Cargando…

Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task

Positive social connections are crucial for recovery from Substance Use Disorder (SUD). Of interest is understanding potential social information processing (SIP) mediators of this effect. To explore whether persons with different SUD show idiosyncratic biases toward social signals, we administered...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bjork, James M., Keyser-Marcus, Lori, Vassileva, Jasmin, Ramey, Tatiana, Houghton, David C., Moeller, F. Gerard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8193089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122188
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.672488
_version_ 1783706181253988352
author Bjork, James M.
Keyser-Marcus, Lori
Vassileva, Jasmin
Ramey, Tatiana
Houghton, David C.
Moeller, F. Gerard
author_facet Bjork, James M.
Keyser-Marcus, Lori
Vassileva, Jasmin
Ramey, Tatiana
Houghton, David C.
Moeller, F. Gerard
author_sort Bjork, James M.
collection PubMed
description Positive social connections are crucial for recovery from Substance Use Disorder (SUD). Of interest is understanding potential social information processing (SIP) mediators of this effect. To explore whether persons with different SUD show idiosyncratic biases toward social signals, we administered an emotional go-nogo task (EGNG) to 31 individuals with Cocaine Use Disorder (CoUD), 31 with Cannabis Use Disorder (CaUD), 79 with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD), and 58 controls. Participants were instructed to respond to emotional faces (Fear/Happy) but withhold responses to expressionless faces in two task blocks, with the reverse instruction in the other two blocks. Emotional faces as non-targets elicited more “false alarm” (FA) commission errors as a main effect. Groups did not differ in overall rates of hits (correct responses to target faces), but participants with CaUD and CoUD showed reduced rates of hits (relative to controls) when expressionless faces were targets. OUD participants had worse hit rates [and slower reaction times (RT)] when fearful faces (but not happy faces) were targets. CaUD participants were most affected by instruction effects (respond/“go” vs withhold response/“no-go” to emotional face) on discriminability statistic A. Participants were faster to respond to happy face targets than to expressionless faces. However, this pattern was reversed in fearful face blocks in OUD and CoUD participants. This experiment replicated previous findings of the greater salience of expressive face images, and extends this finding to SUD, where persons with CaUD may show even greater bias toward emotional faces. Conversely, OUD participants showed idiosyncratic behavior in response to fearful faces suggestive of increased attentional disruption by fear. These data suggest a mechanism by which positive social signals may contribute to recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8193089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81930892021-06-12 Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task Bjork, James M. Keyser-Marcus, Lori Vassileva, Jasmin Ramey, Tatiana Houghton, David C. Moeller, F. Gerard Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Positive social connections are crucial for recovery from Substance Use Disorder (SUD). Of interest is understanding potential social information processing (SIP) mediators of this effect. To explore whether persons with different SUD show idiosyncratic biases toward social signals, we administered an emotional go-nogo task (EGNG) to 31 individuals with Cocaine Use Disorder (CoUD), 31 with Cannabis Use Disorder (CaUD), 79 with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD), and 58 controls. Participants were instructed to respond to emotional faces (Fear/Happy) but withhold responses to expressionless faces in two task blocks, with the reverse instruction in the other two blocks. Emotional faces as non-targets elicited more “false alarm” (FA) commission errors as a main effect. Groups did not differ in overall rates of hits (correct responses to target faces), but participants with CaUD and CoUD showed reduced rates of hits (relative to controls) when expressionless faces were targets. OUD participants had worse hit rates [and slower reaction times (RT)] when fearful faces (but not happy faces) were targets. CaUD participants were most affected by instruction effects (respond/“go” vs withhold response/“no-go” to emotional face) on discriminability statistic A. Participants were faster to respond to happy face targets than to expressionless faces. However, this pattern was reversed in fearful face blocks in OUD and CoUD participants. This experiment replicated previous findings of the greater salience of expressive face images, and extends this finding to SUD, where persons with CaUD may show even greater bias toward emotional faces. Conversely, OUD participants showed idiosyncratic behavior in response to fearful faces suggestive of increased attentional disruption by fear. These data suggest a mechanism by which positive social signals may contribute to recovery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8193089/ /pubmed/34122188 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.672488 Text en Copyright © 2021 Bjork, Keyser-Marcus, Vassileva, Ramey, Houghton and Moeller. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Bjork, James M.
Keyser-Marcus, Lori
Vassileva, Jasmin
Ramey, Tatiana
Houghton, David C.
Moeller, F. Gerard
Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task
title Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task
title_full Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task
title_fullStr Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task
title_full_unstemmed Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task
title_short Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task
title_sort social information processing in substance use disorders: insights from an emotional go-nogo task
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8193089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122188
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.672488
work_keys_str_mv AT bjorkjamesm socialinformationprocessinginsubstanceusedisordersinsightsfromanemotionalgonogotask
AT keysermarcuslori socialinformationprocessinginsubstanceusedisordersinsightsfromanemotionalgonogotask
AT vassilevajasmin socialinformationprocessinginsubstanceusedisordersinsightsfromanemotionalgonogotask
AT rameytatiana socialinformationprocessinginsubstanceusedisordersinsightsfromanemotionalgonogotask
AT houghtondavidc socialinformationprocessinginsubstanceusedisordersinsightsfromanemotionalgonogotask
AT moellerfgerard socialinformationprocessinginsubstanceusedisordersinsightsfromanemotionalgonogotask