Cargando…

Evaluation of psychological resilience and anxiety levels of patients with hyperemesis gravidarum diagnosis and comparison with healthy pregnant women

OBJECTIVE: To compare the psychological resilience and anxiety levels of patients diagnosed with hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) and healthy pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sociodemographic data form and the Resilience scale for Adults (RSA) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) were adm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elmas, Burak, Vatansever, Merve, Civan Kahve, Aybeniz, Salman Özgü, Burçin, Asut, Gonca, Çakmak, Işık Batuhan, Bestel, Ayşegül, Erkaya, Salim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34083634
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.05994
_version_ 1783705855404802048
author Elmas, Burak
Vatansever, Merve
Civan Kahve, Aybeniz
Salman Özgü, Burçin
Asut, Gonca
Çakmak, Işık Batuhan
Bestel, Ayşegül
Erkaya, Salim
author_facet Elmas, Burak
Vatansever, Merve
Civan Kahve, Aybeniz
Salman Özgü, Burçin
Asut, Gonca
Çakmak, Işık Batuhan
Bestel, Ayşegül
Erkaya, Salim
author_sort Elmas, Burak
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the psychological resilience and anxiety levels of patients diagnosed with hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) and healthy pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sociodemographic data form and the Resilience scale for Adults (RSA) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) were administered. The sociodemographic data form was completed by the physician, and the RSA and STAI were completed by the participant. The sample of the study consisted of 60 pregnant women with HG and hospitalized and 97 healthy voluntary pregnant women with similar characteristics to the research group without any pregnancy complications. Data were evaluated using descriptive statistical analyses, the independent samples t-test, the Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson’s correlation analysis. RESULTS: The age range was 18-42 years for HG group and 20-43 years for control group. The average age of the HG group was 28.17±5.96 years and that of the control group was 29.45±5.83 years. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of pregnancy week. Regarding the prevalence of state and trait anxiety between the groups, it was found that 66.7% of the HG group had a high level of trait anxiety and 51.7% had a high level of state anxiety. It was found that 61.9% of the control group had a high level of trait anxiety and 38.1% had a high level of state anxiety. There was no difference between the healthy pregnant group and the HG group in terms of anxiety (p=0.125). It was found that there was a significant difference between the groups in terms of only sub-dimensions of RSA, which were perception of self (U=2385.00, p=0.044) and perception of future (U=2350.50, p=0.030). The perception of self and perception of future scores of the healthy control group were higher. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between the healthy pregnant group and the HG group in terms of anxiety. It was observed that the HG group had a lower perception of self and future. Apart from the usual increase in anxiety levels during pregnancy, HG accompanied by stubborn nausea and vomiting does not create an extra psychological burden, either as a cause or a result.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8191320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81913202021-06-22 Evaluation of psychological resilience and anxiety levels of patients with hyperemesis gravidarum diagnosis and comparison with healthy pregnant women Elmas, Burak Vatansever, Merve Civan Kahve, Aybeniz Salman Özgü, Burçin Asut, Gonca Çakmak, Işık Batuhan Bestel, Ayşegül Erkaya, Salim Turk J Obstet Gynecol Clinical Investigation OBJECTIVE: To compare the psychological resilience and anxiety levels of patients diagnosed with hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) and healthy pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sociodemographic data form and the Resilience scale for Adults (RSA) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) were administered. The sociodemographic data form was completed by the physician, and the RSA and STAI were completed by the participant. The sample of the study consisted of 60 pregnant women with HG and hospitalized and 97 healthy voluntary pregnant women with similar characteristics to the research group without any pregnancy complications. Data were evaluated using descriptive statistical analyses, the independent samples t-test, the Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson’s correlation analysis. RESULTS: The age range was 18-42 years for HG group and 20-43 years for control group. The average age of the HG group was 28.17±5.96 years and that of the control group was 29.45±5.83 years. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of pregnancy week. Regarding the prevalence of state and trait anxiety between the groups, it was found that 66.7% of the HG group had a high level of trait anxiety and 51.7% had a high level of state anxiety. It was found that 61.9% of the control group had a high level of trait anxiety and 38.1% had a high level of state anxiety. There was no difference between the healthy pregnant group and the HG group in terms of anxiety (p=0.125). It was found that there was a significant difference between the groups in terms of only sub-dimensions of RSA, which were perception of self (U=2385.00, p=0.044) and perception of future (U=2350.50, p=0.030). The perception of self and perception of future scores of the healthy control group were higher. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between the healthy pregnant group and the HG group in terms of anxiety. It was observed that the HG group had a lower perception of self and future. Apart from the usual increase in anxiety levels during pregnancy, HG accompanied by stubborn nausea and vomiting does not create an extra psychological burden, either as a cause or a result. Galenos Publishing 2021-06 2021-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8191320/ /pubmed/34083634 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.05994 Text en ©Copyright 2021 by Turkish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology | Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Elmas, Burak
Vatansever, Merve
Civan Kahve, Aybeniz
Salman Özgü, Burçin
Asut, Gonca
Çakmak, Işık Batuhan
Bestel, Ayşegül
Erkaya, Salim
Evaluation of psychological resilience and anxiety levels of patients with hyperemesis gravidarum diagnosis and comparison with healthy pregnant women
title Evaluation of psychological resilience and anxiety levels of patients with hyperemesis gravidarum diagnosis and comparison with healthy pregnant women
title_full Evaluation of psychological resilience and anxiety levels of patients with hyperemesis gravidarum diagnosis and comparison with healthy pregnant women
title_fullStr Evaluation of psychological resilience and anxiety levels of patients with hyperemesis gravidarum diagnosis and comparison with healthy pregnant women
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of psychological resilience and anxiety levels of patients with hyperemesis gravidarum diagnosis and comparison with healthy pregnant women
title_short Evaluation of psychological resilience and anxiety levels of patients with hyperemesis gravidarum diagnosis and comparison with healthy pregnant women
title_sort evaluation of psychological resilience and anxiety levels of patients with hyperemesis gravidarum diagnosis and comparison with healthy pregnant women
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34083634
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.05994
work_keys_str_mv AT elmasburak evaluationofpsychologicalresilienceandanxietylevelsofpatientswithhyperemesisgravidarumdiagnosisandcomparisonwithhealthypregnantwomen
AT vatansevermerve evaluationofpsychologicalresilienceandanxietylevelsofpatientswithhyperemesisgravidarumdiagnosisandcomparisonwithhealthypregnantwomen
AT civankahveaybeniz evaluationofpsychologicalresilienceandanxietylevelsofpatientswithhyperemesisgravidarumdiagnosisandcomparisonwithhealthypregnantwomen
AT salmanozguburcin evaluationofpsychologicalresilienceandanxietylevelsofpatientswithhyperemesisgravidarumdiagnosisandcomparisonwithhealthypregnantwomen
AT asutgonca evaluationofpsychologicalresilienceandanxietylevelsofpatientswithhyperemesisgravidarumdiagnosisandcomparisonwithhealthypregnantwomen
AT cakmakisıkbatuhan evaluationofpsychologicalresilienceandanxietylevelsofpatientswithhyperemesisgravidarumdiagnosisandcomparisonwithhealthypregnantwomen
AT bestelaysegul evaluationofpsychologicalresilienceandanxietylevelsofpatientswithhyperemesisgravidarumdiagnosisandcomparisonwithhealthypregnantwomen
AT erkayasalim evaluationofpsychologicalresilienceandanxietylevelsofpatientswithhyperemesisgravidarumdiagnosisandcomparisonwithhealthypregnantwomen