Cargando…

Selection of Artificial Dermis for Shortening Treatment Period: Integra versus Pelnac

Skin reconstruction of full-thickness skin defect wounds using artificial dermis is performed using secondary split-thickness skin grafting. For the selection of artificial dermis to shorten the treatment period, the waiting time until secondary skin grafting was investigated when the dermis-like ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kashimura, Tsutomu, Nagasaki, Keito, Horigome, Michio, Yoshida, Kotoku, Soejima, Kazutaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34123683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003599
_version_ 1783705910714040320
author Kashimura, Tsutomu
Nagasaki, Keito
Horigome, Michio
Yoshida, Kotoku
Soejima, Kazutaka
author_facet Kashimura, Tsutomu
Nagasaki, Keito
Horigome, Michio
Yoshida, Kotoku
Soejima, Kazutaka
author_sort Kashimura, Tsutomu
collection PubMed
description Skin reconstruction of full-thickness skin defect wounds using artificial dermis is performed using secondary split-thickness skin grafting. For the selection of artificial dermis to shorten the treatment period, the waiting time until secondary skin grafting was investigated when the dermis-like tissue was constructed with Pelnac or Integra. METHODS: We evaluated 26 patients who underwent secondary skin grafting after dermis reconstruction with Pelnac (18 patients) or Integra (8 patients) for full-thickness skin defects between 2006 and 2017. The waiting period from artificial dermis application to closure of the full-thickness skin defect with a secondary skin graft was investigated retrospectively. RESULTS: Skin grafts survived well in all cases, and no complications of grafts or donors were observed. The mean waiting period was 17.5 ± 4.2 and 22.0 ± 4.6 days for the Pelnac and Integra groups, respectively (significantly shorter in the Pelnac group). CONCLUSIONS: The difference in waiting period is presumed to be due to the structural differences between the collagen sponge layer, which is the dermal replacement layer of Pelnac and Integra grafts. In cases where shortening the treatment period is important, Pelnac should be the first choice. In addition, in pediatric cases and widespread burns where it is difficult to control the infection during the waiting period, Pelnac is considered to be the first choice because the risk can be reduced by shortening the waiting period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8191699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81916992021-06-11 Selection of Artificial Dermis for Shortening Treatment Period: Integra versus Pelnac Kashimura, Tsutomu Nagasaki, Keito Horigome, Michio Yoshida, Kotoku Soejima, Kazutaka Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Reconstructive Skin reconstruction of full-thickness skin defect wounds using artificial dermis is performed using secondary split-thickness skin grafting. For the selection of artificial dermis to shorten the treatment period, the waiting time until secondary skin grafting was investigated when the dermis-like tissue was constructed with Pelnac or Integra. METHODS: We evaluated 26 patients who underwent secondary skin grafting after dermis reconstruction with Pelnac (18 patients) or Integra (8 patients) for full-thickness skin defects between 2006 and 2017. The waiting period from artificial dermis application to closure of the full-thickness skin defect with a secondary skin graft was investigated retrospectively. RESULTS: Skin grafts survived well in all cases, and no complications of grafts or donors were observed. The mean waiting period was 17.5 ± 4.2 and 22.0 ± 4.6 days for the Pelnac and Integra groups, respectively (significantly shorter in the Pelnac group). CONCLUSIONS: The difference in waiting period is presumed to be due to the structural differences between the collagen sponge layer, which is the dermal replacement layer of Pelnac and Integra grafts. In cases where shortening the treatment period is important, Pelnac should be the first choice. In addition, in pediatric cases and widespread burns where it is difficult to control the infection during the waiting period, Pelnac is considered to be the first choice because the risk can be reduced by shortening the waiting period. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8191699/ /pubmed/34123683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003599 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Reconstructive
Kashimura, Tsutomu
Nagasaki, Keito
Horigome, Michio
Yoshida, Kotoku
Soejima, Kazutaka
Selection of Artificial Dermis for Shortening Treatment Period: Integra versus Pelnac
title Selection of Artificial Dermis for Shortening Treatment Period: Integra versus Pelnac
title_full Selection of Artificial Dermis for Shortening Treatment Period: Integra versus Pelnac
title_fullStr Selection of Artificial Dermis for Shortening Treatment Period: Integra versus Pelnac
title_full_unstemmed Selection of Artificial Dermis for Shortening Treatment Period: Integra versus Pelnac
title_short Selection of Artificial Dermis for Shortening Treatment Period: Integra versus Pelnac
title_sort selection of artificial dermis for shortening treatment period: integra versus pelnac
topic Reconstructive
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34123683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003599
work_keys_str_mv AT kashimuratsutomu selectionofartificialdermisforshorteningtreatmentperiodintegraversuspelnac
AT nagasakikeito selectionofartificialdermisforshorteningtreatmentperiodintegraversuspelnac
AT horigomemichio selectionofartificialdermisforshorteningtreatmentperiodintegraversuspelnac
AT yoshidakotoku selectionofartificialdermisforshorteningtreatmentperiodintegraversuspelnac
AT soejimakazutaka selectionofartificialdermisforshorteningtreatmentperiodintegraversuspelnac