Research In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who experience further exacerbations or symptoms, despite being prescribed dual long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA) or inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/LABA therapies, triple ICS/LAMA/LABA therapy is recommended. A previous network meta-analysis showed comparable efficacy of the ICS/LAMA/LABA, budesonide/glycopyrronium bromide/formoterol fumarate (BUD/GLY/FOR) 320/18/9.6 µg, to other fixed-dose and open combination triple therapies at 24 weeks in COPD. Subsequently, the ETHOS study was published, including data for 8509 patients, assessing the efficacy and safety of BUD/GLY/FOR over 52 weeks. This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the relative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of BUD/GLY/FOR 320/18/9.6 µg with other fixed-dose and open combination triple therapies in COPD over 52 weeks, including data from ETHOS. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify ≥ 10-week randomized controlled trials, including ≥ 1 fixed-dose or open combination triple-therapy arm, in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. The methodologic quality and risk of bias of included studies were assessed. Study results were combined using a three-level hierarchical Bayesian NMA model to assess efficacy and safety outcomes at or over 24 and 52 weeks. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were used to assess heterogeneity across studies. Nineteen studies (n = 37,741 patients) met the inclusion criteria of the review; 15 contributed to the base case network. LAMA/LABA dual combinations were combined as a single treatment group to create a connected network. Across all outcomes for exacerbations, lung function, symptoms, health-related quality of life, safety, and tolerability, the efficacy and safety of BUD/GLY/FOR were comparable to those of other triple ICS/LAMA/LABA fixed-dose (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol and beclomethasone dipropionate/glycopyrronium bromide/formoterol fumarate) and open combinations at or over 24 and 52 weeks. Sensitivity analyses and meta-regression results for exacerbation outcomes were broadly in line with the base case NMA. In this NMA, BUD/GLY/FOR 320/18/9.6 μg showed comparable efficacy versus other ICS/LAMA/LABA fixed-dose or open combination therapies in terms of reducing exacerbation rates and improving lung function, symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD, in line with previously published meta-analysis results of triple combinations in COPD. The safety and tolerability profile of BUD/GLY/FOR was also found to be comparable to other triple combination therapies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01703-z. Springer Healthcare 2021-04-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8189959/ /pubmed/33929661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01703-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bourdin, Arnaud Molinari, Nicolas Ferguson, Gary T. Singh, Barinder Siddiqui, Mohd Kashif Holmgren, Ulf Ouwens, Mario Jenkins, Martin De Nigris, Enrico Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate versus Other Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate versus Other Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate versus Other Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate versus Other Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate versus Other Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate versus Other Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate versus other triple combinations in copd: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8189959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33929661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01703-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bourdinarnaud efficacyandsafetyofbudesonideglycopyrroniumformoterolfumarateversusothertriplecombinationsincopdasystematicliteraturereviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT molinarinicolas efficacyandsafetyofbudesonideglycopyrroniumformoterolfumarateversusothertriplecombinationsincopdasystematicliteraturereviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT fergusongaryt efficacyandsafetyofbudesonideglycopyrroniumformoterolfumarateversusothertriplecombinationsincopdasystematicliteraturereviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT singhbarinder efficacyandsafetyofbudesonideglycopyrroniumformoterolfumarateversusothertriplecombinationsincopdasystematicliteraturereviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT siddiquimohdkashif efficacyandsafetyofbudesonideglycopyrroniumformoterolfumarateversusothertriplecombinationsincopdasystematicliteraturereviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT holmgrenulf efficacyandsafetyofbudesonideglycopyrroniumformoterolfumarateversusothertriplecombinationsincopdasystematicliteraturereviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT ouwensmario efficacyandsafetyofbudesonideglycopyrroniumformoterolfumarateversusothertriplecombinationsincopdasystematicliteraturereviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT jenkinsmartin efficacyandsafetyofbudesonideglycopyrroniumformoterolfumarateversusothertriplecombinationsincopdasystematicliteraturereviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT denigrisenrico efficacyandsafetyofbudesonideglycopyrroniumformoterolfumarateversusothertriplecombinationsincopdasystematicliteraturereviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |