Cargando…

Echocardiographic view and feature selection for the estimation of the response to CRT

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an implant-based therapy applied to patients with a specific heart failure (HF) profile. The identification of patients that may benefit from CRT is a challenging task and the application of current guidelines still induce a non-responder rate of about 30%....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gallard, Alban, Galli, Elena, Hubert, Arnaud, Bidaut, Auriane, Le Rolle, Virginie, Smiseth, Otto, Voigt, Jens-Uwe, Donal, Erwan, Hernández, Alfredo I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34111154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252857
_version_ 1783705956854530048
author Gallard, Alban
Galli, Elena
Hubert, Arnaud
Bidaut, Auriane
Le Rolle, Virginie
Smiseth, Otto
Voigt, Jens-Uwe
Donal, Erwan
Hernández, Alfredo I.
author_facet Gallard, Alban
Galli, Elena
Hubert, Arnaud
Bidaut, Auriane
Le Rolle, Virginie
Smiseth, Otto
Voigt, Jens-Uwe
Donal, Erwan
Hernández, Alfredo I.
author_sort Gallard, Alban
collection PubMed
description Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an implant-based therapy applied to patients with a specific heart failure (HF) profile. The identification of patients that may benefit from CRT is a challenging task and the application of current guidelines still induce a non-responder rate of about 30%. Several studies have shown that the assessment of left ventricular (LV) mechanics by speckle tracking echocardiography can provide useful information for CRT patient selection. A comprehensive evaluation of LV mechanics is normally performed using three different echocardioraphic views: 4, 3 or 2-chamber views. The aim of this study is to estimate the relative importance of strain-based features extracted from these three views, for the estimation of CRT response. Several features were extracted from the longitudinal strain curves of 130 patients and different methods of feature selection (out-of-bag random forest, wrapping and filtering) have been applied. Results show that more than 50% of the 20 most important features are calculated from the 4-chamber view. Although features from the 2- and 3-chamber views are less represented in the most important features, some of the former have been identified to provide complementary information. A thorough analysis and interpretation of the most informative features is also provided, as a first step towards the construction of a machine-learning chain for an improved selection of CRT candidates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8191962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81919622021-06-10 Echocardiographic view and feature selection for the estimation of the response to CRT Gallard, Alban Galli, Elena Hubert, Arnaud Bidaut, Auriane Le Rolle, Virginie Smiseth, Otto Voigt, Jens-Uwe Donal, Erwan Hernández, Alfredo I. PLoS One Research Article Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an implant-based therapy applied to patients with a specific heart failure (HF) profile. The identification of patients that may benefit from CRT is a challenging task and the application of current guidelines still induce a non-responder rate of about 30%. Several studies have shown that the assessment of left ventricular (LV) mechanics by speckle tracking echocardiography can provide useful information for CRT patient selection. A comprehensive evaluation of LV mechanics is normally performed using three different echocardioraphic views: 4, 3 or 2-chamber views. The aim of this study is to estimate the relative importance of strain-based features extracted from these three views, for the estimation of CRT response. Several features were extracted from the longitudinal strain curves of 130 patients and different methods of feature selection (out-of-bag random forest, wrapping and filtering) have been applied. Results show that more than 50% of the 20 most important features are calculated from the 4-chamber view. Although features from the 2- and 3-chamber views are less represented in the most important features, some of the former have been identified to provide complementary information. A thorough analysis and interpretation of the most informative features is also provided, as a first step towards the construction of a machine-learning chain for an improved selection of CRT candidates. Public Library of Science 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8191962/ /pubmed/34111154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252857 Text en © 2021 Gallard et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gallard, Alban
Galli, Elena
Hubert, Arnaud
Bidaut, Auriane
Le Rolle, Virginie
Smiseth, Otto
Voigt, Jens-Uwe
Donal, Erwan
Hernández, Alfredo I.
Echocardiographic view and feature selection for the estimation of the response to CRT
title Echocardiographic view and feature selection for the estimation of the response to CRT
title_full Echocardiographic view and feature selection for the estimation of the response to CRT
title_fullStr Echocardiographic view and feature selection for the estimation of the response to CRT
title_full_unstemmed Echocardiographic view and feature selection for the estimation of the response to CRT
title_short Echocardiographic view and feature selection for the estimation of the response to CRT
title_sort echocardiographic view and feature selection for the estimation of the response to crt
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34111154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252857
work_keys_str_mv AT gallardalban echocardiographicviewandfeatureselectionfortheestimationoftheresponsetocrt
AT gallielena echocardiographicviewandfeatureselectionfortheestimationoftheresponsetocrt
AT hubertarnaud echocardiographicviewandfeatureselectionfortheestimationoftheresponsetocrt
AT bidautauriane echocardiographicviewandfeatureselectionfortheestimationoftheresponsetocrt
AT lerollevirginie echocardiographicviewandfeatureselectionfortheestimationoftheresponsetocrt
AT smisethotto echocardiographicviewandfeatureselectionfortheestimationoftheresponsetocrt
AT voigtjensuwe echocardiographicviewandfeatureselectionfortheestimationoftheresponsetocrt
AT donalerwan echocardiographicviewandfeatureselectionfortheestimationoftheresponsetocrt
AT hernandezalfredoi echocardiographicviewandfeatureselectionfortheestimationoftheresponsetocrt