Cargando…
Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options?
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the success and complications of medical and surgical modalities used in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical and surgical approaches that have been used to treat cesarean scar pregnancies were evaluated retrospectively, Local, systemic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082520 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.77535 |
_version_ | 1783705856383123456 |
---|---|
author | Yüksel Şimşek, Seda Şimşek, Erhan Alkaş Yağınç, Didem Baran, Şafak Yılmaz Çok, Tayfun Bulgan Kılıçdağ, Esra |
author_facet | Yüksel Şimşek, Seda Şimşek, Erhan Alkaş Yağınç, Didem Baran, Şafak Yılmaz Çok, Tayfun Bulgan Kılıçdağ, Esra |
author_sort | Yüksel Şimşek, Seda |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the success and complications of medical and surgical modalities used in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical and surgical approaches that have been used to treat cesarean scar pregnancies were evaluated retrospectively, Local, systemic, and combined methotrexate treatments were grouped as the medical approach, and dilatation and evacuation, hysteroscopic resection, laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches were grouped as the surgical approach. Fifty-three patients were diagnosed as having cesarean scar pregnancy during the study period, 48 of whom were included in the final analysis. Eighteen patients were treated with medical interventions and 30 patients were treated surgically. RESULTS: The success rate of surgical modalities was 96.6% and the medical treatment success was 33% (p<0.001). The complication rate was higher with medical approaches compared with surgical methods (66% vs 3.3%, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgical intervention seems safer and more successful than medical treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8191324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81913242021-06-22 Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options? Yüksel Şimşek, Seda Şimşek, Erhan Alkaş Yağınç, Didem Baran, Şafak Yılmaz Çok, Tayfun Bulgan Kılıçdağ, Esra Turk J Obstet Gynecol Clinical Investigation OBJECTIVE: To investigate the success and complications of medical and surgical modalities used in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical and surgical approaches that have been used to treat cesarean scar pregnancies were evaluated retrospectively, Local, systemic, and combined methotrexate treatments were grouped as the medical approach, and dilatation and evacuation, hysteroscopic resection, laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches were grouped as the surgical approach. Fifty-three patients were diagnosed as having cesarean scar pregnancy during the study period, 48 of whom were included in the final analysis. Eighteen patients were treated with medical interventions and 30 patients were treated surgically. RESULTS: The success rate of surgical modalities was 96.6% and the medical treatment success was 33% (p<0.001). The complication rate was higher with medical approaches compared with surgical methods (66% vs 3.3%, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgical intervention seems safer and more successful than medical treatment. Galenos Publishing 2021-06 2021-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8191324/ /pubmed/34082520 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.77535 Text en ©Copyright 2021 by Turkish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology | Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigation Yüksel Şimşek, Seda Şimşek, Erhan Alkaş Yağınç, Didem Baran, Şafak Yılmaz Çok, Tayfun Bulgan Kılıçdağ, Esra Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options? |
title | Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options? |
title_full | Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options? |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options? |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options? |
title_short | Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options? |
title_sort | outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: do we have options? |
topic | Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082520 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.77535 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yukselsimsekseda outcomesofcesareanscarpregnancytreatmentdowehaveoptions AT simsekerhan outcomesofcesareanscarpregnancytreatmentdowehaveoptions AT alkasyagıncdidem outcomesofcesareanscarpregnancytreatmentdowehaveoptions AT baransafakyılmaz outcomesofcesareanscarpregnancytreatmentdowehaveoptions AT coktayfun outcomesofcesareanscarpregnancytreatmentdowehaveoptions AT bulgankılıcdagesra outcomesofcesareanscarpregnancytreatmentdowehaveoptions |