Cargando…
Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency and types of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with the aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) and to evaluate its association with other ultrasonographic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 11,666 fetal anatomic surveys were performed between March 2...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082522 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.69749 |
_version_ | 1783705856152436736 |
---|---|
author | Behram, Mustafa Süzen Çaypınar, Sema Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil Sezer, Salim Çorbacıoğlu Esmer, Aytul |
author_facet | Behram, Mustafa Süzen Çaypınar, Sema Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil Sezer, Salim Çorbacıoğlu Esmer, Aytul |
author_sort | Behram, Mustafa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency and types of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with the aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) and to evaluate its association with other ultrasonographic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 11,666 fetal anatomic surveys were performed between March 2014 and March 2020. The cases diagnosed as ARSA were examined. Accompanying ultrasound findings and chromosomal abnormalities were collected. RESULTS: ARSA was detected in 140 fetuses (1.2%). The ARSA appeared isolated in 47.1% (66/140) of cases and the remaining 52.9% (74/140) of cases were associated with cardiac or extracardiac malformations and soft markers. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 17.8% (25/140) of all cases. Trisomy 21 was the most common chromosomal anomaly with a prevalence of 11.4% (16/140). The corresponding rate was 3% (2/66) and 18.9% (14/74) for isolated and non-isolated ARSA, respectively. DiGeorge syndrome was detected in 3% (n=2) and Turner syndrome was in 3% (n=2) of the isolated group. ARSA was not an isolated finding in any of the 4 fetuses with trisomy 18. CONCLUSION: Isolated ARSA may be the only antenatal predictor of trisomy 21 or other chromosomal anomalies, including DiGeorge or Turner syndrome. Hence, visualization of the right subclavian artery should be a part of the fetal anatomic survey and genetic analysis should be recommended even in the absence of associated findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8191323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81913232021-06-22 Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma Behram, Mustafa Süzen Çaypınar, Sema Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil Sezer, Salim Çorbacıoğlu Esmer, Aytul Turk J Obstet Gynecol Clinical Investigation OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency and types of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with the aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) and to evaluate its association with other ultrasonographic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 11,666 fetal anatomic surveys were performed between March 2014 and March 2020. The cases diagnosed as ARSA were examined. Accompanying ultrasound findings and chromosomal abnormalities were collected. RESULTS: ARSA was detected in 140 fetuses (1.2%). The ARSA appeared isolated in 47.1% (66/140) of cases and the remaining 52.9% (74/140) of cases were associated with cardiac or extracardiac malformations and soft markers. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 17.8% (25/140) of all cases. Trisomy 21 was the most common chromosomal anomaly with a prevalence of 11.4% (16/140). The corresponding rate was 3% (2/66) and 18.9% (14/74) for isolated and non-isolated ARSA, respectively. DiGeorge syndrome was detected in 3% (n=2) and Turner syndrome was in 3% (n=2) of the isolated group. ARSA was not an isolated finding in any of the 4 fetuses with trisomy 18. CONCLUSION: Isolated ARSA may be the only antenatal predictor of trisomy 21 or other chromosomal anomalies, including DiGeorge or Turner syndrome. Hence, visualization of the right subclavian artery should be a part of the fetal anatomic survey and genetic analysis should be recommended even in the absence of associated findings. Galenos Publishing 2021-06 2021-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8191323/ /pubmed/34082522 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.69749 Text en ©Copyright 2021 by Turkish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology | Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigation Behram, Mustafa Süzen Çaypınar, Sema Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil Sezer, Salim Çorbacıoğlu Esmer, Aytul Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma |
title | Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma |
title_full | Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma |
title_fullStr | Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma |
title_full_unstemmed | Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma |
title_short | Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma |
title_sort | should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? a management dilemma |
topic | Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082522 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.69749 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT behrammustafa shouldisolatedaberrantrightsubclavianarterybeignoredintheantenatalperiodamanagementdilemma AT suzencaypınarsema shouldisolatedaberrantrightsubclavianarterybeignoredintheantenatalperiodamanagementdilemma AT oglaksuleymancemil shouldisolatedaberrantrightsubclavianarterybeignoredintheantenatalperiodamanagementdilemma AT sezersalim shouldisolatedaberrantrightsubclavianarterybeignoredintheantenatalperiodamanagementdilemma AT corbacıogluesmeraytul shouldisolatedaberrantrightsubclavianarterybeignoredintheantenatalperiodamanagementdilemma |