Cargando…

Serial Excision for Treatment of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has become the predominant modality of excision for non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). Patients are referred for MMS under the assumption that it is the most effective procedure for definitive removal of the cancer while also allowing for maximal tissue preservation to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dekker, Paige K., Mishu, Mark D., Youn, Richard, Baker, Stephen B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34123684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003607
_version_ 1783705908522516480
author Dekker, Paige K.
Mishu, Mark D.
Youn, Richard
Baker, Stephen B.
author_facet Dekker, Paige K.
Mishu, Mark D.
Youn, Richard
Baker, Stephen B.
author_sort Dekker, Paige K.
collection PubMed
description Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has become the predominant modality of excision for non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). Patients are referred for MMS under the assumption that it is the most effective procedure for definitive removal of the cancer while also allowing for maximal tissue preservation to achieve optimal cosmesis. The objective of this study was to investigate outcomes of serial excision (SE) as an alternative excision modality for NMSC. METHODS: Patients undergoing SE for basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma by the senior author from 2009 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, lesion characteristics, and excision characteristics were recorded. The primary outcome was the number of excisions required to achieve negative margins. RESULTS: In total, 129 patients with 205 NMSC lesions were retrospectively reviewed. An estimated 69 lesions (33.7%) were located in high risk areas, as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Negative margins were achieved in 191 (93.2%) lesions. In 88.3% of lesions (n = 181/205), negative margins were achieved in 2 or less excisions. 12 lesions (5.9%) were referred for MMS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that SE is an effective modality for definitive removal of NMSC. Recent research reveals that SE is much less expensive than MMS, and therefore places a smaller financial burden on the patient and the healthcare system as a whole. Relative to MMS, SE offers similar if not increased benefits for lower cost. Our findings highlight the need to critically reassess the select indications for MMS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8191689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81916892021-06-11 Serial Excision for Treatment of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer Dekker, Paige K. Mishu, Mark D. Youn, Richard Baker, Stephen B. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Reconstructive Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has become the predominant modality of excision for non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). Patients are referred for MMS under the assumption that it is the most effective procedure for definitive removal of the cancer while also allowing for maximal tissue preservation to achieve optimal cosmesis. The objective of this study was to investigate outcomes of serial excision (SE) as an alternative excision modality for NMSC. METHODS: Patients undergoing SE for basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma by the senior author from 2009 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, lesion characteristics, and excision characteristics were recorded. The primary outcome was the number of excisions required to achieve negative margins. RESULTS: In total, 129 patients with 205 NMSC lesions were retrospectively reviewed. An estimated 69 lesions (33.7%) were located in high risk areas, as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Negative margins were achieved in 191 (93.2%) lesions. In 88.3% of lesions (n = 181/205), negative margins were achieved in 2 or less excisions. 12 lesions (5.9%) were referred for MMS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that SE is an effective modality for definitive removal of NMSC. Recent research reveals that SE is much less expensive than MMS, and therefore places a smaller financial burden on the patient and the healthcare system as a whole. Relative to MMS, SE offers similar if not increased benefits for lower cost. Our findings highlight the need to critically reassess the select indications for MMS. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8191689/ /pubmed/34123684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003607 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Reconstructive
Dekker, Paige K.
Mishu, Mark D.
Youn, Richard
Baker, Stephen B.
Serial Excision for Treatment of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer
title Serial Excision for Treatment of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer
title_full Serial Excision for Treatment of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer
title_fullStr Serial Excision for Treatment of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Serial Excision for Treatment of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer
title_short Serial Excision for Treatment of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer
title_sort serial excision for treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer
topic Reconstructive
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34123684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003607
work_keys_str_mv AT dekkerpaigek serialexcisionfortreatmentofnonmelanomaskincancer
AT mishumarkd serialexcisionfortreatmentofnonmelanomaskincancer
AT younrichard serialexcisionfortreatmentofnonmelanomaskincancer
AT bakerstephenb serialexcisionfortreatmentofnonmelanomaskincancer