Cargando…
No benefit for elbow blocking on conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: A 6-month randomized controlled trial
PURPOSE: For displaced distal radius fracture, this trial aimed to compare an above-elbow (AE) and below-elbow (BE) cast at the end of a 24-week follow-up using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire as a primary outcome. METHODS: This is a clinical trial with parallel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34111160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252667 |
_version_ | 1783705956620697600 |
---|---|
author | Okamura, Aldo de Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe Neto, Jorge Raduan Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Faloppa, Flavio Belloti, João Carlos |
author_facet | Okamura, Aldo de Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe Neto, Jorge Raduan Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Faloppa, Flavio Belloti, João Carlos |
author_sort | Okamura, Aldo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: For displaced distal radius fracture, this trial aimed to compare an above-elbow (AE) and below-elbow (BE) cast at the end of a 24-week follow-up using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire as a primary outcome. METHODS: This is a clinical trial with parallel groups (1:1) and a blinded evaluator. There are two non-surgical interventions: AE and BE. A total of 128 adult patients with acute (up to 7 days) displaced distal radius fracture of type A2-3, C1-3 by the AO classification were included. The follow-up was 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the DASH questionnaire at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were the maintenance of reduction by the evaluation of radiographic parameters, pain measured by VAS, PRWE, objective functional evaluation and rate of adverse effects. RESULTS: The difference between the two groups in the DASH score at 24 weeks was not significant, with the mean (95% CI) DASH score being AE: 9.44 (2.70 to 16.17) vs. BE: 9.88 (3.19 to 16.57) (p = 0.895). The above-elbow group had a significantly greater worsening of the mean DASH score from baseline to 2 weeks (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups in any of the other follow-up assessments. Objective functional evaluation, PRWE, radiographical measures and rates of reduction loss were similar between groups. Above-elbow casting resulted in more adverse effects (mostly shoulder pain; 19 events vs. 9 events); RR = 0.39 (0.19–0.94); p = 0.033 at the end of six-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not demonstrate a difference between above-elbow and below-elbow cast in terms of DASH outcome at 6 months in non-surgical treatment of deviated distal radius fractures. However, below-elbow casting is less debilitating during the treatment period, has comparable performance in maintaining the reduction, and is related to fewer minor adverse effects than above-elbow casting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8191961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81919612021-06-10 No benefit for elbow blocking on conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: A 6-month randomized controlled trial Okamura, Aldo de Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe Neto, Jorge Raduan Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Faloppa, Flavio Belloti, João Carlos PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: For displaced distal radius fracture, this trial aimed to compare an above-elbow (AE) and below-elbow (BE) cast at the end of a 24-week follow-up using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire as a primary outcome. METHODS: This is a clinical trial with parallel groups (1:1) and a blinded evaluator. There are two non-surgical interventions: AE and BE. A total of 128 adult patients with acute (up to 7 days) displaced distal radius fracture of type A2-3, C1-3 by the AO classification were included. The follow-up was 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the DASH questionnaire at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were the maintenance of reduction by the evaluation of radiographic parameters, pain measured by VAS, PRWE, objective functional evaluation and rate of adverse effects. RESULTS: The difference between the two groups in the DASH score at 24 weeks was not significant, with the mean (95% CI) DASH score being AE: 9.44 (2.70 to 16.17) vs. BE: 9.88 (3.19 to 16.57) (p = 0.895). The above-elbow group had a significantly greater worsening of the mean DASH score from baseline to 2 weeks (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups in any of the other follow-up assessments. Objective functional evaluation, PRWE, radiographical measures and rates of reduction loss were similar between groups. Above-elbow casting resulted in more adverse effects (mostly shoulder pain; 19 events vs. 9 events); RR = 0.39 (0.19–0.94); p = 0.033 at the end of six-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not demonstrate a difference between above-elbow and below-elbow cast in terms of DASH outcome at 6 months in non-surgical treatment of deviated distal radius fractures. However, below-elbow casting is less debilitating during the treatment period, has comparable performance in maintaining the reduction, and is related to fewer minor adverse effects than above-elbow casting. Public Library of Science 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8191961/ /pubmed/34111160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252667 Text en © 2021 Okamura et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Okamura, Aldo de Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe Neto, Jorge Raduan Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Faloppa, Flavio Belloti, João Carlos No benefit for elbow blocking on conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: A 6-month randomized controlled trial |
title | No benefit for elbow blocking on conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: A 6-month randomized controlled trial |
title_full | No benefit for elbow blocking on conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: A 6-month randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | No benefit for elbow blocking on conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: A 6-month randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | No benefit for elbow blocking on conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: A 6-month randomized controlled trial |
title_short | No benefit for elbow blocking on conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: A 6-month randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | no benefit for elbow blocking on conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: a 6-month randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34111160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252667 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okamuraaldo nobenefitforelbowblockingonconservativetreatmentofdistalradiusfracturesa6monthrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT demoraesviniciusynoe nobenefitforelbowblockingonconservativetreatmentofdistalradiusfracturesa6monthrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT netojorgeraduan nobenefitforelbowblockingonconservativetreatmentofdistalradiusfracturesa6monthrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tamaokimarceljun nobenefitforelbowblockingonconservativetreatmentofdistalradiusfracturesa6monthrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT faloppaflavio nobenefitforelbowblockingonconservativetreatmentofdistalradiusfracturesa6monthrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bellotijoaocarlos nobenefitforelbowblockingonconservativetreatmentofdistalradiusfracturesa6monthrandomizedcontrolledtrial |