Cargando…

Autoantibody Discovery, Assay Development and Adoption: Death Valley, the Sea of Survival and Beyond

Dating to the discovery of the Lupus Erythematosus (LE) cell in 1948, there has been a dramatic growth in the discovery of unique autoantibodies and their cognate targets, all of which has led to the availability and use of autoantibody testing for a broad spectrum of autoimmune diseases. Most studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fritzler, Marvin J., Choi, May Y., Satoh, Minoru, Mahler, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122443
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.679613
_version_ 1783705872977887232
author Fritzler, Marvin J.
Choi, May Y.
Satoh, Minoru
Mahler, Michael
author_facet Fritzler, Marvin J.
Choi, May Y.
Satoh, Minoru
Mahler, Michael
author_sort Fritzler, Marvin J.
collection PubMed
description Dating to the discovery of the Lupus Erythematosus (LE) cell in 1948, there has been a dramatic growth in the discovery of unique autoantibodies and their cognate targets, all of which has led to the availability and use of autoantibody testing for a broad spectrum of autoimmune diseases. Most studies of the sensitivity, specificity, commutability, and harmonization of autoantibody testing have focused on widely available, commercially developed and agency-certified autoantibody kits. However, this is only a small part of the spectrum of autoantibody tests that are provided through laboratories world-wide. This manuscript will review the wider spectrum of testing by exploring the innovation pathway that begins with autoantibody discovery followed by assessment of clinical relevance, accuracy, validation, and then consideration of regulatory requirements as an approved diagnostic test. Some tests are offered as “Research Use Only (RUO)”, some as “Laboratory Developed Tests (LDT)”, some enter Health Technology Assessment (HTA) pathways, while others are relegated to a “death valley” of autoantibody discovery and become “orphan” autoantibodies. Those that achieve regulatory approval are further threatened by the business world’s “Darwinian Sea of Survival”. As one example of the trappings of autoantibody progression or failure, it is reported that more than 200 different autoantibodies have been described in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a small handful (~10%) of these have achieved regulatory approval and are widely available as commercial diagnostic kits, while a few others may be available as RUO or LDT assays. However, the vast majority (90%) are orphaned and languish in an autoantibody ‘death valley’. This review proposes that it is important to keep an inventory of these “orphan autoantibodies” in ‘death valley’ because, with the increasing availability of multi-analyte arrays and artificial intelligence (MAAI), some can be rescued to achieve a useful role in clinical diagnostic especially in light of patient stratification and precision medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8191456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81914562021-06-11 Autoantibody Discovery, Assay Development and Adoption: Death Valley, the Sea of Survival and Beyond Fritzler, Marvin J. Choi, May Y. Satoh, Minoru Mahler, Michael Front Immunol Immunology Dating to the discovery of the Lupus Erythematosus (LE) cell in 1948, there has been a dramatic growth in the discovery of unique autoantibodies and their cognate targets, all of which has led to the availability and use of autoantibody testing for a broad spectrum of autoimmune diseases. Most studies of the sensitivity, specificity, commutability, and harmonization of autoantibody testing have focused on widely available, commercially developed and agency-certified autoantibody kits. However, this is only a small part of the spectrum of autoantibody tests that are provided through laboratories world-wide. This manuscript will review the wider spectrum of testing by exploring the innovation pathway that begins with autoantibody discovery followed by assessment of clinical relevance, accuracy, validation, and then consideration of regulatory requirements as an approved diagnostic test. Some tests are offered as “Research Use Only (RUO)”, some as “Laboratory Developed Tests (LDT)”, some enter Health Technology Assessment (HTA) pathways, while others are relegated to a “death valley” of autoantibody discovery and become “orphan” autoantibodies. Those that achieve regulatory approval are further threatened by the business world’s “Darwinian Sea of Survival”. As one example of the trappings of autoantibody progression or failure, it is reported that more than 200 different autoantibodies have been described in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a small handful (~10%) of these have achieved regulatory approval and are widely available as commercial diagnostic kits, while a few others may be available as RUO or LDT assays. However, the vast majority (90%) are orphaned and languish in an autoantibody ‘death valley’. This review proposes that it is important to keep an inventory of these “orphan autoantibodies” in ‘death valley’ because, with the increasing availability of multi-analyte arrays and artificial intelligence (MAAI), some can be rescued to achieve a useful role in clinical diagnostic especially in light of patient stratification and precision medicine. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8191456/ /pubmed/34122443 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.679613 Text en Copyright © 2021 Fritzler, Choi, Satoh and Mahler https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Fritzler, Marvin J.
Choi, May Y.
Satoh, Minoru
Mahler, Michael
Autoantibody Discovery, Assay Development and Adoption: Death Valley, the Sea of Survival and Beyond
title Autoantibody Discovery, Assay Development and Adoption: Death Valley, the Sea of Survival and Beyond
title_full Autoantibody Discovery, Assay Development and Adoption: Death Valley, the Sea of Survival and Beyond
title_fullStr Autoantibody Discovery, Assay Development and Adoption: Death Valley, the Sea of Survival and Beyond
title_full_unstemmed Autoantibody Discovery, Assay Development and Adoption: Death Valley, the Sea of Survival and Beyond
title_short Autoantibody Discovery, Assay Development and Adoption: Death Valley, the Sea of Survival and Beyond
title_sort autoantibody discovery, assay development and adoption: death valley, the sea of survival and beyond
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122443
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.679613
work_keys_str_mv AT fritzlermarvinj autoantibodydiscoveryassaydevelopmentandadoptiondeathvalleytheseaofsurvivalandbeyond
AT choimayy autoantibodydiscoveryassaydevelopmentandadoptiondeathvalleytheseaofsurvivalandbeyond
AT satohminoru autoantibodydiscoveryassaydevelopmentandadoptiondeathvalleytheseaofsurvivalandbeyond
AT mahlermichael autoantibodydiscoveryassaydevelopmentandadoptiondeathvalleytheseaofsurvivalandbeyond