Cargando…

Ponseti Casting vs. Soft Tissue Release for the Initial Treatment of Non-idiopathic Clubfoot

Purpose: Ponseti casting has universally been accepted as the gold standard for treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. Conversely, primary treatment for non-idiopathic clubfoot has not been established. The purpose of this study is to compare treatment outcomes following primary soft tissue release (STR)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abraham, Jonathan, Wall, Jon Cooper, Diab, Michel, Beaver, Cody
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8192715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34124137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.668334
_version_ 1783706093491322880
author Abraham, Jonathan
Wall, Jon Cooper
Diab, Michel
Beaver, Cody
author_facet Abraham, Jonathan
Wall, Jon Cooper
Diab, Michel
Beaver, Cody
author_sort Abraham, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Ponseti casting has universally been accepted as the gold standard for treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. Conversely, primary treatment for non-idiopathic clubfoot has not been established. The purpose of this study is to compare treatment outcomes following primary soft tissue release (STR) and Ponseti casting of non-idiopathic clubfoot. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective study of patients treated for non-idiopathic clubfoot between 2005 and 2020 was conducted. Patients were included if they began treatment before the age of 2 and had at least 1 year of follow up. Patients were placed into either the STR group or Ponseti group and variables of interest were documented including reoccurrence of deformity, number of surgeries performed, type of surgeries performed, anesthesia time, and surgery time. Data was analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Results: A total of 33 children with 57 neuromuscular/syndromic clubfoot were identified of which 9 (15 feet) were treated with STR and 24 (42 feet) were treated with Ponseti casting. Average anesthesia and surgery time were found to be 291 and 179 min, respectively, for the STR group, and 113 and 67 min for the Ponseti group. The difference in operating time was determined to be significant (p = 0.02, p = 0.01). Patients treated with STR were found to have significantly more surgeries performed over the course of treatment than those treated with Ponseti casting (p = 0.001) with an average of 4.2 surgeries in the STR group and 1.5 surgeries in the Ponseti group. Extracapsular procedures were performed in 100% of the STR group and 97.6% of the Ponseti group (p = 0.55). Intracapsular procedures were performed in 100% of the STR group and 50% of the Ponseti group (p = 0.001). Conclusion: The Ponseti method should serve as the primary approach in the initial treatment of non-idiopathic clubfoot as it can reduce the risk of future invasive intracapsular surgery and shorten anesthesia and surgery times when surgical treatment is necessary. Level of Evidence: Level III retrospective case control study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8192715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81927152021-06-12 Ponseti Casting vs. Soft Tissue Release for the Initial Treatment of Non-idiopathic Clubfoot Abraham, Jonathan Wall, Jon Cooper Diab, Michel Beaver, Cody Front Surg Surgery Purpose: Ponseti casting has universally been accepted as the gold standard for treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. Conversely, primary treatment for non-idiopathic clubfoot has not been established. The purpose of this study is to compare treatment outcomes following primary soft tissue release (STR) and Ponseti casting of non-idiopathic clubfoot. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective study of patients treated for non-idiopathic clubfoot between 2005 and 2020 was conducted. Patients were included if they began treatment before the age of 2 and had at least 1 year of follow up. Patients were placed into either the STR group or Ponseti group and variables of interest were documented including reoccurrence of deformity, number of surgeries performed, type of surgeries performed, anesthesia time, and surgery time. Data was analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Results: A total of 33 children with 57 neuromuscular/syndromic clubfoot were identified of which 9 (15 feet) were treated with STR and 24 (42 feet) were treated with Ponseti casting. Average anesthesia and surgery time were found to be 291 and 179 min, respectively, for the STR group, and 113 and 67 min for the Ponseti group. The difference in operating time was determined to be significant (p = 0.02, p = 0.01). Patients treated with STR were found to have significantly more surgeries performed over the course of treatment than those treated with Ponseti casting (p = 0.001) with an average of 4.2 surgeries in the STR group and 1.5 surgeries in the Ponseti group. Extracapsular procedures were performed in 100% of the STR group and 97.6% of the Ponseti group (p = 0.55). Intracapsular procedures were performed in 100% of the STR group and 50% of the Ponseti group (p = 0.001). Conclusion: The Ponseti method should serve as the primary approach in the initial treatment of non-idiopathic clubfoot as it can reduce the risk of future invasive intracapsular surgery and shorten anesthesia and surgery times when surgical treatment is necessary. Level of Evidence: Level III retrospective case control study. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8192715/ /pubmed/34124137 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.668334 Text en Copyright © 2021 Abraham, Wall, Diab and Beaver. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Abraham, Jonathan
Wall, Jon Cooper
Diab, Michel
Beaver, Cody
Ponseti Casting vs. Soft Tissue Release for the Initial Treatment of Non-idiopathic Clubfoot
title Ponseti Casting vs. Soft Tissue Release for the Initial Treatment of Non-idiopathic Clubfoot
title_full Ponseti Casting vs. Soft Tissue Release for the Initial Treatment of Non-idiopathic Clubfoot
title_fullStr Ponseti Casting vs. Soft Tissue Release for the Initial Treatment of Non-idiopathic Clubfoot
title_full_unstemmed Ponseti Casting vs. Soft Tissue Release for the Initial Treatment of Non-idiopathic Clubfoot
title_short Ponseti Casting vs. Soft Tissue Release for the Initial Treatment of Non-idiopathic Clubfoot
title_sort ponseti casting vs. soft tissue release for the initial treatment of non-idiopathic clubfoot
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8192715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34124137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.668334
work_keys_str_mv AT abrahamjonathan ponseticastingvssofttissuereleasefortheinitialtreatmentofnonidiopathicclubfoot
AT walljoncooper ponseticastingvssofttissuereleasefortheinitialtreatmentofnonidiopathicclubfoot
AT diabmichel ponseticastingvssofttissuereleasefortheinitialtreatmentofnonidiopathicclubfoot
AT beavercody ponseticastingvssofttissuereleasefortheinitialtreatmentofnonidiopathicclubfoot