Cargando…

Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the success and complications of medical and surgical modalities used in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical and surgical approaches that have been used to treat cesarean scar pregnancies were evaluated retrospectively, Local, systemic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yüksel Şimşek, Seda, Şimşek, Erhan, Alkaş Yağınç, Didem, Baran, Şafak Yılmaz, Çok, Tayfun, Bulgan Kılıçdağ, Esra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082520
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.77535
_version_ 1783705856383123456
author Yüksel Şimşek, Seda
Şimşek, Erhan
Alkaş Yağınç, Didem
Baran, Şafak Yılmaz
Çok, Tayfun
Bulgan Kılıçdağ, Esra
author_facet Yüksel Şimşek, Seda
Şimşek, Erhan
Alkaş Yağınç, Didem
Baran, Şafak Yılmaz
Çok, Tayfun
Bulgan Kılıçdağ, Esra
author_sort Yüksel Şimşek, Seda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the success and complications of medical and surgical modalities used in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical and surgical approaches that have been used to treat cesarean scar pregnancies were evaluated retrospectively, Local, systemic, and combined methotrexate treatments were grouped as the medical approach, and dilatation and evacuation, hysteroscopic resection, laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches were grouped as the surgical approach. Fifty-three patients were diagnosed as having cesarean scar pregnancy during the study period, 48 of whom were included in the final analysis. Eighteen patients were treated with medical interventions and 30 patients were treated surgically. RESULTS: The success rate of surgical modalities was 96.6% and the medical treatment success was 33% (p<0.001). The complication rate was higher with medical approaches compared with surgical methods (66% vs 3.3%, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgical intervention seems safer and more successful than medical treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8191324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81913242021-06-22 Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options? Yüksel Şimşek, Seda Şimşek, Erhan Alkaş Yağınç, Didem Baran, Şafak Yılmaz Çok, Tayfun Bulgan Kılıçdağ, Esra Turk J Obstet Gynecol Clinical Investigation OBJECTIVE: To investigate the success and complications of medical and surgical modalities used in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical and surgical approaches that have been used to treat cesarean scar pregnancies were evaluated retrospectively, Local, systemic, and combined methotrexate treatments were grouped as the medical approach, and dilatation and evacuation, hysteroscopic resection, laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches were grouped as the surgical approach. Fifty-three patients were diagnosed as having cesarean scar pregnancy during the study period, 48 of whom were included in the final analysis. Eighteen patients were treated with medical interventions and 30 patients were treated surgically. RESULTS: The success rate of surgical modalities was 96.6% and the medical treatment success was 33% (p<0.001). The complication rate was higher with medical approaches compared with surgical methods (66% vs 3.3%, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgical intervention seems safer and more successful than medical treatment. Galenos Publishing 2021-06 2021-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8191324/ /pubmed/34082520 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.77535 Text en ©Copyright 2021 by Turkish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology | Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Yüksel Şimşek, Seda
Şimşek, Erhan
Alkaş Yağınç, Didem
Baran, Şafak Yılmaz
Çok, Tayfun
Bulgan Kılıçdağ, Esra
Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options?
title Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options?
title_full Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options?
title_fullStr Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options?
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options?
title_short Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options?
title_sort outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: do we have options?
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082520
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.77535
work_keys_str_mv AT yukselsimsekseda outcomesofcesareanscarpregnancytreatmentdowehaveoptions
AT simsekerhan outcomesofcesareanscarpregnancytreatmentdowehaveoptions
AT alkasyagıncdidem outcomesofcesareanscarpregnancytreatmentdowehaveoptions
AT baransafakyılmaz outcomesofcesareanscarpregnancytreatmentdowehaveoptions
AT coktayfun outcomesofcesareanscarpregnancytreatmentdowehaveoptions
AT bulgankılıcdagesra outcomesofcesareanscarpregnancytreatmentdowehaveoptions