Cargando…

Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials

Recent advances in 3D printing have led to a rise in the use of 3D printed materials in prosthetics and external medical devices. These devices, while inexpensive, have not been adequately studied for their ability to resist biofouling and biofilm buildup. Bacterial biofilms are a major cause of bio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hall, Donald C., Palmer, Phillip, Ji, Hai-Feng, Ehrlich, Garth D., Król, Jarosław E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8192718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.646303
_version_ 1783706094253637632
author Hall, Donald C.
Palmer, Phillip
Ji, Hai-Feng
Ehrlich, Garth D.
Król, Jarosław E.
author_facet Hall, Donald C.
Palmer, Phillip
Ji, Hai-Feng
Ehrlich, Garth D.
Król, Jarosław E.
author_sort Hall, Donald C.
collection PubMed
description Recent advances in 3D printing have led to a rise in the use of 3D printed materials in prosthetics and external medical devices. These devices, while inexpensive, have not been adequately studied for their ability to resist biofouling and biofilm buildup. Bacterial biofilms are a major cause of biofouling in the medical field and, therefore, hospital-acquired, and medical device infections. These surface-attached bacteria are highly recalcitrant to conventional antimicrobial agents and result in chronic infections. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and medical officials have considered 3D printed medical devices as alternatives to conventional devices, due to manufacturing shortages. This abundant use of 3D printed devices in the medical fields warrants studies to assess the ability of different microorganisms to attach and colonize to such surfaces. In this study, we describe methods to determine bacterial biofouling and biofilm formation on 3D printed materials. We explored the biofilm-forming ability of multiple opportunistic pathogens commonly found on the human body including Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus to colonize eight commonly used polylactic acid (PLA) polymers. Biofilm quantification, surface topography, digital optical microscopy, and 3D projections were employed to better understand the bacterial attachment to 3D printed surfaces. We found that biofilm formation depends on surface structure, hydrophobicity, and that there was a wide range of antimicrobial properties among the tested polymers. We compared our tested materials with commercially available antimicrobial PLA polymers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8192718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81927182021-06-12 Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials Hall, Donald C. Palmer, Phillip Ji, Hai-Feng Ehrlich, Garth D. Król, Jarosław E. Front Microbiol Microbiology Recent advances in 3D printing have led to a rise in the use of 3D printed materials in prosthetics and external medical devices. These devices, while inexpensive, have not been adequately studied for their ability to resist biofouling and biofilm buildup. Bacterial biofilms are a major cause of biofouling in the medical field and, therefore, hospital-acquired, and medical device infections. These surface-attached bacteria are highly recalcitrant to conventional antimicrobial agents and result in chronic infections. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and medical officials have considered 3D printed medical devices as alternatives to conventional devices, due to manufacturing shortages. This abundant use of 3D printed devices in the medical fields warrants studies to assess the ability of different microorganisms to attach and colonize to such surfaces. In this study, we describe methods to determine bacterial biofouling and biofilm formation on 3D printed materials. We explored the biofilm-forming ability of multiple opportunistic pathogens commonly found on the human body including Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus to colonize eight commonly used polylactic acid (PLA) polymers. Biofilm quantification, surface topography, digital optical microscopy, and 3D projections were employed to better understand the bacterial attachment to 3D printed surfaces. We found that biofilm formation depends on surface structure, hydrophobicity, and that there was a wide range of antimicrobial properties among the tested polymers. We compared our tested materials with commercially available antimicrobial PLA polymers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8192718/ /pubmed/34122361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.646303 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hall, Palmer, Ji, Ehrlich and Król. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Hall, Donald C.
Palmer, Phillip
Ji, Hai-Feng
Ehrlich, Garth D.
Król, Jarosław E.
Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials
title Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials
title_full Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials
title_fullStr Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials
title_short Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials
title_sort bacterial biofilm growth on 3d-printed materials
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8192718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.646303
work_keys_str_mv AT halldonaldc bacterialbiofilmgrowthon3dprintedmaterials
AT palmerphillip bacterialbiofilmgrowthon3dprintedmaterials
AT jihaifeng bacterialbiofilmgrowthon3dprintedmaterials
AT ehrlichgarthd bacterialbiofilmgrowthon3dprintedmaterials
AT kroljarosławe bacterialbiofilmgrowthon3dprintedmaterials