Cargando…
Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials
Recent advances in 3D printing have led to a rise in the use of 3D printed materials in prosthetics and external medical devices. These devices, while inexpensive, have not been adequately studied for their ability to resist biofouling and biofilm buildup. Bacterial biofilms are a major cause of bio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8192718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.646303 |
_version_ | 1783706094253637632 |
---|---|
author | Hall, Donald C. Palmer, Phillip Ji, Hai-Feng Ehrlich, Garth D. Król, Jarosław E. |
author_facet | Hall, Donald C. Palmer, Phillip Ji, Hai-Feng Ehrlich, Garth D. Król, Jarosław E. |
author_sort | Hall, Donald C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent advances in 3D printing have led to a rise in the use of 3D printed materials in prosthetics and external medical devices. These devices, while inexpensive, have not been adequately studied for their ability to resist biofouling and biofilm buildup. Bacterial biofilms are a major cause of biofouling in the medical field and, therefore, hospital-acquired, and medical device infections. These surface-attached bacteria are highly recalcitrant to conventional antimicrobial agents and result in chronic infections. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and medical officials have considered 3D printed medical devices as alternatives to conventional devices, due to manufacturing shortages. This abundant use of 3D printed devices in the medical fields warrants studies to assess the ability of different microorganisms to attach and colonize to such surfaces. In this study, we describe methods to determine bacterial biofouling and biofilm formation on 3D printed materials. We explored the biofilm-forming ability of multiple opportunistic pathogens commonly found on the human body including Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus to colonize eight commonly used polylactic acid (PLA) polymers. Biofilm quantification, surface topography, digital optical microscopy, and 3D projections were employed to better understand the bacterial attachment to 3D printed surfaces. We found that biofilm formation depends on surface structure, hydrophobicity, and that there was a wide range of antimicrobial properties among the tested polymers. We compared our tested materials with commercially available antimicrobial PLA polymers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8192718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81927182021-06-12 Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials Hall, Donald C. Palmer, Phillip Ji, Hai-Feng Ehrlich, Garth D. Król, Jarosław E. Front Microbiol Microbiology Recent advances in 3D printing have led to a rise in the use of 3D printed materials in prosthetics and external medical devices. These devices, while inexpensive, have not been adequately studied for their ability to resist biofouling and biofilm buildup. Bacterial biofilms are a major cause of biofouling in the medical field and, therefore, hospital-acquired, and medical device infections. These surface-attached bacteria are highly recalcitrant to conventional antimicrobial agents and result in chronic infections. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and medical officials have considered 3D printed medical devices as alternatives to conventional devices, due to manufacturing shortages. This abundant use of 3D printed devices in the medical fields warrants studies to assess the ability of different microorganisms to attach and colonize to such surfaces. In this study, we describe methods to determine bacterial biofouling and biofilm formation on 3D printed materials. We explored the biofilm-forming ability of multiple opportunistic pathogens commonly found on the human body including Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus to colonize eight commonly used polylactic acid (PLA) polymers. Biofilm quantification, surface topography, digital optical microscopy, and 3D projections were employed to better understand the bacterial attachment to 3D printed surfaces. We found that biofilm formation depends on surface structure, hydrophobicity, and that there was a wide range of antimicrobial properties among the tested polymers. We compared our tested materials with commercially available antimicrobial PLA polymers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8192718/ /pubmed/34122361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.646303 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hall, Palmer, Ji, Ehrlich and Król. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Hall, Donald C. Palmer, Phillip Ji, Hai-Feng Ehrlich, Garth D. Król, Jarosław E. Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials |
title | Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials |
title_full | Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials |
title_fullStr | Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials |
title_full_unstemmed | Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials |
title_short | Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials |
title_sort | bacterial biofilm growth on 3d-printed materials |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8192718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.646303 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halldonaldc bacterialbiofilmgrowthon3dprintedmaterials AT palmerphillip bacterialbiofilmgrowthon3dprintedmaterials AT jihaifeng bacterialbiofilmgrowthon3dprintedmaterials AT ehrlichgarthd bacterialbiofilmgrowthon3dprintedmaterials AT kroljarosławe bacterialbiofilmgrowthon3dprintedmaterials |