Cargando…

Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency and types of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with the aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) and to evaluate its association with other ultrasonographic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 11,666 fetal anatomic surveys were performed between March 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Behram, Mustafa, Süzen Çaypınar, Sema, Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil, Sezer, Salim, Çorbacıoğlu Esmer, Aytul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082522
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.69749
_version_ 1783705856152436736
author Behram, Mustafa
Süzen Çaypınar, Sema
Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil
Sezer, Salim
Çorbacıoğlu Esmer, Aytul
author_facet Behram, Mustafa
Süzen Çaypınar, Sema
Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil
Sezer, Salim
Çorbacıoğlu Esmer, Aytul
author_sort Behram, Mustafa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency and types of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with the aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) and to evaluate its association with other ultrasonographic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 11,666 fetal anatomic surveys were performed between March 2014 and March 2020. The cases diagnosed as ARSA were examined. Accompanying ultrasound findings and chromosomal abnormalities were collected. RESULTS: ARSA was detected in 140 fetuses (1.2%). The ARSA appeared isolated in 47.1% (66/140) of cases and the remaining 52.9% (74/140) of cases were associated with cardiac or extracardiac malformations and soft markers. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 17.8% (25/140) of all cases. Trisomy 21 was the most common chromosomal anomaly with a prevalence of 11.4% (16/140). The corresponding rate was 3% (2/66) and 18.9% (14/74) for isolated and non-isolated ARSA, respectively. DiGeorge syndrome was detected in 3% (n=2) and Turner syndrome was in 3% (n=2) of the isolated group. ARSA was not an isolated finding in any of the 4 fetuses with trisomy 18. CONCLUSION: Isolated ARSA may be the only antenatal predictor of trisomy 21 or other chromosomal anomalies, including DiGeorge or Turner syndrome. Hence, visualization of the right subclavian artery should be a part of the fetal anatomic survey and genetic analysis should be recommended even in the absence of associated findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8191323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81913232021-06-22 Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma Behram, Mustafa Süzen Çaypınar, Sema Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil Sezer, Salim Çorbacıoğlu Esmer, Aytul Turk J Obstet Gynecol Clinical Investigation OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency and types of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with the aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) and to evaluate its association with other ultrasonographic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 11,666 fetal anatomic surveys were performed between March 2014 and March 2020. The cases diagnosed as ARSA were examined. Accompanying ultrasound findings and chromosomal abnormalities were collected. RESULTS: ARSA was detected in 140 fetuses (1.2%). The ARSA appeared isolated in 47.1% (66/140) of cases and the remaining 52.9% (74/140) of cases were associated with cardiac or extracardiac malformations and soft markers. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 17.8% (25/140) of all cases. Trisomy 21 was the most common chromosomal anomaly with a prevalence of 11.4% (16/140). The corresponding rate was 3% (2/66) and 18.9% (14/74) for isolated and non-isolated ARSA, respectively. DiGeorge syndrome was detected in 3% (n=2) and Turner syndrome was in 3% (n=2) of the isolated group. ARSA was not an isolated finding in any of the 4 fetuses with trisomy 18. CONCLUSION: Isolated ARSA may be the only antenatal predictor of trisomy 21 or other chromosomal anomalies, including DiGeorge or Turner syndrome. Hence, visualization of the right subclavian artery should be a part of the fetal anatomic survey and genetic analysis should be recommended even in the absence of associated findings. Galenos Publishing 2021-06 2021-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8191323/ /pubmed/34082522 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.69749 Text en ©Copyright 2021 by Turkish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology | Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Behram, Mustafa
Süzen Çaypınar, Sema
Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil
Sezer, Salim
Çorbacıoğlu Esmer, Aytul
Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma
title Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma
title_full Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma
title_fullStr Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma
title_full_unstemmed Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma
title_short Should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? A management dilemma
title_sort should isolated aberrant right subclavian artery be ignored in the antenatal period? a management dilemma
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082522
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.69749
work_keys_str_mv AT behrammustafa shouldisolatedaberrantrightsubclavianarterybeignoredintheantenatalperiodamanagementdilemma
AT suzencaypınarsema shouldisolatedaberrantrightsubclavianarterybeignoredintheantenatalperiodamanagementdilemma
AT oglaksuleymancemil shouldisolatedaberrantrightsubclavianarterybeignoredintheantenatalperiodamanagementdilemma
AT sezersalim shouldisolatedaberrantrightsubclavianarterybeignoredintheantenatalperiodamanagementdilemma
AT corbacıogluesmeraytul shouldisolatedaberrantrightsubclavianarterybeignoredintheantenatalperiodamanagementdilemma