Cargando…

Evaluation of stability and esthetic outcome following rigid fixation of a new sagittal genioplasty technique – A clinical study

BACKGROUND: Routine and popular conventional genioplasty procedure is often curvilinear, requires lower border extension below, and behind the mental foramen, which after advancement has a tendency to produce step deformity, butt contact, hence nonunion, instability, and increased relapse tendencies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ekram, Subia, Arunkumar, K. V., Mowar, Apoorva, Khera, Amit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188396
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_76_20
_version_ 1783705888810336256
author Ekram, Subia
Arunkumar, K. V.
Mowar, Apoorva
Khera, Amit
author_facet Ekram, Subia
Arunkumar, K. V.
Mowar, Apoorva
Khera, Amit
author_sort Ekram, Subia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Routine and popular conventional genioplasty procedure is often curvilinear, requires lower border extension below, and behind the mental foramen, which after advancement has a tendency to produce step deformity, butt contact, hence nonunion, instability, and increased relapse tendencies. The present technique is aimed to study the new sagittal genioplasty technique and its efficacy to overcome the above-mentioned drawbacks of conventional genioplasty. This technique also aids in correcting mild-to-moderate breathing irregularities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10 patients included in this study. The comparative analysis of the displacement of the chin in vertical and horizontal directions following surgery was evaluated by measuring the difference between preoperative, immediate postoperative, 3 and 6 months postoperative on lateral cephalometric radiographs. RESULTS: The study of new sagittal chin advancement results showed an advantage over conventional technique in terms of esthetics outcome (no jowl), easy to perform without damaging the mental nerve, superior healing with less relapse, and better surface area contact. CONCLUSION: In this study, the new technique of sagittal genioplasty overcomes the disadvantages of conventional genioplasty. However, this technique is best suited for patients who require straight or moderately vertical augmentation advancement genioplasty and is not suitable for asymmetry corrections, i.e., centering genioplasty and double sliding genioplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8191550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81915502021-06-28 Evaluation of stability and esthetic outcome following rigid fixation of a new sagittal genioplasty technique – A clinical study Ekram, Subia Arunkumar, K. V. Mowar, Apoorva Khera, Amit Natl J Maxillofac Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Routine and popular conventional genioplasty procedure is often curvilinear, requires lower border extension below, and behind the mental foramen, which after advancement has a tendency to produce step deformity, butt contact, hence nonunion, instability, and increased relapse tendencies. The present technique is aimed to study the new sagittal genioplasty technique and its efficacy to overcome the above-mentioned drawbacks of conventional genioplasty. This technique also aids in correcting mild-to-moderate breathing irregularities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10 patients included in this study. The comparative analysis of the displacement of the chin in vertical and horizontal directions following surgery was evaluated by measuring the difference between preoperative, immediate postoperative, 3 and 6 months postoperative on lateral cephalometric radiographs. RESULTS: The study of new sagittal chin advancement results showed an advantage over conventional technique in terms of esthetics outcome (no jowl), easy to perform without damaging the mental nerve, superior healing with less relapse, and better surface area contact. CONCLUSION: In this study, the new technique of sagittal genioplasty overcomes the disadvantages of conventional genioplasty. However, this technique is best suited for patients who require straight or moderately vertical augmentation advancement genioplasty and is not suitable for asymmetry corrections, i.e., centering genioplasty and double sliding genioplasty. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8191550/ /pubmed/34188396 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_76_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ekram, Subia
Arunkumar, K. V.
Mowar, Apoorva
Khera, Amit
Evaluation of stability and esthetic outcome following rigid fixation of a new sagittal genioplasty technique – A clinical study
title Evaluation of stability and esthetic outcome following rigid fixation of a new sagittal genioplasty technique – A clinical study
title_full Evaluation of stability and esthetic outcome following rigid fixation of a new sagittal genioplasty technique – A clinical study
title_fullStr Evaluation of stability and esthetic outcome following rigid fixation of a new sagittal genioplasty technique – A clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of stability and esthetic outcome following rigid fixation of a new sagittal genioplasty technique – A clinical study
title_short Evaluation of stability and esthetic outcome following rigid fixation of a new sagittal genioplasty technique – A clinical study
title_sort evaluation of stability and esthetic outcome following rigid fixation of a new sagittal genioplasty technique – a clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188396
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_76_20
work_keys_str_mv AT ekramsubia evaluationofstabilityandestheticoutcomefollowingrigidfixationofanewsagittalgenioplastytechniqueaclinicalstudy
AT arunkumarkv evaluationofstabilityandestheticoutcomefollowingrigidfixationofanewsagittalgenioplastytechniqueaclinicalstudy
AT mowarapoorva evaluationofstabilityandestheticoutcomefollowingrigidfixationofanewsagittalgenioplastytechniqueaclinicalstudy
AT kheraamit evaluationofstabilityandestheticoutcomefollowingrigidfixationofanewsagittalgenioplastytechniqueaclinicalstudy