Cargando…

Social Network Research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention

There is growing interest in social network-based programmes to improve health, but rigorous methods using Social Network research to evaluate the process of these interventions is less well developed. Using data from the “STis And Sexual Health” (STASH) feasibility trial of a school-based, peer-led...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Broccatelli, Chiara, Wang, Peng, McDaid, Lisa, McCann, Mark, Simpson, Sharon Anne, Elliott, Lawrie, Moore, Laurence, Mitchell, Kirstin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8192897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34112848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90852-w
_version_ 1783706135043244032
author Broccatelli, Chiara
Wang, Peng
McDaid, Lisa
McCann, Mark
Simpson, Sharon Anne
Elliott, Lawrie
Moore, Laurence
Mitchell, Kirstin
author_facet Broccatelli, Chiara
Wang, Peng
McDaid, Lisa
McCann, Mark
Simpson, Sharon Anne
Elliott, Lawrie
Moore, Laurence
Mitchell, Kirstin
author_sort Broccatelli, Chiara
collection PubMed
description There is growing interest in social network-based programmes to improve health, but rigorous methods using Social Network research to evaluate the process of these interventions is less well developed. Using data from the “STis And Sexual Health” (STASH) feasibility trial of a school-based, peer-led intervention on sexual health prevention, we illustrate how network data analysis results can address key components of process evaluations for complex interventions—implementation, mechanisms of impacts, and context. STASH trained students as Peer Supporters (PS) to diffuse sexual health messages though face-to-face interactions and online Facebook (FB) groups. We applied a Multilevel Exponential Random Graph modelling approach to analyse the interdependence between offline friendship relationships and online FB ties and how these different relationships align. Our results suggest that the creation of online FB communities mirrored offline adolescent groups, demonstrating fidelity of intervention delivery. Data on informal friendship networks related to student’s individual characteristics (i.e., demographics, sexual health knowledge and adherence to norms, which were included for STASH), contributed to an understanding of the social relational ‘building’ mechanisms that sustain tie-formation. This knowledge could assist the selection of opinion leaders, improving identification of influential peers situated in optimal network positions. This work provides a novel contribution to understanding how to integrate network research with the process evaluation of a network intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8192897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81928972021-06-14 Social Network Research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention Broccatelli, Chiara Wang, Peng McDaid, Lisa McCann, Mark Simpson, Sharon Anne Elliott, Lawrie Moore, Laurence Mitchell, Kirstin Sci Rep Article There is growing interest in social network-based programmes to improve health, but rigorous methods using Social Network research to evaluate the process of these interventions is less well developed. Using data from the “STis And Sexual Health” (STASH) feasibility trial of a school-based, peer-led intervention on sexual health prevention, we illustrate how network data analysis results can address key components of process evaluations for complex interventions—implementation, mechanisms of impacts, and context. STASH trained students as Peer Supporters (PS) to diffuse sexual health messages though face-to-face interactions and online Facebook (FB) groups. We applied a Multilevel Exponential Random Graph modelling approach to analyse the interdependence between offline friendship relationships and online FB ties and how these different relationships align. Our results suggest that the creation of online FB communities mirrored offline adolescent groups, demonstrating fidelity of intervention delivery. Data on informal friendship networks related to student’s individual characteristics (i.e., demographics, sexual health knowledge and adherence to norms, which were included for STASH), contributed to an understanding of the social relational ‘building’ mechanisms that sustain tie-formation. This knowledge could assist the selection of opinion leaders, improving identification of influential peers situated in optimal network positions. This work provides a novel contribution to understanding how to integrate network research with the process evaluation of a network intervention. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8192897/ /pubmed/34112848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90852-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Broccatelli, Chiara
Wang, Peng
McDaid, Lisa
McCann, Mark
Simpson, Sharon Anne
Elliott, Lawrie
Moore, Laurence
Mitchell, Kirstin
Social Network Research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention
title Social Network Research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention
title_full Social Network Research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention
title_fullStr Social Network Research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention
title_full_unstemmed Social Network Research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention
title_short Social Network Research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention
title_sort social network research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8192897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34112848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90852-w
work_keys_str_mv AT broccatellichiara socialnetworkresearchcontributiontoevaluatingprocessinafeasibilitystudyofapeerledandschoolbasedsexualhealthintervention
AT wangpeng socialnetworkresearchcontributiontoevaluatingprocessinafeasibilitystudyofapeerledandschoolbasedsexualhealthintervention
AT mcdaidlisa socialnetworkresearchcontributiontoevaluatingprocessinafeasibilitystudyofapeerledandschoolbasedsexualhealthintervention
AT mccannmark socialnetworkresearchcontributiontoevaluatingprocessinafeasibilitystudyofapeerledandschoolbasedsexualhealthintervention
AT simpsonsharonanne socialnetworkresearchcontributiontoevaluatingprocessinafeasibilitystudyofapeerledandschoolbasedsexualhealthintervention
AT elliottlawrie socialnetworkresearchcontributiontoevaluatingprocessinafeasibilitystudyofapeerledandschoolbasedsexualhealthintervention
AT moorelaurence socialnetworkresearchcontributiontoevaluatingprocessinafeasibilitystudyofapeerledandschoolbasedsexualhealthintervention
AT mitchellkirstin socialnetworkresearchcontributiontoevaluatingprocessinafeasibilitystudyofapeerledandschoolbasedsexualhealthintervention