Cargando…

Comparison of monensin sodium sources for finishing beef cattle

The objective of this study was to evaluate the ruminal fermentation characteristics of ruminally fistulated beef steers consuming a steam-flaked corn (SFC) or dry-rolled corn (DRC) based diet containing either Rumensin 90 (RUM; Elanco, Greenfield, IN), or Monovet 90 (MV; Huvepharma, Peachtree City,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Husz, Taylor C, Smith, Wyatt N, Lockard, Caleb G, Homolka, Megan N, Anderson, Peter T, Gentry, Wes W, Sugg, Joel D, Casey, Kenneth D, Jennings, Jenny S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34124593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab090
_version_ 1783705877893611520
author Husz, Taylor C
Smith, Wyatt N
Lockard, Caleb G
Homolka, Megan N
Anderson, Peter T
Gentry, Wes W
Sugg, Joel D
Casey, Kenneth D
Jennings, Jenny S
author_facet Husz, Taylor C
Smith, Wyatt N
Lockard, Caleb G
Homolka, Megan N
Anderson, Peter T
Gentry, Wes W
Sugg, Joel D
Casey, Kenneth D
Jennings, Jenny S
author_sort Husz, Taylor C
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the ruminal fermentation characteristics of ruminally fistulated beef steers consuming a steam-flaked corn (SFC) or dry-rolled corn (DRC) based diet containing either Rumensin 90 (RUM; Elanco, Greenfield, IN), or Monovet 90 (MV; Huvepharma, Peachtree City, GA). Six ruminally fistulated steers (657.7 kg ± 72.6) housed individually were used in a 6 × 6 Latin square design with 2 × 3 factorial treatment arrangement. Each of the 6 periods were 15 d with 14 d for diet adaptation and 1 d of rumen fluid collections. Dietary treatments were DRC without monensin sodium (DRC-C), SFC without monensin sodium (SFC-C), DRC with Rumensin 90 (DRC-R), DRC with Monovet 90 (DRC-MV), SFC with Rumensin 90 (SFC-R), and SFC with Monovet 90 (SFC-MV). Rumen contents and fluid were collected through the fistula of each animal at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h on d 15 of each period. Rumen fluid collected at 6 h post-feeding each period was used for in vitro analyses. Steer was the experimental unit and the model included fixed effects of grain processing, additive, and grain processing × additive. Total gas produced was composited from each in vitro bottle into a gas collection bag for the 48-h determination of methane concentration. No differences were detected for DMI (P = 0.81). Ruminal pH did not differ for the control or additive treatments (P = 0.33). However, ruminal pH was lower (P < 0.01) with SFC compared to DRC. There was a significant difference in acetate to propionate ratio for grain type (P = 0.01) and a tendency for additive inclusion (P = 0.06). Additive inclusion reduced methane proportion of total gas compared to control treatments (P ≤ 0.01). Overall, monensin sodium reduced methane concentration though source had no effect on DMI or ruminal pH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8191481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81914812021-06-10 Comparison of monensin sodium sources for finishing beef cattle Husz, Taylor C Smith, Wyatt N Lockard, Caleb G Homolka, Megan N Anderson, Peter T Gentry, Wes W Sugg, Joel D Casey, Kenneth D Jennings, Jenny S Transl Anim Sci Ruminant Nutrition The objective of this study was to evaluate the ruminal fermentation characteristics of ruminally fistulated beef steers consuming a steam-flaked corn (SFC) or dry-rolled corn (DRC) based diet containing either Rumensin 90 (RUM; Elanco, Greenfield, IN), or Monovet 90 (MV; Huvepharma, Peachtree City, GA). Six ruminally fistulated steers (657.7 kg ± 72.6) housed individually were used in a 6 × 6 Latin square design with 2 × 3 factorial treatment arrangement. Each of the 6 periods were 15 d with 14 d for diet adaptation and 1 d of rumen fluid collections. Dietary treatments were DRC without monensin sodium (DRC-C), SFC without monensin sodium (SFC-C), DRC with Rumensin 90 (DRC-R), DRC with Monovet 90 (DRC-MV), SFC with Rumensin 90 (SFC-R), and SFC with Monovet 90 (SFC-MV). Rumen contents and fluid were collected through the fistula of each animal at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h on d 15 of each period. Rumen fluid collected at 6 h post-feeding each period was used for in vitro analyses. Steer was the experimental unit and the model included fixed effects of grain processing, additive, and grain processing × additive. Total gas produced was composited from each in vitro bottle into a gas collection bag for the 48-h determination of methane concentration. No differences were detected for DMI (P = 0.81). Ruminal pH did not differ for the control or additive treatments (P = 0.33). However, ruminal pH was lower (P < 0.01) with SFC compared to DRC. There was a significant difference in acetate to propionate ratio for grain type (P = 0.01) and a tendency for additive inclusion (P = 0.06). Additive inclusion reduced methane proportion of total gas compared to control treatments (P ≤ 0.01). Overall, monensin sodium reduced methane concentration though source had no effect on DMI or ruminal pH. Oxford University Press 2021-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8191481/ /pubmed/34124593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab090 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ruminant Nutrition
Husz, Taylor C
Smith, Wyatt N
Lockard, Caleb G
Homolka, Megan N
Anderson, Peter T
Gentry, Wes W
Sugg, Joel D
Casey, Kenneth D
Jennings, Jenny S
Comparison of monensin sodium sources for finishing beef cattle
title Comparison of monensin sodium sources for finishing beef cattle
title_full Comparison of monensin sodium sources for finishing beef cattle
title_fullStr Comparison of monensin sodium sources for finishing beef cattle
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of monensin sodium sources for finishing beef cattle
title_short Comparison of monensin sodium sources for finishing beef cattle
title_sort comparison of monensin sodium sources for finishing beef cattle
topic Ruminant Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34124593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab090
work_keys_str_mv AT husztaylorc comparisonofmonensinsodiumsourcesforfinishingbeefcattle
AT smithwyattn comparisonofmonensinsodiumsourcesforfinishingbeefcattle
AT lockardcalebg comparisonofmonensinsodiumsourcesforfinishingbeefcattle
AT homolkamegann comparisonofmonensinsodiumsourcesforfinishingbeefcattle
AT andersonpetert comparisonofmonensinsodiumsourcesforfinishingbeefcattle
AT gentrywesw comparisonofmonensinsodiumsourcesforfinishingbeefcattle
AT suggjoeld comparisonofmonensinsodiumsourcesforfinishingbeefcattle
AT caseykennethd comparisonofmonensinsodiumsourcesforfinishingbeefcattle
AT jenningsjennys comparisonofmonensinsodiumsourcesforfinishingbeefcattle