Cargando…
Evaluation of the Octreotide Acetate Pen Injector and its Instructions for Use in a Formative Human Factors Study
INTRODUCTION: Octreotide acetate subcutaneous injection is indicated to treat acromegaly and the symptoms of carcinoid tumors and vasoactive intestinal peptide tumors (VIPomas). This formative human factors study assessed the octreotide acetate pen injector and accompanying instructions for use (IFU...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8189973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01739-1 |
_version_ | 1783705595225833472 |
---|---|
author | Andre, Anthony Squittieri, Nicholas Patil, Satyashodhan B. |
author_facet | Andre, Anthony Squittieri, Nicholas Patil, Satyashodhan B. |
author_sort | Andre, Anthony |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Octreotide acetate subcutaneous injection is indicated to treat acromegaly and the symptoms of carcinoid tumors and vasoactive intestinal peptide tumors (VIPomas). This formative human factors study assessed the octreotide acetate pen injector and accompanying instructions for use (IFU) with self-trained participants. METHODS: The study enrolled patients with diagnoses of acromegaly, carcinoid tumors, or VIPomas and healthcare practitioners (HCPs) who treat patients with these diagnoses. The IFU provided a stepwise process with illustrations to train participants on using the pen injector. Participants familiarized themselves with the pen injector and the IFU before administering 2 unaided injections into skin-like pads; administering the full dose into the pad was considered a successful injection. The investigators evaluated each injection by performance measures—specific tasks necessary to safely and correctly administer the medication—and subjective measures, which included participant comments, feedback from questions, and suggestions for improvements. RESULTS: The study enrolled 11 participants—8 patients and 3 HCPs. Participants had a success rate of 100% for both injections. Errors included 1 participant priming the pen with the incorrect dose and 2 participants not holding the injector button for 10 s after the injection. Neither error led to a failed injection. To improve the IFU, participants suggested changing the order of wording on the priming step, clarifying illustrations of the plunger, and stronger indications to hold the injector button. CONCLUSION: The octreotide pen injector and IFU were usable by self-trained participants. Participant errors and suggestions provided a foundation for recommendations to improve the IFU. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01739-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8189973 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81899732021-06-28 Evaluation of the Octreotide Acetate Pen Injector and its Instructions for Use in a Formative Human Factors Study Andre, Anthony Squittieri, Nicholas Patil, Satyashodhan B. Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Octreotide acetate subcutaneous injection is indicated to treat acromegaly and the symptoms of carcinoid tumors and vasoactive intestinal peptide tumors (VIPomas). This formative human factors study assessed the octreotide acetate pen injector and accompanying instructions for use (IFU) with self-trained participants. METHODS: The study enrolled patients with diagnoses of acromegaly, carcinoid tumors, or VIPomas and healthcare practitioners (HCPs) who treat patients with these diagnoses. The IFU provided a stepwise process with illustrations to train participants on using the pen injector. Participants familiarized themselves with the pen injector and the IFU before administering 2 unaided injections into skin-like pads; administering the full dose into the pad was considered a successful injection. The investigators evaluated each injection by performance measures—specific tasks necessary to safely and correctly administer the medication—and subjective measures, which included participant comments, feedback from questions, and suggestions for improvements. RESULTS: The study enrolled 11 participants—8 patients and 3 HCPs. Participants had a success rate of 100% for both injections. Errors included 1 participant priming the pen with the incorrect dose and 2 participants not holding the injector button for 10 s after the injection. Neither error led to a failed injection. To improve the IFU, participants suggested changing the order of wording on the priming step, clarifying illustrations of the plunger, and stronger indications to hold the injector button. CONCLUSION: The octreotide pen injector and IFU were usable by self-trained participants. Participant errors and suggestions provided a foundation for recommendations to improve the IFU. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01739-1. Springer Healthcare 2021-05-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8189973/ /pubmed/33948925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01739-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Andre, Anthony Squittieri, Nicholas Patil, Satyashodhan B. Evaluation of the Octreotide Acetate Pen Injector and its Instructions for Use in a Formative Human Factors Study |
title | Evaluation of the Octreotide Acetate Pen Injector and its Instructions for Use in a Formative Human Factors Study |
title_full | Evaluation of the Octreotide Acetate Pen Injector and its Instructions for Use in a Formative Human Factors Study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Octreotide Acetate Pen Injector and its Instructions for Use in a Formative Human Factors Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Octreotide Acetate Pen Injector and its Instructions for Use in a Formative Human Factors Study |
title_short | Evaluation of the Octreotide Acetate Pen Injector and its Instructions for Use in a Formative Human Factors Study |
title_sort | evaluation of the octreotide acetate pen injector and its instructions for use in a formative human factors study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8189973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01739-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andreanthony evaluationoftheoctreotideacetatepeninjectoranditsinstructionsforuseinaformativehumanfactorsstudy AT squittierinicholas evaluationoftheoctreotideacetatepeninjectoranditsinstructionsforuseinaformativehumanfactorsstudy AT patilsatyashodhanb evaluationoftheoctreotideacetatepeninjectoranditsinstructionsforuseinaformativehumanfactorsstudy |