Cargando…
GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning
Molecular docking computationally predicts the conformation of a small molecule when binding to a receptor. Scoring functions are a vital piece of any molecular docking pipeline as they determine the fitness of sampled poses. Here we describe and evaluate the 1.0 release of the Gnina docking softwar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34108002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00522-2 |
_version_ | 1783705818691010560 |
---|---|
author | McNutt, Andrew T. Francoeur, Paul Aggarwal, Rishal Masuda, Tomohide Meli, Rocco Ragoza, Matthew Sunseri, Jocelyn Koes, David Ryan |
author_facet | McNutt, Andrew T. Francoeur, Paul Aggarwal, Rishal Masuda, Tomohide Meli, Rocco Ragoza, Matthew Sunseri, Jocelyn Koes, David Ryan |
author_sort | McNutt, Andrew T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Molecular docking computationally predicts the conformation of a small molecule when binding to a receptor. Scoring functions are a vital piece of any molecular docking pipeline as they determine the fitness of sampled poses. Here we describe and evaluate the 1.0 release of the Gnina docking software, which utilizes an ensemble of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as a scoring function. We also explore an array of parameter values for Gnina 1.0 to optimize docking performance and computational cost. Docking performance, as evaluated by the percentage of targets where the top pose is better than 2Å root mean square deviation (Top1), is compared to AutoDock Vina scoring when utilizing explicitly defined binding pockets or whole protein docking. Gnina, utilizing a CNN scoring function to rescore the output poses, outperforms AutoDock Vina scoring on redocking and cross-docking tasks when the binding pocket is defined (Top1 increases from 58% to 73% and from 27% to 37%, respectively) and when the whole protein defines the binding pocket (Top1 increases from 31% to 38% and from 12% to 16%, respectively). The derived ensemble of CNNs generalizes to unseen proteins and ligands and produces scores that correlate well with the root mean square deviation to the known binding pose. We provide the 1.0 version of Gnina under an open source license for use as a molecular docking tool at https://github.com/gnina/gnina. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13321-021-00522-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8191141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81911412021-06-10 GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning McNutt, Andrew T. Francoeur, Paul Aggarwal, Rishal Masuda, Tomohide Meli, Rocco Ragoza, Matthew Sunseri, Jocelyn Koes, David Ryan J Cheminform Software Molecular docking computationally predicts the conformation of a small molecule when binding to a receptor. Scoring functions are a vital piece of any molecular docking pipeline as they determine the fitness of sampled poses. Here we describe and evaluate the 1.0 release of the Gnina docking software, which utilizes an ensemble of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as a scoring function. We also explore an array of parameter values for Gnina 1.0 to optimize docking performance and computational cost. Docking performance, as evaluated by the percentage of targets where the top pose is better than 2Å root mean square deviation (Top1), is compared to AutoDock Vina scoring when utilizing explicitly defined binding pockets or whole protein docking. Gnina, utilizing a CNN scoring function to rescore the output poses, outperforms AutoDock Vina scoring on redocking and cross-docking tasks when the binding pocket is defined (Top1 increases from 58% to 73% and from 27% to 37%, respectively) and when the whole protein defines the binding pocket (Top1 increases from 31% to 38% and from 12% to 16%, respectively). The derived ensemble of CNNs generalizes to unseen proteins and ligands and produces scores that correlate well with the root mean square deviation to the known binding pose. We provide the 1.0 version of Gnina under an open source license for use as a molecular docking tool at https://github.com/gnina/gnina. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13321-021-00522-2. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8191141/ /pubmed/34108002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00522-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Software McNutt, Andrew T. Francoeur, Paul Aggarwal, Rishal Masuda, Tomohide Meli, Rocco Ragoza, Matthew Sunseri, Jocelyn Koes, David Ryan GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning |
title | GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning |
title_full | GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning |
title_fullStr | GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning |
title_full_unstemmed | GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning |
title_short | GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning |
title_sort | gnina 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning |
topic | Software |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34108002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00522-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcnuttandrewt gnina10moleculardockingwithdeeplearning AT francoeurpaul gnina10moleculardockingwithdeeplearning AT aggarwalrishal gnina10moleculardockingwithdeeplearning AT masudatomohide gnina10moleculardockingwithdeeplearning AT melirocco gnina10moleculardockingwithdeeplearning AT ragozamatthew gnina10moleculardockingwithdeeplearning AT sunserijocelyn gnina10moleculardockingwithdeeplearning AT koesdavidryan gnina10moleculardockingwithdeeplearning |