Cargando…

First-phase ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts outcomes in aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND: First-phase ejection fraction (EF1; the ejection fraction measured during active systole up to the time of maximal aortic flow) measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a powerful predictor of outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis. We aimed to assess whether cardiovascular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Haotian, Bing, Rong, Chin, Calvin, Fang, Lingyun, White, Audrey C., Everett, Russell, Spath, Nick, Park, Eunsoo, Chambers, John B., Newby, David E., Chiribiri, Amedeo, Dweck, Marc R., Chowienczyk, Phil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34107986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00756-x
_version_ 1783705831384023040
author Gu, Haotian
Bing, Rong
Chin, Calvin
Fang, Lingyun
White, Audrey C.
Everett, Russell
Spath, Nick
Park, Eunsoo
Chambers, John B.
Newby, David E.
Chiribiri, Amedeo
Dweck, Marc R.
Chowienczyk, Phil
author_facet Gu, Haotian
Bing, Rong
Chin, Calvin
Fang, Lingyun
White, Audrey C.
Everett, Russell
Spath, Nick
Park, Eunsoo
Chambers, John B.
Newby, David E.
Chiribiri, Amedeo
Dweck, Marc R.
Chowienczyk, Phil
author_sort Gu, Haotian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: First-phase ejection fraction (EF1; the ejection fraction measured during active systole up to the time of maximal aortic flow) measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a powerful predictor of outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis. We aimed to assess whether cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) might provide more precise measurements of EF1 than TTE and to examine the correlation of CMR EF1 with measures of fibrosis. METHODS: In 141 patients with at least mild aortic stenosis, we measured CMR EF1 from a short-axis 3D stack and compared its variability with TTE EF1, and its associations with myocardial fibrosis and clinical outcome (aortic valve replacement (AVR) or death). RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer variation of CMR EF1 (standard deviations of differences within and between observers of 2.3% and 2.5% units respectively) was approximately 50% that of TTE EF1. CMR EF1 was strongly predictive of AVR or death. On multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, the hazard ratio for CMR EF1 was 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.89–0.97, p = 0.001) per % change in EF1 and, apart from aortic valve gradient, CMR EF1 was the only imaging or biochemical measure independently predictive of outcome. Indexed extracellular volume was associated with AVR or death, but not after adjusting for EF1. CONCLUSIONS: EF1 is a simple robust marker of early left ventricular impairment that can be precisely measured by CMR and predicts outcome in aortic stenosis. Its measurement by CMR is more reproducible than that by TTE and may facilitate left ventricular structure–function analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8191208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81912082021-06-15 First-phase ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts outcomes in aortic stenosis Gu, Haotian Bing, Rong Chin, Calvin Fang, Lingyun White, Audrey C. Everett, Russell Spath, Nick Park, Eunsoo Chambers, John B. Newby, David E. Chiribiri, Amedeo Dweck, Marc R. Chowienczyk, Phil J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: First-phase ejection fraction (EF1; the ejection fraction measured during active systole up to the time of maximal aortic flow) measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a powerful predictor of outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis. We aimed to assess whether cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) might provide more precise measurements of EF1 than TTE and to examine the correlation of CMR EF1 with measures of fibrosis. METHODS: In 141 patients with at least mild aortic stenosis, we measured CMR EF1 from a short-axis 3D stack and compared its variability with TTE EF1, and its associations with myocardial fibrosis and clinical outcome (aortic valve replacement (AVR) or death). RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer variation of CMR EF1 (standard deviations of differences within and between observers of 2.3% and 2.5% units respectively) was approximately 50% that of TTE EF1. CMR EF1 was strongly predictive of AVR or death. On multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, the hazard ratio for CMR EF1 was 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.89–0.97, p = 0.001) per % change in EF1 and, apart from aortic valve gradient, CMR EF1 was the only imaging or biochemical measure independently predictive of outcome. Indexed extracellular volume was associated with AVR or death, but not after adjusting for EF1. CONCLUSIONS: EF1 is a simple robust marker of early left ventricular impairment that can be precisely measured by CMR and predicts outcome in aortic stenosis. Its measurement by CMR is more reproducible than that by TTE and may facilitate left ventricular structure–function analysis. BioMed Central 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8191208/ /pubmed/34107986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00756-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gu, Haotian
Bing, Rong
Chin, Calvin
Fang, Lingyun
White, Audrey C.
Everett, Russell
Spath, Nick
Park, Eunsoo
Chambers, John B.
Newby, David E.
Chiribiri, Amedeo
Dweck, Marc R.
Chowienczyk, Phil
First-phase ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts outcomes in aortic stenosis
title First-phase ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts outcomes in aortic stenosis
title_full First-phase ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts outcomes in aortic stenosis
title_fullStr First-phase ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts outcomes in aortic stenosis
title_full_unstemmed First-phase ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts outcomes in aortic stenosis
title_short First-phase ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts outcomes in aortic stenosis
title_sort first-phase ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts outcomes in aortic stenosis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34107986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00756-x
work_keys_str_mv AT guhaotian firstphaseejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonancepredictsoutcomesinaorticstenosis
AT bingrong firstphaseejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonancepredictsoutcomesinaorticstenosis
AT chincalvin firstphaseejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonancepredictsoutcomesinaorticstenosis
AT fanglingyun firstphaseejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonancepredictsoutcomesinaorticstenosis
AT whiteaudreyc firstphaseejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonancepredictsoutcomesinaorticstenosis
AT everettrussell firstphaseejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonancepredictsoutcomesinaorticstenosis
AT spathnick firstphaseejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonancepredictsoutcomesinaorticstenosis
AT parkeunsoo firstphaseejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonancepredictsoutcomesinaorticstenosis
AT chambersjohnb firstphaseejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonancepredictsoutcomesinaorticstenosis
AT newbydavide firstphaseejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonancepredictsoutcomesinaorticstenosis
AT chiribiriamedeo firstphaseejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonancepredictsoutcomesinaorticstenosis
AT dweckmarcr firstphaseejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonancepredictsoutcomesinaorticstenosis
AT chowienczykphil firstphaseejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonancepredictsoutcomesinaorticstenosis