Cargando…

Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes

Cancer is driven by distinctive sorts of changes and basic variations in genes. Recognizing cancer driver genes is basic for accurate oncological analysis. Numerous methodologies to distinguish and identify drivers presently exist, but efficient tools to combine and optimize them on huge datasets ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malebary, Sharaf J., Khan, Yaser Daanial
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8192921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34112883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91656-8
_version_ 1783706140737011712
author Malebary, Sharaf J.
Khan, Yaser Daanial
author_facet Malebary, Sharaf J.
Khan, Yaser Daanial
author_sort Malebary, Sharaf J.
collection PubMed
description Cancer is driven by distinctive sorts of changes and basic variations in genes. Recognizing cancer driver genes is basic for accurate oncological analysis. Numerous methodologies to distinguish and identify drivers presently exist, but efficient tools to combine and optimize them on huge datasets are few. Most strategies for prioritizing transformations depend basically on frequency-based criteria. Strategies are required to dependably prioritize organically dynamic driver changes over inert passengers in high-throughput sequencing cancer information sets. This study proposes a model namely PCDG-Pred which works as a utility capable of distinguishing cancer driver and passenger attributes of genes based on sequencing data. Keeping in view the significance of the cancer driver genes an efficient method is proposed to identify the cancer driver genes. Further, various validation techniques are applied at different levels to establish the effectiveness of the model and to obtain metrics like accuracy, Mathew’s correlation coefficient, sensitivity, and specificity. The results of the study strongly indicate that the proposed strategy provides a fundamental functional advantage over other existing strategies for cancer driver genes identification. Subsequently, careful experiments exhibit that the accuracy metrics obtained for self-consistency, independent set, and cross-validation tests are 91.08%., 87.26%, and 92.48% respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8192921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81929212021-06-14 Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes Malebary, Sharaf J. Khan, Yaser Daanial Sci Rep Article Cancer is driven by distinctive sorts of changes and basic variations in genes. Recognizing cancer driver genes is basic for accurate oncological analysis. Numerous methodologies to distinguish and identify drivers presently exist, but efficient tools to combine and optimize them on huge datasets are few. Most strategies for prioritizing transformations depend basically on frequency-based criteria. Strategies are required to dependably prioritize organically dynamic driver changes over inert passengers in high-throughput sequencing cancer information sets. This study proposes a model namely PCDG-Pred which works as a utility capable of distinguishing cancer driver and passenger attributes of genes based on sequencing data. Keeping in view the significance of the cancer driver genes an efficient method is proposed to identify the cancer driver genes. Further, various validation techniques are applied at different levels to establish the effectiveness of the model and to obtain metrics like accuracy, Mathew’s correlation coefficient, sensitivity, and specificity. The results of the study strongly indicate that the proposed strategy provides a fundamental functional advantage over other existing strategies for cancer driver genes identification. Subsequently, careful experiments exhibit that the accuracy metrics obtained for self-consistency, independent set, and cross-validation tests are 91.08%., 87.26%, and 92.48% respectively. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8192921/ /pubmed/34112883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91656-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Malebary, Sharaf J.
Khan, Yaser Daanial
Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes
title Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes
title_full Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes
title_fullStr Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes
title_short Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes
title_sort evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8192921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34112883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91656-8
work_keys_str_mv AT malebarysharafj evaluatingmachinelearningmethodologiesforidentificationofcancerdrivergenes
AT khanyaserdaanial evaluatingmachinelearningmethodologiesforidentificationofcancerdrivergenes