Cargando…
Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes
Cancer is driven by distinctive sorts of changes and basic variations in genes. Recognizing cancer driver genes is basic for accurate oncological analysis. Numerous methodologies to distinguish and identify drivers presently exist, but efficient tools to combine and optimize them on huge datasets ar...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8192921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34112883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91656-8 |
_version_ | 1783706140737011712 |
---|---|
author | Malebary, Sharaf J. Khan, Yaser Daanial |
author_facet | Malebary, Sharaf J. Khan, Yaser Daanial |
author_sort | Malebary, Sharaf J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cancer is driven by distinctive sorts of changes and basic variations in genes. Recognizing cancer driver genes is basic for accurate oncological analysis. Numerous methodologies to distinguish and identify drivers presently exist, but efficient tools to combine and optimize them on huge datasets are few. Most strategies for prioritizing transformations depend basically on frequency-based criteria. Strategies are required to dependably prioritize organically dynamic driver changes over inert passengers in high-throughput sequencing cancer information sets. This study proposes a model namely PCDG-Pred which works as a utility capable of distinguishing cancer driver and passenger attributes of genes based on sequencing data. Keeping in view the significance of the cancer driver genes an efficient method is proposed to identify the cancer driver genes. Further, various validation techniques are applied at different levels to establish the effectiveness of the model and to obtain metrics like accuracy, Mathew’s correlation coefficient, sensitivity, and specificity. The results of the study strongly indicate that the proposed strategy provides a fundamental functional advantage over other existing strategies for cancer driver genes identification. Subsequently, careful experiments exhibit that the accuracy metrics obtained for self-consistency, independent set, and cross-validation tests are 91.08%., 87.26%, and 92.48% respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8192921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81929212021-06-14 Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes Malebary, Sharaf J. Khan, Yaser Daanial Sci Rep Article Cancer is driven by distinctive sorts of changes and basic variations in genes. Recognizing cancer driver genes is basic for accurate oncological analysis. Numerous methodologies to distinguish and identify drivers presently exist, but efficient tools to combine and optimize them on huge datasets are few. Most strategies for prioritizing transformations depend basically on frequency-based criteria. Strategies are required to dependably prioritize organically dynamic driver changes over inert passengers in high-throughput sequencing cancer information sets. This study proposes a model namely PCDG-Pred which works as a utility capable of distinguishing cancer driver and passenger attributes of genes based on sequencing data. Keeping in view the significance of the cancer driver genes an efficient method is proposed to identify the cancer driver genes. Further, various validation techniques are applied at different levels to establish the effectiveness of the model and to obtain metrics like accuracy, Mathew’s correlation coefficient, sensitivity, and specificity. The results of the study strongly indicate that the proposed strategy provides a fundamental functional advantage over other existing strategies for cancer driver genes identification. Subsequently, careful experiments exhibit that the accuracy metrics obtained for self-consistency, independent set, and cross-validation tests are 91.08%., 87.26%, and 92.48% respectively. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8192921/ /pubmed/34112883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91656-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Malebary, Sharaf J. Khan, Yaser Daanial Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes |
title | Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes |
title_full | Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes |
title_fullStr | Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes |
title_short | Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes |
title_sort | evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8192921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34112883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91656-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malebarysharafj evaluatingmachinelearningmethodologiesforidentificationofcancerdrivergenes AT khanyaserdaanial evaluatingmachinelearningmethodologiesforidentificationofcancerdrivergenes |