Cargando…
Layperson Views about the Design and Evaluation of Decision Aids: A Public Deliberation
PURPOSE: We carried out the first public deliberation to elicit lay input regarding guidelines for the design and evaluation of decision aids, focusing on the example of colorectal (“colon”) cancer screening. METHODS: A random, demographically stratified sample of 28 laypeople convened for 4 days, d...
Autores principales: | Schwartz, Peter H., O’Doherty, Kieran C., Bentley, Colene, Schmidt, Karen K., Burgess, Michael M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33813928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X21998980 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Sharing linked data sets for research: results from a deliberative public engagement event in British Columbia, Canada
por: Teng, Jack, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Layperson's View
por: Autry, Simone
Publicado: (2005) -
Adding epitope compatibility to deceased donor kidney allocation criteria: recommendations from a pan-Canadian online public deliberation
por: Edwards, Louisa, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Determinants of Laypersons’ Trust in Medical Decision Aids: Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Kopka, Marvin, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Sequencing the salmon genome: A deliberative public engagement
por: O'Doherty, Kieran, et al.
Publicado: (2010)