Cargando…

The EU endocrine disruptors’ regulation and the glyphosate controversy

Endocrine disruptors are compounds that alter the functioning of the endocrine system of humans and wildlife. A large number of chemicals have been identified as EDs and humans can be exposed to them through dietary and/or environmental exposure (air, water, soil). At international level, scientific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalofiri, Paraskevi, Balias, Giorgos, Tekos, Fotios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8193069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34150528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.05.013
_version_ 1783706176401178624
author Kalofiri, Paraskevi
Balias, Giorgos
Tekos, Fotios
author_facet Kalofiri, Paraskevi
Balias, Giorgos
Tekos, Fotios
author_sort Kalofiri, Paraskevi
collection PubMed
description Endocrine disruptors are compounds that alter the functioning of the endocrine system of humans and wildlife. A large number of chemicals have been identified as EDs and humans can be exposed to them through dietary and/or environmental exposure (air, water, soil). At international level, scientific discussion on the topic of EDs focuses on the issue of setting out the scientific criteria according to which the key properties of these substances that render them EDs are determined. Regulatory action in EU has been impacted by the aforementioned discussion and, in particular, Regulation 2017/2100 and Regulation 2018/605 have been issued. However, these scientific criteria do not constitute a complete framework for the detection of EDs and, therefore, their adoption does not entail a fully effective human health protection. Moreover, glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH), are the most widely used pesticides worldwide. The glyphosate controversy turned the spotlight on pesticide regulation in the EU. The disagreement between IARC and regulatory evaluations of EFSA/ECHA has received great attention of citizens, organizations and stakeholders, as a result of methodological differences in the evaluation of the available evidence have been identified. This paper outlines the glyphosate controversy, following an overview of the EU EDs Regulation and pesticide legislation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8193069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81930692021-06-17 The EU endocrine disruptors’ regulation and the glyphosate controversy Kalofiri, Paraskevi Balias, Giorgos Tekos, Fotios Toxicol Rep Regular Article Endocrine disruptors are compounds that alter the functioning of the endocrine system of humans and wildlife. A large number of chemicals have been identified as EDs and humans can be exposed to them through dietary and/or environmental exposure (air, water, soil). At international level, scientific discussion on the topic of EDs focuses on the issue of setting out the scientific criteria according to which the key properties of these substances that render them EDs are determined. Regulatory action in EU has been impacted by the aforementioned discussion and, in particular, Regulation 2017/2100 and Regulation 2018/605 have been issued. However, these scientific criteria do not constitute a complete framework for the detection of EDs and, therefore, their adoption does not entail a fully effective human health protection. Moreover, glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH), are the most widely used pesticides worldwide. The glyphosate controversy turned the spotlight on pesticide regulation in the EU. The disagreement between IARC and regulatory evaluations of EFSA/ECHA has received great attention of citizens, organizations and stakeholders, as a result of methodological differences in the evaluation of the available evidence have been identified. This paper outlines the glyphosate controversy, following an overview of the EU EDs Regulation and pesticide legislation. Elsevier 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8193069/ /pubmed/34150528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.05.013 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Kalofiri, Paraskevi
Balias, Giorgos
Tekos, Fotios
The EU endocrine disruptors’ regulation and the glyphosate controversy
title The EU endocrine disruptors’ regulation and the glyphosate controversy
title_full The EU endocrine disruptors’ regulation and the glyphosate controversy
title_fullStr The EU endocrine disruptors’ regulation and the glyphosate controversy
title_full_unstemmed The EU endocrine disruptors’ regulation and the glyphosate controversy
title_short The EU endocrine disruptors’ regulation and the glyphosate controversy
title_sort eu endocrine disruptors’ regulation and the glyphosate controversy
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8193069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34150528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.05.013
work_keys_str_mv AT kalofiriparaskevi theeuendocrinedisruptorsregulationandtheglyphosatecontroversy
AT baliasgiorgos theeuendocrinedisruptorsregulationandtheglyphosatecontroversy
AT tekosfotios theeuendocrinedisruptorsregulationandtheglyphosatecontroversy
AT kalofiriparaskevi euendocrinedisruptorsregulationandtheglyphosatecontroversy
AT baliasgiorgos euendocrinedisruptorsregulationandtheglyphosatecontroversy
AT tekosfotios euendocrinedisruptorsregulationandtheglyphosatecontroversy