Cargando…
What is the effect of supervised rehabilitation regime vs. self-management instruction following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? – a pilot study in two cohorts
PURPOSE: The optimal rehabilitation strategy after a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is unclear. This study aims to compare the effect of transitioning from a supervised to a self-management rehabilitation regime by pilot study of patient outcomes subsequent to UKA surgery. METHODS: Fifty c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8190216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34106345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00354-x |
_version_ | 1783705644541411328 |
---|---|
author | Omari, Adam Ingelsrud, Lina Holm Bandholm, Thomas Quaade Lentz, Susanne Irene Troelsen, Anders Gromov, Kirill |
author_facet | Omari, Adam Ingelsrud, Lina Holm Bandholm, Thomas Quaade Lentz, Susanne Irene Troelsen, Anders Gromov, Kirill |
author_sort | Omari, Adam |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The optimal rehabilitation strategy after a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is unclear. This study aims to compare the effect of transitioning from a supervised to a self-management rehabilitation regime by pilot study of patient outcomes subsequent to UKA surgery. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients scheduled to undergo unilateral UKA surgery at our institution between 22(nd) February 2016 and 18(th)of January 2017 were prospectively identified via local medical database and included. Performed UKAs were grouped into two cohorts, Supervised Cohort and Self-management Cohort, temporally separated by introduction of new rehabilitation. Self-management Cohort(n = 25) received an extensive inpatient rehabilitation regime along with outpatient referral to rehabilitation center. The Self-management Cohort(n = 25) were only instructed in use of crutches and free ambulation at own accord. Follow-up (F/U) was 1 year from receiving UKA. A range of outcomes were recorded, and between-cohort differences compared: knee joint range of motion, pain and functional limitations, length of stay (LOS), readmission rate, pain during activity and rest, and knee circumference. RESULTS: Complete data was obtained for n = 45 patients. The mean between-cohort difference in ROM (range of motion) from preoperatively to discharge was 15.4 degrees (CI:5.2,25.8, p = 0.004), favoring the supervised regime, with no difference detected in any outcome at 3- or 12 months F/U. Median LOS was 1 day in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Transition to a simple rehabilitation regime following UKA surgery was associated with decreased ROM at discharge, which was not present at 3-month F/U. We found no other between-cohort differences for any other outcomes at 3- and 12-month F/U including functional limitations, although the study was likely underpowered for these outcomes. We encourage large-scale replication of these findings using randomized designs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level II |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8190216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81902162021-06-10 What is the effect of supervised rehabilitation regime vs. self-management instruction following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? – a pilot study in two cohorts Omari, Adam Ingelsrud, Lina Holm Bandholm, Thomas Quaade Lentz, Susanne Irene Troelsen, Anders Gromov, Kirill J Exp Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: The optimal rehabilitation strategy after a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is unclear. This study aims to compare the effect of transitioning from a supervised to a self-management rehabilitation regime by pilot study of patient outcomes subsequent to UKA surgery. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients scheduled to undergo unilateral UKA surgery at our institution between 22(nd) February 2016 and 18(th)of January 2017 were prospectively identified via local medical database and included. Performed UKAs were grouped into two cohorts, Supervised Cohort and Self-management Cohort, temporally separated by introduction of new rehabilitation. Self-management Cohort(n = 25) received an extensive inpatient rehabilitation regime along with outpatient referral to rehabilitation center. The Self-management Cohort(n = 25) were only instructed in use of crutches and free ambulation at own accord. Follow-up (F/U) was 1 year from receiving UKA. A range of outcomes were recorded, and between-cohort differences compared: knee joint range of motion, pain and functional limitations, length of stay (LOS), readmission rate, pain during activity and rest, and knee circumference. RESULTS: Complete data was obtained for n = 45 patients. The mean between-cohort difference in ROM (range of motion) from preoperatively to discharge was 15.4 degrees (CI:5.2,25.8, p = 0.004), favoring the supervised regime, with no difference detected in any outcome at 3- or 12 months F/U. Median LOS was 1 day in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Transition to a simple rehabilitation regime following UKA surgery was associated with decreased ROM at discharge, which was not present at 3-month F/U. We found no other between-cohort differences for any other outcomes at 3- and 12-month F/U including functional limitations, although the study was likely underpowered for these outcomes. We encourage large-scale replication of these findings using randomized designs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level II Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8190216/ /pubmed/34106345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00354-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Omari, Adam Ingelsrud, Lina Holm Bandholm, Thomas Quaade Lentz, Susanne Irene Troelsen, Anders Gromov, Kirill What is the effect of supervised rehabilitation regime vs. self-management instruction following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? – a pilot study in two cohorts |
title | What is the effect of supervised rehabilitation regime vs. self-management instruction following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? – a pilot study in two cohorts |
title_full | What is the effect of supervised rehabilitation regime vs. self-management instruction following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? – a pilot study in two cohorts |
title_fullStr | What is the effect of supervised rehabilitation regime vs. self-management instruction following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? – a pilot study in two cohorts |
title_full_unstemmed | What is the effect of supervised rehabilitation regime vs. self-management instruction following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? – a pilot study in two cohorts |
title_short | What is the effect of supervised rehabilitation regime vs. self-management instruction following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? – a pilot study in two cohorts |
title_sort | what is the effect of supervised rehabilitation regime vs. self-management instruction following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? – a pilot study in two cohorts |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8190216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34106345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00354-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT omariadam whatistheeffectofsupervisedrehabilitationregimevsselfmanagementinstructionfollowingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyapilotstudyintwocohorts AT ingelsrudlinaholm whatistheeffectofsupervisedrehabilitationregimevsselfmanagementinstructionfollowingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyapilotstudyintwocohorts AT bandholmthomasquaade whatistheeffectofsupervisedrehabilitationregimevsselfmanagementinstructionfollowingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyapilotstudyintwocohorts AT lentzsusanneirene whatistheeffectofsupervisedrehabilitationregimevsselfmanagementinstructionfollowingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyapilotstudyintwocohorts AT troelsenanders whatistheeffectofsupervisedrehabilitationregimevsselfmanagementinstructionfollowingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyapilotstudyintwocohorts AT gromovkirill whatistheeffectofsupervisedrehabilitationregimevsselfmanagementinstructionfollowingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyapilotstudyintwocohorts |