Cargando…
Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task
Positive social connections are crucial for recovery from Substance Use Disorder (SUD). Of interest is understanding potential social information processing (SIP) mediators of this effect. To explore whether persons with different SUD show idiosyncratic biases toward social signals, we administered...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8193089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122188 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.672488 |
_version_ | 1783706181253988352 |
---|---|
author | Bjork, James M. Keyser-Marcus, Lori Vassileva, Jasmin Ramey, Tatiana Houghton, David C. Moeller, F. Gerard |
author_facet | Bjork, James M. Keyser-Marcus, Lori Vassileva, Jasmin Ramey, Tatiana Houghton, David C. Moeller, F. Gerard |
author_sort | Bjork, James M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Positive social connections are crucial for recovery from Substance Use Disorder (SUD). Of interest is understanding potential social information processing (SIP) mediators of this effect. To explore whether persons with different SUD show idiosyncratic biases toward social signals, we administered an emotional go-nogo task (EGNG) to 31 individuals with Cocaine Use Disorder (CoUD), 31 with Cannabis Use Disorder (CaUD), 79 with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD), and 58 controls. Participants were instructed to respond to emotional faces (Fear/Happy) but withhold responses to expressionless faces in two task blocks, with the reverse instruction in the other two blocks. Emotional faces as non-targets elicited more “false alarm” (FA) commission errors as a main effect. Groups did not differ in overall rates of hits (correct responses to target faces), but participants with CaUD and CoUD showed reduced rates of hits (relative to controls) when expressionless faces were targets. OUD participants had worse hit rates [and slower reaction times (RT)] when fearful faces (but not happy faces) were targets. CaUD participants were most affected by instruction effects (respond/“go” vs withhold response/“no-go” to emotional face) on discriminability statistic A. Participants were faster to respond to happy face targets than to expressionless faces. However, this pattern was reversed in fearful face blocks in OUD and CoUD participants. This experiment replicated previous findings of the greater salience of expressive face images, and extends this finding to SUD, where persons with CaUD may show even greater bias toward emotional faces. Conversely, OUD participants showed idiosyncratic behavior in response to fearful faces suggestive of increased attentional disruption by fear. These data suggest a mechanism by which positive social signals may contribute to recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8193089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81930892021-06-12 Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task Bjork, James M. Keyser-Marcus, Lori Vassileva, Jasmin Ramey, Tatiana Houghton, David C. Moeller, F. Gerard Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Positive social connections are crucial for recovery from Substance Use Disorder (SUD). Of interest is understanding potential social information processing (SIP) mediators of this effect. To explore whether persons with different SUD show idiosyncratic biases toward social signals, we administered an emotional go-nogo task (EGNG) to 31 individuals with Cocaine Use Disorder (CoUD), 31 with Cannabis Use Disorder (CaUD), 79 with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD), and 58 controls. Participants were instructed to respond to emotional faces (Fear/Happy) but withhold responses to expressionless faces in two task blocks, with the reverse instruction in the other two blocks. Emotional faces as non-targets elicited more “false alarm” (FA) commission errors as a main effect. Groups did not differ in overall rates of hits (correct responses to target faces), but participants with CaUD and CoUD showed reduced rates of hits (relative to controls) when expressionless faces were targets. OUD participants had worse hit rates [and slower reaction times (RT)] when fearful faces (but not happy faces) were targets. CaUD participants were most affected by instruction effects (respond/“go” vs withhold response/“no-go” to emotional face) on discriminability statistic A. Participants were faster to respond to happy face targets than to expressionless faces. However, this pattern was reversed in fearful face blocks in OUD and CoUD participants. This experiment replicated previous findings of the greater salience of expressive face images, and extends this finding to SUD, where persons with CaUD may show even greater bias toward emotional faces. Conversely, OUD participants showed idiosyncratic behavior in response to fearful faces suggestive of increased attentional disruption by fear. These data suggest a mechanism by which positive social signals may contribute to recovery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8193089/ /pubmed/34122188 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.672488 Text en Copyright © 2021 Bjork, Keyser-Marcus, Vassileva, Ramey, Houghton and Moeller. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Bjork, James M. Keyser-Marcus, Lori Vassileva, Jasmin Ramey, Tatiana Houghton, David C. Moeller, F. Gerard Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task |
title | Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task |
title_full | Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task |
title_fullStr | Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task |
title_full_unstemmed | Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task |
title_short | Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task |
title_sort | social information processing in substance use disorders: insights from an emotional go-nogo task |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8193089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122188 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.672488 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bjorkjamesm socialinformationprocessinginsubstanceusedisordersinsightsfromanemotionalgonogotask AT keysermarcuslori socialinformationprocessinginsubstanceusedisordersinsightsfromanemotionalgonogotask AT vassilevajasmin socialinformationprocessinginsubstanceusedisordersinsightsfromanemotionalgonogotask AT rameytatiana socialinformationprocessinginsubstanceusedisordersinsightsfromanemotionalgonogotask AT houghtondavidc socialinformationprocessinginsubstanceusedisordersinsightsfromanemotionalgonogotask AT moellerfgerard socialinformationprocessinginsubstanceusedisordersinsightsfromanemotionalgonogotask |